NBC Caught Selectively Editing Zimmerman 911 Tape

Great find, NBC throwing some BS around?
Not a surprise to me. Now why would they do this?
Because they have an agenda maybe, who's paying
these folks, the puppet masters are doing a play
RIGHT NOW....
Anyone and everyone on this site
I think has read the thread justice for zimmerman?
Click the sig, everything has been vetted,
all evidence that we know.
NO EVIDENCE NO CASE
You can not arrest someone and charge
them if there is no evidence despite
public opinion. Let them do there job
and quit listening to MSNBC who
employ good OL AL and is a lap dog
for the obama admin.
You kno why they did this.
Election time is coming and the base
had to be excited.

Originally posted by Shark_Feeder
Why do I not expect this thread to be buried under a deluge of replies, like the many other threads on this Zimmerman/Martin "situation"?

I hear ya'. Because this thread points out what people don't want to hear.
That they are basing their opinions on bunk that has been fed them via media spin and hype.
The fact is that no one knows what really happened.
Everyone is jumping to conclusions based upon BAD INFORMATION.

The question is .. WHY is all that bad information being pushed on the American public?
What is the agenda of MSNBC and the others who are doing it?

Originally posted by havok
reply to post by freedom12

 

Actually that recording is not very clear.
I hear "#ing punks" not "coons".
PUNKS.

When I first heard about the audio I went into expecting to hear the word "coons". But I didn't, I heard "punks".

I worked in radio for over 7 years and there is this expression called "popping p's". That's what I hear, the pop of a P. No doubt in my mind he said punks.

OiO

I hear "punks" too! There is quite a campaign going on here in the media.

reply to post by OneisOne


I'm glad to see a reply with some validity to my claim.
Thanks, because I definitely didn't hear "coons".
And I was trying to imagine it too...but kept hearing "punks" and the such.

It's a stretch to imagine he said "coons."
Sorry freedom12, I'm not picking on you.

Who uses the word "coon" these days anyways?
Wasn't it dropped from our language in the 1970's?

Originally posted by freedom12
reply to post by pierregustavetoutant

 

He clearly says, "#ing Coons" sir. There is no stretch to hear it.

If he isn't saying that, then what do you insist he is saying?

edit on 1-4-2012 by freedom12 because: (no reason given)

That is severe stretching of a suggestion vulnerable imagination.I do suggest you check out "Ghost Hunters" on SyFy, though. They also rely on random digitized sound data to get lots of "EVP proof" of things that don't exist in reality.

Here's a video piece on this:



Outrageous.

Originally posted by OneisOne

Originally posted by havok
reply to post by freedom12

 

Actually that recording is not very clear.
I hear "#ing punks" not "coons".
PUNKS.

When I first heard about the audio I went into expecting to hear the word "coons". But I didn't, I heard "punks".

I worked in radio for over 7 years and there is this expression called "popping p's". That's what I hear, the pop of a P. No doubt in my mind he said punks.

OiO

being in radio and recording now....i know all about the popping p's...i hear punk too....

i actually hear the 'UNKS' part very clear too.....with an emphasis on UN not ooon

reply to post by freedom12


from the various threads on this issue i think its been theorised that he might have said GOON not a slur but again thas a theory nbc is gonna get a lot of flack for this and they should as we all know to take every thing we read on the msm with a grain of salt but when they get caught outright lying and covering it up its just makes it look like they think we are frigging idiots and we wont catch on to this stuff

Originally posted by havok
reply to post by freedom12

 

Actually that recording is not very clear.
I hear " #ing punks" not "coons".
PUNKS.

But its okay because its clear to you.
With his hispanic background it could've been in spanish for all I know.


Believe the hype.

Definitely a "UH" sound, not an "OO" sound. Concentrate on the vowel sound and you'll hear it.

You will hear whatever you are told to hear, unless you stay objective.

reply to post by freedom12


Clearly punks.
No absolute doubt. Perhaps you need a hearing test, not being sarcastic, it's just that you may not be able to hear the p pop, because it is very clear.

reply to post by freedom12


I am calling BS on this audio. It is like ghost hunting for audio, and voice matrixing. I can easily hear cold vs "coon"-get over and next. And if he did say as you state, what, the Black Panthers will get him, more blood shed, no let me guess, we are going to riot over the words said or not said here? then what though, do we chase all races out of the US that don't belong??? Let me see, that would leave hispanics and Native Americans. I am just saying, really, what next? When is everything going to be assuaged for this ONE victim? Then where do we find another racism slur or murder to start again? When do we realize the actions of one should stay that way? And furthermore, let the courts take care of this! Damn! No one will be able to be on jury duty at this rate, everyone will have heard about this, and have some sort of an opinion.

I think NBC should be personally held responsible for any problems that come out of this situation. Most people will only hear their "rendition" and just to conclusions and no one will ever hear of the the real tape outside of a few forums such as this or a few blogs. So if any race riots start or someone gets killed i think the executives at NBC should be held criminally and civilly liable. This is not making a story this is plain bold face lying. If i was Zimmerman i would hire a good lawyer and nail them with a slander suit with a no chance for an out of court settlement and completely ruin NBC. This is worse than the phone hack scandal with Murdock and i hope it goes worse for them than it did for Murdock.

PS. I have blocked all NBC stations in my home now and i recommend everyone do the same let their ratings tank time to vote with your remote.

rhyme not intentional but man that's an awesome slogan wish i could put that on a sign and go picket

So I'm watching NBC Nightly news with Lester Holt and of course a Tayvon Martin piece is discussed and they have had experts use technology "similar to what the NSA and CIA use" to analyze the 9-11 call. The only part of the call they imply was analyzed was the word "help". And the expert interview snip they air says after that the voice heard is "100% not Zimmerman."

Ok, but they didn't say it was 100% Tayvon!

If it's so conclusive, why don't they say they are 100% sure it's Tayvon's voice??

Probably because in reality, they aren't 100% sure of much and they want more coverage of this divisive story on MSM, and to sway public opinion even more.

Why must this game be played with people's minds? Frustrating..

reply to post by freedom12


this is just like a freaking EVP you hear what you want to hear.

[color=F0FFEB]Does it really matter what he said? What is the point in debating it?

The end result is the same, regardless of whether or not he said coon, punk, dog, cat, chicken, monkey, elephant, tree, building, pterodactyl, or popcorn. He walked away, and will speak again another day. Trayvon was not given that chance.

The decisions he made, and the actions that those decisions led to, are important, not his words.

Originally posted by freedom12
And no mention of Zimmerman muttering "#ing coon" either?

Why isn't this headlines? It completely shows Zimmerman's racial bigotry.

Racist or not does not matter. He saw someone suspicious called the law and got attacked. In the law verbal taunts arent justification for putting your hands on someone. Someone beating the crap out of you and saying your gonna die is justification for shooting them. Racism doesnt change what took place. So its irrelevant. Hate crime legislation is ridiculous. One first degree murder isnt worse than another because john doe hates blacks.

Originally posted by BrokenCircles
[color=F0FFEB]Does it really matter what he said? What is the point in debating it?

The end result is the same, regardless of whether or not he said coon, punk, dog, cat, chicken, monkey, elephant, tree, building, pterodactyl, or popcorn. He walked away, and will speak again another day. Trayvon was not given that chance.

The decisions he made, and the actions that those decisions led to, are important, not his words.

I agree with you. He made a snap judgement because a guy is out "just walking around looking" that meant to him he is weird he is on drugs he is a thief.

No matter how i look at it, I see a citizen being followed, illegally harassed and by an armed civilian an ubnarmed 17 year old is dead.

if a cop had done this every single person would be up in arms. That's a fact. Where is all the stand up for our rights...to walk around at night as we please until CAUGHT doing something wrong!?

reply to post by freedom12



lol i'm mexican. there is no spanish. he is saying punks.

you ever hear a song lyric and what you think it is is the wrong lyric? then you look it up on google and find the right one and forever hear the correct lyric afterward? it's like that except backwards. every news story i saw on tv made sure everybody knew this guy made a racial slur or outright said he clearly says coons before playing this tape. it works the same way. media manipulation, you don't get to be on tv without knowing how to play the game.

Originally posted by freedom12
reply to post by pierregustavetoutant

 

He clearly says, "#ing Coons" sir. There is no stretch to hear it.

If he isn't saying that, then what do you insist he is saying?

edit on 1-4-2012 by freedom12 because: (no reason given)

i heard "what a tool". i also heard, "that's the moon", i also heard "#ing fool", etc.