It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Homedawg
It HAS been built...it's prefab and only has to be assembled in place..about 24hrs total
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by hab22
You still ignore the fact that the temple has yet to be rebuilt.
ETA: This is the wrong forum. Why post it here?
edit on 29-3-2012 by DarthMuerte because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CLPrime
reply to post by hab22
The NIV and the NKJV are wrong. The word translated as "wing" is kanaph. Metaphorically, it can refer to a wing, but it more typically refers to an extremity of something (that is, the extreme part of something, whether physical or not). In this verse, grammatically, we have to say that the word is applied to the "abomination," indicating that it is an extreme abomination - or, as I render it, the overspreading of abominations. This refers to abominations existing to such an extent that they leave the city desolate. Hence, the abomination that causes desolation. Once again, Luke applies this to the surrounding of Jerusalem by armies, which most certainly left the city desolate. [/quote
Well, time will soon tell if my theory is correct about the abomination being set up this spring. When I refer to the abomination being set up on a wing of the temple, I do not mean so in the metaphorical sense, but in the literal sense, that it will be set up "in the extreme part" (as you well described it) of the temple, which is where I believe the Dome of the Rock is located. Revelation speaks of the "Court of the Gentiles" being given over to the forces of antichrist for 42 months. II Thes. speaks of the antichrist setting himself up "in God's temple, proclaiming himself to be God." This concurs with Isaiah 14, where the antichrist is called "king of Babylon" and "the Assyrian" who exalts himself above the throne of God.
The antichrist didn't appear in 70 AD to exalt himself in the temple, nor did the Messiah reappear to put down the rule of Satan over the world. I admit my theory requires a lot to happen, soon and very soon. I believe the March on Jerusalem which happens today could very well set into motion the events where Jerusalem is surrounded by armies (not necessarily tanks, but rather warriors on foot) that culminates in the abomination.
I suggest that many will not believe it until it happens. But when it does happen, there will be a need for explanation.
Having my own interpretation solves nothing, just as it solves nothing for all these guys to have their own interpretation.
Originally posted by Alpha Arietis
I think it's a fair question.
The only answer is to examine it all for yourself to your own satisfaction and don't take anyone else's word for it.
Originally posted by Hydroman
Having my own interpretation solves nothing, just as it solves nothing for all these guys to have their own interpretation.
Now, christians claim that I don't understand the scriptures because the holy spirit is not guiding me to understand them. So, which of these guys is not being guided by the holy spirit? Are any of them? How do you know? See the dilemma?
Originally posted by Alpha Arietis
Hydroman,
I think it's a fair question.
The only answer is to examine it all for yourself to your own satisfaction and don't take anyone else's word for it.edit on 30-3-2012 by Alpha Arietis because: (no reason given)
According to your interpretation.
Originally posted by hab22
What I can tell you is this: things are falling into place for the fulfillment of Scripture.
The biblical prophecies are so vague that you can interpret them to mean so many different things, as is evident in this tiny thread. There are many, many more ideas out there than what is even shown here.
Originally posted by hab22
See, we are coming into a time of fulfillment and all will be made clear to those who want to know the truth and for those who want to come into relationship with the Eternal Godhead, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.
Originally posted by colbe
Originally posted by Alpha Arietis
Hydroman,
I think it's a fair question.
The only answer is to examine it all for yourself to your own satisfaction and don't take anyone else's word for it.edit on 30-3-2012 by Alpha Arietis because: (no reason given)
This doesn't work, no offense Alpha. God has revealed what the "abomination of desolation" is....
Malachi 1:11
For from the rising of the sun even to the going down, my name is great among the Gentiles, and in every place there is sacrifice, and there is offered to my name a clean oblation: for my name is great among the Gentiles, saith the Lord of hosts.
The "sacrifice" comes up again as written in Daniel but what's "in every place there is a sacrifice?" A priest offers sacrifice, we all agree. Every hour around the world the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is offered. The one time sacrifice of Our Lord is offered to the Father in an unbloody manner.
The "clean oblation" is the precious body and blood of Christ in the eucharistic sacrifice. The "abomination of desolation" takes
place when the anti-Christ abolishes the eucharistic sacrifice.
Why would the anti-Christ do this? The same reason Satanist's desecrate the Eucharist and mimic God with their black Masses.
Our Lord's presence in the Eucharist is true.
Originally posted by Hydroman
According to your interpretation.
Originally posted by hab22
What I can tell you is this: things are falling into place for the fulfillment of Scripture.
The biblical prophecies are so vague that you can interpret them to mean so many different things, as is evident in this tiny thread. There are many, many more ideas out there than what is even shown here.
Originally posted by hab22
See, we are coming into a time of fulfillment and all will be made clear to those who want to know the truth and for those who want to come into relationship with the Eternal Godhead, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.
Again, I ask you, how is an unbeliever like myself, who sits on the outside looking in, supposed to believe any of it? Yet, according to the bible, since I can't muster the faith to believe in it (which would possibly ensure that I ask for forgiveness from this god), I will burn for all eternity.....
Secondly, who is the holy spirit guiding here for the correct interpretation of the scripture, and how do you know?edit on 30-3-2012 by Hydroman because: (no reason given)
Not really. That story doesn't make any sense. Why would an omnipotent god need a human blood sacrifice in order to forgive sins when he could see that someone was truly sorry without shedding innocent blood? That seems so barbaric. If any other culture requested animal or human sacrifice of innocent creatures, it would be disgusting, yet when the biblical god requests it, it is ok...?
Originally posted by hab22
Start with Jesus and the cross. The basic truth of John 3:16 is an excellent place to start.
Originally posted by colbe
This doesn't work, no offense Alpha. God has revealed what the "abomination of desolation" is....
Malachi 1:11
For from the rising of the sun even to the going down, my name is great among the Gentiles, and in every place there is sacrifice, and there is offered to my name a clean oblation: for my name is great among the Gentiles, saith the Lord of hosts.
The "sacrifice" comes up again as written in Daniel but what's "in every place there is a sacrifice?" A priest offers sacrifice, we all agree. Every hour around the world the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is offered. The one time sacrifice of Our Lord is offered to the Father in an unbloody manner.
The "clean oblation" is the precious body and blood of Christ in the eucharistic sacrifice. The "abomination of desolation" takes
place when the anti-Christ abolishes the eucharistic sacrifice.
Why would the anti-Christ do this? The same reason Satanist's desecrate the Eucharist and mimic God with their black Masses.
Our Lord's presence in the Eucharist is true.
Originally posted by Hydroman
Not really. That story doesn't make any sense. Why would an omnipotent god need a human blood sacrifice in order to forgive sins when he could see that someone was truly sorry without shedding innocent blood? That seems so barbaric. If any other culture requested animal or human sacrifice of innocent creatures, it would be disgusting, yet when the biblical god requests it, it is ok...?
Originally posted by hab22
Start with Jesus and the cross. The basic truth of John 3:16 is an excellent place to start.
Furthermore, the biblical god came in human form and sacrificed his own self unto himself as an appeasement to himself for a rule he created. That doesn't make any sense. But, the bible does say that the scriptures are foolishness to those who are perishing. I guess that only means one thing.....
Originally posted by Alpha Arietis
Originally posted by colbe
This doesn't work, no offense Alpha. God has revealed what the "abomination of desolation" is....
Malachi 1:11
For from the rising of the sun even to the going down, my name is great among the Gentiles, and in every place there is sacrifice, and there is offered to my name a clean oblation: for my name is great among the Gentiles, saith the Lord of hosts.
The "sacrifice" comes up again as written in Daniel but what's "in every place there is a sacrifice?" A priest offers sacrifice, we all agree. Every hour around the world the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is offered. The one time sacrifice of Our Lord is offered to the Father in an unbloody manner.
The "clean oblation" is the precious body and blood of Christ in the eucharistic sacrifice. The "abomination of desolation" takes
place when the anti-Christ abolishes the eucharistic sacrifice.
Why would the anti-Christ do this? The same reason Satanist's desecrate the Eucharist and mimic God with their black Masses.
Our Lord's presence in the Eucharist is true.
I won't dispute that Malachi 1:11 is perhaps a reference to the Eucharist or Protestant Communion or both.
The verse doesn't, however "reveal what the 'abomination of desolation' is", as you claim. You have made that leap of logic yourself, at least in your post, by associating the sacrifice referred to in Daniel with the one referred to in Malachi.
I'm not of the belief that they refer to the same things.
As was pointed out in an earlier post, the "daily" referred to in Daniel 9:27, is slightly ambiguous. It's not necessarily the daily sacrifice.
The daily prayer at the Temple Mount, however, was an actual "stand in" for the daily sacrifice and certainly qualifies as being the "daily" spoken of by Gabriel. The prayer was cut off 3 1/2 years after Oslo, the seven year treaty, was signed, exactly as the prophecy said it would be ("in the middle of the "week"). These are facts that coincide perfectly with the prophecies that foresaw them.
These are also literal fulfillments, not metaphysical, or nebulous fulfillments.
I don't want to perish, but I can't muster the faith to believe as you do. There are many other beliefs out there as well, yet I don't believe them either, and some of them also say that I will be punished for not believing. Should I just pick one and hope for the best?
Originally posted by hab22
Why would you want to perish, and experience eternal death, Henchman, when the God of the universe whose nature is love offers you eternal bliss in a kingdom where there is no death and suffering? I don't understand why you blame God for sin, suffering and death. These were introduced into our world as a result of our forefather's rebellion against God.
Originally posted by hab22
Originally posted by colbe
Originally posted by Alpha Arietis
Hydroman,
I think it's a fair question.
The only answer is to examine it all for yourself to your own satisfaction and don't take anyone else's word for it.edit on 30-3-2012 by Alpha Arietis because: (no reason given)
This doesn't work, no offense Alpha. God has revealed what the "abomination of desolation" is....
Malachi 1:11
For from the rising of the sun even to the going down, my name is great among the Gentiles, and in every place there is sacrifice, and there is offered to my name a clean oblation: for my name is great among the Gentiles, saith the Lord of hosts.
The "sacrifice" comes up again as written in Daniel but what's "in every place there is a sacrifice?" A priest offers sacrifice, we all agree. Every hour around the world the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is offered. The one time sacrifice of Our Lord is offered to the Father in an unbloody manner.
The "clean oblation" is the precious body and blood of Christ in the eucharistic sacrifice. The "abomination of desolation" takes
place when the anti-Christ abolishes the eucharistic sacrifice.
Why would the anti-Christ do this? The same reason Satanist's desecrate the Eucharist and mimic God with their black Masses.
Our Lord's presence in the Eucharist is true.
How is the antichrist going to abolish the Eucharistic sacrifice, if the Eucharistic sacrifice is taking place all over the world?
If you read Daniel 8 through 12 from the NKJV and compare with an online Hebrew Lexicon, you will see that the word "sacrifice" does not appear in the text. The antichrist will abolish "the daily" , which is a reference to the daily rituals taking place at the temple site in Jerusalem. I would suggest that the daily rituals are the prayers made at the Western Wall where devout Jews gather daily.
The antichrist will overtake Jerusalem. He may try to put an end to Eucharistic sacrifices worldwide, but as long a there is a Mass being said in places that are out of his reach of authority, those Eucharistic sacrifices will continue throughout the 42 months of Great Tribulation.