ObamaCare: Precedent to allow the Government to require one to take the rfid chip?

IF the Federal Government can require one to have health care for the greater good, then the precedent will be established to require citizens to take "the chip" to facilitate health care, national security and anything it deems for the "greater good"....could this be part of a hidden agenda to require citizen chipping after a national emergency?

now this is one of the truest posts in awhile.. one product is no different then another.
and why not make it easier to track what health services they provide?
all in all lets welcome our new overlords.... well that is unless the SCOTUS shoots down the bs...
But Gee I would LOVE a new Volt

I think the answer is yes. It would be just a matter of time, in my opinion.

Not until they can make the chip more secure... they are so easy to hack and all your personal information is right there....

The only way I see them actually making this real is by making all electronics illegal... so we can hack them... then all IT people will be illegal or work for the government..

reply to post by Doalrite

The only way I see them actually making this real is by making all electronics illegal... so we can hack them... then all IT people will be illegal or work for the government..

Huh??

reply to post by Doalrite

Not until they can make the chip more secure... they are so easy to hack and all your personal information is right there....

I have to agree with you there. Our government is so inefficient now, the thought that they could maintain a database on every citizen through microchips--and do so effectively--is laughable at best. Doesn't mean they wouldn't try it, though.....that's how arrogant they are.

The current administration's arguments for Obamacare follow this line of thinking....They will say it's all under the aegis of "personal responsibility".

That dog won't hunt, monsignor.....It's not even a dog, it is a Trojan Horse.

reply to post by CosmicCitizen

.could this be part of a hidden agenda to require citizen chipping after a national emergency?

The only chance in hell they would have of getting support from the population for this would be through a national emergency.....if they were lucky. There are still some legislators who haven't sold their souls ENTIRELY to the devil who have created legislation that forbids forced microchipping on the population by the government.

If that ever happens,look for my picture on the wanted poster. My name on here is my real name so you'll know its me.

reply to post by FissionSurplus


Cats creep me the f#*k out and that avatar doesnt help.....

I would have thought you could fight this on religious grounds. It should be winnable by by quoting the bible or most good books. The mark of the beast and all that.

It is all about control. Not actual control but perceived control. If you believe you are controlled then you are.

Just imagine the ability to present "evidence." Yes your honor, the accused was at the bank at the time of the robbery, we have the location chip data as evidence. The data cannot be compromised in any way. It is very secure! We never lie. No your honor I never eat donuts!

P

Originally posted by NightGypsy
reply to post by Doalrite

 

The only way I see them actually making this real is by making all electronics illegal... so we can hack them... then all IT people will be illegal or work for the government..

Huh??

Sorry mistype.. I meant... So we can't hack them... because the government sucks so bad in anything the only way to make them efficent and safe would to be to make all electronics illegal so normal citizens wouldn't have access to anything

Required daily calethenics under a watchfull drill sargents eye.
Broccoli every day.
No meat.

All because downstream, not doing these things affect the cost of healthcare which is what the arguement was in the Supreme Court.

Originally posted by FissionSurplus
The current administration's arguments for Obamacare follow this line of thinking....They will say it's all under the aegis of "personal responsibility".

That dog won't hunt, monsignor.....It's not even a dog, it is a Trojan Horse.

The healthcare bill has absolutely nothing to do with the medical field except for eventual total behavior control, second to second, every day. All because the cost of healthcare would otherwise be affected to the detriment of the country, you unpatriotic so and so!

reply to post by JayFlores


Sounds like a personal psychosis to me.

2nd line.

reply to post by tkwasny


Unpatriotic? Or not a sheep?

I assume you were just yankin' my chain.....Obamacare to me is nothing but a big boon for the health insurance companies. It does nothing to address the real flaws in the system, and why we as a nation are fixated on running to the doctor rather than taking care of ourselves. We nurture illness, not wellness.

The personal relationship between a doctor and patient will be taken away with Obama Care. If the Gov. has control of the doctors, the Gov. will also have control of the patients. Once Obama Care comes into play, chips will be put in people by Gov. controlled doctors. The only obstacle they have against it is not having a chip that won’t be detected by x-ray. Once they are able to do so, Gov. Doctors will inject undetectable chips into new born babies.

And of course, we all know where it goes from there...

Originally posted by JayFlores
reply to post by FissionSurplus

 

Cats creep me the f#*k out and that avatar doesnt help.....

True, but has creepy even been so scholarly?
Damn your post made me laugh.

March 23, 2013.