Official Video of Non-Human Entity! Never Been Debunked!

turkeyufocase.blogspot.com...

Case Overview:
This case developed over the Sea of Marmara located near Istanbul between the years of 2007, 2008, and 2009 and is ongoing. The case made big news in Turkey and in other countries as well. It also started a great debate between the official members of the Turkish scientific community The footage was taken by a security guard at the "Yeni Kent Compound" which is on the coast of Turkey. One singularity of this case was that the images were made with a camera that had an adaptor for close ups of 200X optical, achieving a great amount of detail of the objects. During this period several minutes of close range video were taken of metallic ufos floating or changing while in flight over the sea coast of Marmara. They appeared as and outline of glowing orange ovals as well as the classic disc shape. Many special effects and imaging experts have tried to debunk the footage including: Prof. José Atenas, an expert in graphics and video, with more than 30 years of experience on television, Prof. phD. Zeki EKER Director National Council For The Study Of Science And Technology and National Observatory. Mario Valdes from Santiago Chile also spent a great amount of time studying each frame. Other analysis was done by video specialists, image edition and special effect companies from Japan, Russia and Turkey, all ending up with the same conclusions. They could not find evidence of a hoax and all of them determined that what is being filmed was not a product of a balloon, prop, model, or special effects.

Part 2 - Non-Human Entity Video


Part 1 - Case Overview

Sirius UFO Space Sciences Research Center:
At first, the videos were analyzed and made public by the SIRIUS UFO organization, directed by the researcher Haktan Akdogan. Sirius UFO Space Science Research Center firstly, spoke with all the witnesses separately then did the detailed analysis of the full footage of 2 hours 30 mn. long with the participation of the members of a science board. They enlarged the video images, did all the detailed analysis, checked their pixels, and went through the all footage frame by frame. After doing all the necessary analysis which went on for several weeks. SIRIUS released the following statement:


Haktan Akdagan, SIRIUS Space Research: "the objects sighted in the aforementioned footage that have a structure that is mad e of specific material are definitely not made up by any kind of computer animation nor are they any form of special effects used for simulation in a studio or for a video effect therefore in conclusion it was decided that the sightings were neither a mock up or hoax. And it is concluded that these objects in the sightings that have physical and material structures do not belong in any category such as; planes, helicopters, meteors, Venus, Mars, satellites, fire balls, Chinese lantern, fire balls, weather balloons, natural or atmospheric phenomenon. etc. and but rather fall into the category of UFO’s. The incident went on several times intermittently before the very eyes of the residents of "Yeni Kent Compound", filmed by a night guard named Yalcin Yalman. The detailed analysis of a certain portion of these extraordinary videos showed that three different objects were captured at the same time."

Mod note: Please use the proper [ex] tags when copying and pasting other people's work. Also, if you want to share something with the ATS community, remember to add your own thoughts on the matter as well.

(face palm with sigh) here we go again.

Mod Note: 1-line posts. Please review!

Official? What is official about it?
Non-human entity? Where?
"Haktan Akdagan, SIRIUS Space Research" is in the business of selling UFO stuff. What would you expect him to say?
www.bodrumbaskisi.com...

reply to post by amongus


I'm assuming that you are trying to imply that this has indeed been debunked. I have never seen this footage before. Could you please provide a link, even an ATS link, to some information about the debunking? Thanks.

I haven't watched all of the video yet but I must admit that it looks pretty fake. I'll give it a chance though.

Wow great copy and paste work .
You have no opinion on this yourself ?

See at 6.05 on the video


Its a ship , not a spaceship .... just a ship

This footage has not been debunked. The debunkers are frusterated over it.
Read this website to learn more turkeyufocase.blogspot.com...

Originally posted by ProjectBlue
reply to post by amongus

 

I'm assuming that you are trying to imply that this has indeed been debunked. I have never seen this footage before. Could you please provide a link, even an ATS link, to some information about the debunking? Thanks.

I haven't watched all of the video yet but I must admit that it looks pretty fake. I'll give it a chance though.

I have a better idea: type in Turkish UFO into the search function. Hit enter. Do the research yourself. Never said it had been debunked. I was implying that this did not deserve yet another thread.

reply to post by Phage


What about the National Observatory of Turkey and Science Technology Review Board (Offiicially Sanctioned byt the Turkish Government)

Mr.Tolga Özdeniz
ATV Channel - Programme Editor
On January 31, 2008, a MiniDV format video cassette holding 35 minutes of footage was brought over to “TUBITAK” The Science and Technology Research Board of Turkey’s (a Scientific Institution owned by the state that is highly reliable and influential) National Observatory (TUG) by Mr.Tolga Ozdeniz, the Editor of “Reporter” that has been aired on ATV Channel. The footage on the cassette was said to have been recorded by a Canon GL1 MiniDV digital camera on a beach of a holiday village in Kumburgaz/Istanbul by an amateur.
The images were examined by TUG- National Observatory Image Processing Unit. Because, it would take quite a long time to analyze all of the images, only randomly selected parts were pre-examined. During this process, emphasis was not placed on images produced by optical clarification effects which a number of point light sources generated.
The examination of these frames has yielded following results:
The images were recorded in digital NTSC format by above-mentioned camera.
The date on the video indicates that the recordings were made during 2007, 2008, and 2009.
The footage images of the object which visibly have a certain configuration are not computer animations, special video effects or studio re-created images or models. The footage is genuine…
The first observation made from the footage is that some of the images were recorded in nighttime sky at a certain altitude from the horizon. The footage also covers images of moon in some parts which proves that the video was shot in nighttime and open air. But, the fact that digital date display’s showing AM in certain frames and PM in others, raises suspicion about the validity of the time in which the recordings were made.
Since in some parts, there is no other object that can be featured as a reference in the close-up frames and no observable differences were found on background examination, the actual location, distance, dimensions and nature of the objects could not have been determined.
Through the examination of shootings of multiple dates, it’s a strong possibility that 2-3 different objects were captured. However, it’s difficult to determine whether the objects are moving or not. Their movement is slow even if they do so.
The reflections of light on the objects are sometimes caused by moon which was in a convenient location at that time, and sometimes produced by some other sources of light…
The light reflection from the left side of the object which is seen on August 10th shootings is not produced by the moon. At that time, the moon was in a phase that was pretty close to the “new moon” phase and located approximately at a 10 degrees proximity/angle to the horizon. Moreover, the image processing analysis conducted on some part of the footage revealed that the center of the object has the same density as its background, namely is of a transparent nature.
In conclusion, even though a detailed analysis of the footage is conducted, it might still remain unidentified. Hence, other reference objects need to be recorded in the same frame with the disputable object and further shootings need to be done by ourselves with special equipment in the same location and conditions.
Accordingly, the term “UFO” (Unidentified Flying Object) which has been used for these sort of dubious objects can also be used for these objects . But, this definition does not mean that these objects are from extraterrestrial (flying saucer etc.) origin.
Prof. phD. Zeki EKER
Director
National Observatory of TUBITAK

Source

Mod Note: Please quote properly by using [ex] tags and linking to the source.

reply to post by MrDetective

The TUBITAK "analysis"
Notice that the report says the tape was received on January 31, 2008.

Here is a scan of the report (in Turkish):
www.siriusufo.org...
Notice that the date of the report is January 31, 2008. TUBITAK received the tape and issued the report on the same day. They barely had a chance to look at it unless they had nothing else to do. If this is just a preliminary ("pre-evaluation") report, where is the final report? In any case I see only two thing of interest in the report. The truncated translation says that the tape is not CGI (I would agree with that). It also says the tape was not made in a studio (though I can't imagine how they would determine that). It says nothing else which bears on its authenticity.

Because, it would take quite a long time to analyze all of the images, only randomly selected parts were pre-examined.

The "analysis" is worthless.

reply to post by amongus


Hey, I just thought you had a certain thread or webpage in mind, and I wanted you to share. I will indeed do my own research, thanks. Pardon me for being interested in your opinion.

Concerning the video, I really don't see how you can get such detail at night time, it just doesn't seem right to me. The more I think about the more I'm sure that even with a bright moon it would be impossible to see an occupant in the "craft". I'm pretty sure that the more you zoom in the less light you have to work with, at least that is how it works with telescopes.

Good find, gortex, a brightly lit up ship out at sea makes sense. Much more plausible than a spacecraft with alien occupant lit by only moon light.

That was really creepy.

The face just pops out when they enhance the photo.

The slight arm movement made it look real.

reply to post by Phage


Let me quickly squash the point you are trying to make.

Here is what Haktan Akdagon's Press Release said:

Maybe you were not fully informed.

We, at Sirius UFO Space Science Research Center did the detailed analysis of the full footage with the participation of our members of science board. We have enlarged the video images of the footages, did all the detailed analysis and checked their pixels and went through the all footage frame by frame. After doing all the necessary analysis which went on for a week, we came to a definite conclusion with no doubts that these are "100% genuine footages"!

turkeyufocase.blogspot.com...



analysis of the full footage with the participation of our members of science board. We have enlarged the video images of the footages, did all the detailed analysis and checked their pixels and went through the all footage frame by frame.

So as you can see the analysis is not useless.

reply to post by Frankenchrist


It is real and don't be scared. They only abduct those individuals who have the family lines that contain the DNA they need.

They always bring people back. So don't be to creeped out!

reply to post by ProjectBlue


If you're looking for "more sense"...than a splashing dolphin is your best bet. I'm always amused when people seem to pick that which is "more likely", completely ignoring the fact that it doesn't look like that which is most likely.

Originally posted by gortex
Its a ship , not a spaceship .... just a ship

The author of the video said it looks like a ship, not that it is a ship.

Major difference.

reply to post by imherejusttoread


If that looks like any human sea ship, I'm a monkeys uncle. Is that with or without the 3-D glasses?

Originally posted by MarioOnTheFly
reply to post by imherejusttoread

 

If that looks like any human sea ship, I'm a monkeys uncle. Is that with or without the 3-D glasses?

Really ?


Given that the UFO is out at sea and has a habit of returning to the same place surely the most logical answer would be that its a ship .

Thread by Chadwickus
The infamous Turkey UFO a yacht?

I sincerely doubt a ship that size would be "lights out". You are saying it's in complete darkness except the control room or what? That's a big passenger ship...it would be lit up like christmas tree.


edit: Anyway...that thing shown at the beginning (around 0:40) of the first video in OP doesn't fit with what you've shown here