Plane wreckage left over after F-18 crashes into building. (compare to 9/11)

Originally posted by psikeyhackr

Originally posted by Human_Alien

But yeah, amazing ain't it?
The laws of physics seem to vary depending on the event.

Yeah, physicists have to get special degrees for 9/11.

psik

Yes, it's called a masters in political science

Originally posted by Six Sigma
Why not rename this thread to:

Woman Bakes Delicious Apple Pie. (compare to Orange Juice)

Because it wouldn't makes sense!

Click here to learn more about this warning.

Originally posted by GenRadek
ok for starters:

The F-18 Super Hornet crashed with a minimal fuel load.
The F-18 crashed after flying very low and slow.
The F-18 impacted an apartment building, which is mostly wood and light brickwork.

The plane did not impact at 400+mph.
The plane did not impact a massive limestone wall.

Also, to whomever said that on 9/11 a 747 crashed, please, go back and do some actual research so you do not look ignorant and foolish as most Truthers do.

All of your points are accurate; consequently, the effect of the impact of the Boeing 757-223 unto the pentagon should have been drastically more significant that the impact as presented by the MSM. conclusion: not a plane that hit the building.

Click here to learn more about this warning.

Click here to learn more about this warning.

Originally posted by CynicalWabbit
There's a big difference between a fighter hitting a wood frame building and a commercial airliner hitting a structural steel building the size of the pentagon.

Indeed there is; however, if you use the fighter jet crash as a baseline, you can establish a relative scene relevant to the crash of the Boeing 757-223 into the pentagon.

It was a very poorly staged false flag.

*** ATTENTION ***

KNOCK IT OFF--- EVERYONE !!!!

Discuss the topic, stay on topic, stop with the name calling and be civil.

You will be post banned.

Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
I'm lost - what relevance has this to 9/11 aside from the fact a plane crashed?

the relevance is with the wreckage and damage.

small plane = large wreckage + large damage

Boeing 757-223 = a wheel + a hole and fire damage

So you are trying to compare a small fighter jet crash into a wooden house, with a massive airliner into a reinforced building?

ok..

Originally posted by Theprimevoyager
Goose....is dead...

Wow. Had to have seriously lost control to crash like that.

You gotta let him go, sir! You gotta let him go!



If that plane crashed into a few wood framed apartment building with a brick foundation it would look exactly like what it looks like in VA. If that plane crashed head on into a skyscraper full of fuel I bet there would be absolutely nothing left.

Lets not compare every single jet crash we see with what happened on 9/11. This was a completely different circumstance.

Wut is dis abut a plain crush at da pentagram n Shucksville?

It is apples and oranges (or watermelons or prunes) OP.
A plane crashed here, whereas no (passanger) plane crashed on 9/11/2001.

reply to post by porschedrifter


Best avatar ever lol

reply to post by freakyclown

there is a reason why they call t.v. "programming." if people would simply turn off their t.v.'s they would enter a world of rational thought, but since they do not, we really can't expect elites/leaders to not be corrupted by absolute power. add "accredited" education into the mix of t.v. programming and mind control becomes all too easy. so endless droning on about 9/11 is futile. the event happened and nothing in the past 11 years has brought anyone to justice. be wary of every 11 years though making 2012 interesting because they always do something every 11 years...

reply to post by pshea38


No plane theory? Despite coverage by CNN, NBC, ABC, DEF, all live broadcasting in hi-def technicolor?

reply to post by hocuspocus


American justice = elect another

The fighter jet weighs around 30,000 lbs and barely got off the ground according to witnesses. The 757 weighs around 70,000lbs and had been at normal flight altitude and speed prior to the shift of target. There really aren't any comparisons between the 911 events and this event and no evidence is gained from the visibility of the fighter jet post crash. That's an enormous leap to even try to draw conclusions in that regard. Do you want me to attach a picture of a bird that ran into my window and died yet it's body and the window are still in tact and tell you that it's proof as well? "Flying object + structure impact != universal results...derrr many variables."

Originally posted by Demigodly
reply to post by pshea38

 

No plane theory? Despite coverage by CNN, NBC, ABC, DEF, all live broadcasting in hi-def technicolor?

I take it that you haven't seen this.


Further evidence:
www.septemberclues.info
www.cluesforum.info

Faked video is the name of the game.
Snap out of it people!