NASA Executives Condem NASA’s global warming endorsement

Do these people need to be "Treated"?

Astronauts condemn NASA’s global warming endorsement

In an unprecedented slap at NASA’s endorsement of global warming science, nearly 50 former astronauts and scientists--including the ex-boss of the Johnson Space Center--claim the agency is on the wrong side of science and must change course or ruin the reputation of the world’s top space agency.

Challenging statements from NASA that man is causing climate change, the former NASA executives demanded in a letter to Administrator Charles Bolden that he and the agency “refrain from including unproven remarks” supporting global warming in the media.

“We feel that NASA’s advocacy of an extreme position, prior to a thorough study of the possible overwhelming impact of natural climate drivers is inappropriate,” they wrote. “At risk is damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA, NASA’s current or former scientists and employees, and even the reputation of science itself.”

Wash Exam

Three cheers for them.

If you want a conspiracy its man made GLOBAL WARMING!!!

Its a lie for the purpose of money and global power.

reply to post by TheMindWar


Your opening question is unwarranted..obviously the science is NOT settled.

reply to post by type0civ


My question refers to the scientist whom recently said those who are skeptical of global warming being man made need to be "treated".

So my question is quite valid I believe

Originally posted by defcon5

The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.

My first question here would be that since these are “ex” NASA employees, how many are getting endorsements, or working as contractors, from industries that are accused of driving pollution and possible climate change, such as the automotive and oil industry?

As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.

I was trying to think of a good way to say what you did there

cheers

AGENDA motivated? The underlying reason may be they would rather see budget strapped NASA spend it's money on space programs.

"NASA Executives"??

I see 1 ex-executive named.

Who are the current ones (plural)??