It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by My.mind.is.mine
Please...
No more..... I can't take it....
This was enough 2 nights ago. Its not like the dialogue will change...
I vote to ban this story from the boards...
Originally posted by TheBlackManIsGod7
Would he be free and able to say it was self defense, or would he be in jail in an instance and have to prove it actually was self defense?
The presumption of innocence, sometimes referred to by the Latin expression Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat, is the principle that one is considered innocent until proven guilty. Application of this principle is a legal right of the accused in a criminal trial, recognized in many nations. The burden of proof is thus on the prosecution, which has to collect and present enough compelling evidence to convince the trier of fact, who is restrained and ordered by law to consider only actual evidence and testimony that is legally admissible, and in most cases lawfully obtained, that the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If reasonable doubt remains, the accused is to be acquitted.
Originally posted by My.mind.is.mine
Please...
No more..... I can't take it....
This was enough 2 nights ago. Its not like the dialogue will change...
I vote to ban this story from the boards...
Originally posted by Hawking
Then it would still deserve an investigation..
Does anyone really think the police shouldn't investigate this incident??
Originally posted by sonnny1
What would happen if Mr Zimmerman was given due process,and be held to the old premise..
Innocent until proven guilty ??
Originally posted by TheBlackManIsGod7
I also find it very funny that you have millions of prodominately caucasions around the world, who are vocal about their complete disguss regarding Joseph Kony. \.