It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CoherentlyConfused
reply to post by Violater1
Why would there be a blood trail? From what?
Originally posted by CoherentlyConfused
Why, was the body moved somewhere? You're rolling your eyes at me but I must be missing something.
Originally posted by DrJay1975
reply to post by Violater1
What is the point of more video footage? There are numerous folks that actually saw his injuries. There are hospital records that the police have reviewed. Numerous police offers examined his injuries. All of which validate he was getting the snot beat out of him. The medical examiner, the police and Martin's parents saw Trayvon's injuries. As big of an uproar as there is the DA would love to charge Zimmerman and appease the ignorant masses. The only problem is that no matter how bad they want to charge him, they obviously can't because his injuries, the 911 call and the witness statements all show the same thing. Zim called 911 because a large man, hiding his face was skulking between houses in the rain. George called 911 and didnt mention race till dispatch asked. He followed him until he was satisfied he gave 911 his correct location and then tried to find his truck. While walking towards the truck. Before he could get in Martin attacked him, beating him to the ground. During the beating sweet little Trayvon tell George,"Your gonna die tonight". Little did George know his attacker was busted vandalizing public property, drugs, was suspected of larceny and has shown his violent tendencies in the past. Zimmerman struggled to draw his sidearm and drew down on trayvon and shot him fatally.
Who cares about video? The er docs and police examinec zim and verified the truth. The ME and cops examined martin. His hands showed that he repeatedly hit someone repeatedly with a great deal of force. It also showed that he was uninjured prior to the shot.
Get over it. All of the evidence tells the same story. You dont need video. Trayvons history and his behavior that night shows he was the attacker. Video isnt needed. And given all the info, if you still support him, odds are you area racist. Most folks dont care about the evidence that cleared zimmerman. They care about supporting a criminal just because hes black. Screw that. George saved himself and took a dangerous ciminal off the streets.
Originally posted by spinalremain
Yeah he definitely has injuries there. Initially I thought he had none. The grainy shots really weren't good at all. These new ones clearly show that something bashed him in the head. Im not doctor, but it looks pretty swollen.
I don't know what to believe anymore. I don;t think we will ever fully know what went down that night exactly. Bottom line is that the kid did not deserve to die.
If Woody would have listened to the police ......................this never would have happened.
Originally posted by Violater1
Also, was the Martin family visiting someone who lived in the gated community?
Has anyone heard how far away from Mr. Zimmermans truck, Mr Martin's body was found?
So, I’ve broken down the Trayvon Martin George Zimmerman crime scene based on as much public information that’s currently available. Here’s what’s currently known (assuming what’s known is accurate)
Originally posted by Classified Info
Originally posted by Violater1
No one has answered my question yet. How far away from the truck was Martin found?
I will see if I can find a link somewhere but that had a good graphic on one of the cable channels.
His body was found on a walkway behind (or in between) the homes. It was not close to the street.
Yes, please provide a source for where his body was found. I'm sure there would be a blood trail, and that will end up in court as well. Thank you.
Originally posted by OneisOne
Originally posted by Violater1
Also, was the Martin family visiting someone who lived in the gated community?
Has anyone heard how far away from Mr. Zimmermans truck, Mr Martin's body was found?
He was visiting his father who lives in the community.
As far as locations go, I don't think specific details have been release. I did some searching and someone has tried to figured everything out based on available information.
So, I’ve broken down the Trayvon Martin George Zimmerman crime scene based on as much public information that’s currently available. Here’s what’s currently known (assuming what’s known is accurate)
You can find the page at bcclist.com. I would post some of the pics from the page, but the person revised the map as more information was released (and consequently "moved" where they think the truck was parked). It's a long post but they explain why they speculate what happened where. And let me stress, it is all speculation. And I'm not posting the link as an endorsement, but rather because you have asked the question repeatedly and no one has responded. So I hope that helps!!!
Also at the link is a video interview done with Trayvon's dad walking through the community, watching that might help get a "mental picture" of the locations.
OiO
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by CoherentlyConfused
You'd still be arrested and charged, just a matter of if you can prove self defense...that's how it's supposed to go, anyway.
www.5dca.org
Rather, "once a defendant makes a prima facie showing of
self-defense, the State has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the
defendant did not act in self-defense." ("While the defendant may
have the burden of going forward with evidence of self-defense, the burden of proving
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt never shifts from the State, and this standard broadly
includes the requirement that the State prove that the defendant did not act in selfdefense beyond a reasonable doubt.").
Spicer's counsel was obviously unaware of the law on this point, and repeatedly explained to the jury in his closing argument that it was Spicer's burden to prove selfdefense. Compounding this mistake, Spicer's lawyer proposed an old standard jury instruction which also erroneously stated that self-defense had to be "proved beyond a reasonable doubt."