Could this be what hit the WTC?

Originally posted by DrEugeneFixer
Unless of course.... THEY'RE ALL IN ON IT.

Hi there doc,
Heal me
Obviously we know where your loyalities digress to.

The question here is who the flock is the they in THEY'RE.

AS in- what are you muttering about?

Are you muttering about some damn fools with a report??
The ones running all over the world, PLEADING
Please Beleive this Nonsense.
come on back ya hear ljb

reply to post by longjohnbritches


Looks like we're in the Hoax bin.

Come here often??

I'm out of here.

Originally posted by DrEugeneFixer
reply to post by longjohnbritches

 

Looks like we're in the Hoax bin.

Come here often??

I'm out of here.

Yes sir doc you are out there Way out.
Duh, where have you been whlie I have OWNED the MERRY BAND of BEND?
For some reason or other I haven't tucked you in YET.
Now back on task.
WHO is the they in They're
Or has the kitty clamped down on your tounge??
boring ljb

Originally posted by PageAlaCearl
reply to post by smyleegrl

 

There wasn't a shred of evidence that shows a plane hit the pentagon, no marks on the grass,

Why would there be, since the a/c didn't hit the grass??!! (Snopes notwithstanding)

no bodies,

Bzzttt.... and bzzztt....

no wings, too small of a hole in the pentagon, no damage from the wings

Bzztt....bzzzzt....bzzztt.....

reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul


WHAT GAUL
Did you say NOTHING hit the Pentagon on 911???
love you twits ljb

reply to post by longjohnbritches


No, I didn't say that.

Glad to have cleared that up for you

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by longjohnbritches

 

No, I didn't say that.

Glad to have cleared that up for you

Yes you did . Stop being a chicken!

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul

Why would there be, since the a/c didn't hit the grass??!!

Because if you actually paid attention to the details you would realise that for the plane to have hit where it did the engines would have hit the lawn.







And you use Popular Mechanics as a source?

reply to post by ANOK
Whats so funny about popular mechanics? its been a highly respected and very popular american magazine for well over a hundred years,since 1902...

Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by ANOK

 

Whats so funny about popular mechanics? its been a highly respected and very popular american magazine for well over a hundred years,since 1902...

Well first off it's owned by the Hearst corporation, and on the 911 debate it simply took the government line.

It didn't do an independent investigation. It focused on the most absurd 911 theories as if they were what we all believed. It was another whitewash. It's the MSM.

en.wikipedia.org...

Would you trust them?

reply to post by ANOK
I was just mentioning the history and the popularity of the popular mechanics magazine itself,not which way they were leaning about the 911 events...

Originally posted by blocula
reply to post by ANOK

 

I was just mentioning the history and the popularity of the popular mechanics magazine itself,not which way they were leaning about the 911 events...

But that is what I was referring to when I mentioned PM lol.

This IS the 911 forum, The Gaul was using their article on 911.

I thought it would have been pretty obvious that was what I was referring to, not the whole history of PM.

Originally posted by longjohnbritches

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by longjohnbritches

 

No, I didn't say that.

Glad to have cleared that up for you

Yes you did . Stop being a chicken!

Perhaps you would like to show me where I said it then?

Originally posted by ANOK

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul

Why would there be, since the a/c didn't hit the grass??!!

Because if you actually paid attention to the details you would realise that for the plane to have hit where it did the engines would have hit the lawn.

There is nothing there that shows the engines had to hit the lawn.

Flight 77 hit various structures and items outside the Pentagon with a couple of feet of clearance to the ground.

Eg see here, and detail photo here

reply to post by ANOK


Hi anok,
Thanks for the vids,
What I see just in the last one, without even watching the video is the image above (cover page of the vid)?
It actually looks like there was an explosion from inside, blowing the walls off thier super structure.
Much more so, than a plane or anything making a penetration hole.
the best ljb

Cantor Fitzgerald L.P., an investment bank on the 101st–105th floors of the North Tower, lost 658 employees, considerably more than any other employer.[45] Marsh Inc., located immediately below Cantor Fitzgerald on floors 93–100, lost 358 employees,[46][47] and 175 employees of Aon Corporation were also killed.

Who knows anyone who works for those companies? Who knows anyone who knows anyone who works for those companies? Do any of those employees even exist? Would it be hard to give each one a million bucks or some ludicrous amount of money to go along with the plan? Could all those floors have been empty? How many people really did die? Why were only 300 bodies recovered, yet passports and credit cards were found intact? Why cant we see a Boeing in the Pentagon footage? The media had 14 minutes to get in the air and catch the 2nd crash from all angles, yet our government didnt know a 2nd plane was even hi-jacked? And if they did, what were they doing in that 14 minutes? Did they even attempt to break up the flight path? Save all the innocent lives about to die in the South Tower?

No.

George Bush was in a classroom reading a book, so that the whole world would know his location at the time. If he was reading to children, he obviously had no idea a terrorist attack would occur.............right?

reply to post by holywar666
"we" know what "they" want us to know,because all we know is what they tell us through their puppets on a string media and tptb have a long running nasty habit of lying and deceiving the mainstream sheeple...

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul

Originally posted by PageAlaCearl
reply to post by smyleegrl

 

There wasn't a shred of evidence that shows a plane hit the pentagon, no marks on the grass,

To Aloy
I am not sure about all this.
So I will say sorry if I misunderstood the above.
cheers ljb

Originally posted by longjohnbritches

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul

Originally posted by PageAlaCearl
reply to post by smyleegrl

 

There wasn't a shred of evidence that shows a plane hit the pentagon, no marks on the grass,

To Aloy
I am not sure about all this.
So I will say sorry if I misunderstood the above.
cheers ljb

That was said by someone else - I said the plane didn't hit the grass, so why would there be marks - I think you got mixed up a bit.

Originally posted by holywar666

Cantor Fitzgerald L.P., an investment bank on the 101st–105th floors of the North Tower, lost 658 employees, considerably more than any other employer.[45] Marsh Inc., located immediately below Cantor Fitzgerald on floors 93–100, lost 358 employees,[46][47] and 175 employees of Aon Corporation were also killed.

Who knows anyone who works for those companies? Who knows anyone who knows anyone who works for those companies? Do any of those employees even exist?

I know someone who knew someone who worked for Cantor. He called him in his office after the plane hit. Somebody answered and my colleague was severely traumatised by what he heard, which amounted to someone in extraordinary circumstances screaming about how they were all dying.

Probably done with a computer or actors though, yeah?