It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Six Sigma
All three clearly have very loud explosions followed by the collapse.
Originally posted by jude11
Another thread trying to prove that the buildings came down in a natural fashion?
America was attacked from within. The proof is out there and actually in many threads on ATS.
And Thermite has been proven to be all over the place at ground zero. Many times.
I will never believe those buildings were taken down by inexperienced pilots using nothing but box cutters to hold off an entire plane load of people who knew they were going to die.
Peace
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
And FYI I believe that report has itself been debunked because of the impurity of the samples obtained due to it being so far from the actual location of the towers themselves. If not entirely accurate, my statement is not far from the mark. It did pass the revue here on ATS before.
Originally posted by Mandrakerealmz
Molecular Thermite or something like that in shape charges around internal supports might be quieter. Also something that wouldn't be practical for a normal controlled demolition if you just want to bring the building down.
Originally posted by jude11
I will never believe those buildings were taken down by inexperienced pilots using nothing but box cutters to hold off an entire plane load of people who knew they were going to die. Especially when many experienced pilots who have actually flown jets of the size used have stated that even they couldn't do it. And the Pentagon? Can't even go there...
Peace
edit on 27-3-2012 by jude11 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by Six Sigma
Fact: I read it in another thread that dealt with this exact paper.
Fact: I never mentioned thermite
Fact: The samples were taken within a month, hardly fresh "evidence"
Fact: See 1 again.
Fact: You appear to have an agenda on 9/11. All your threads and posts (with the exception of 2 posts when you first started posting) are on that subject. No passing interest in anything other than 9/11? Suspicious at best.
No, you have to explain how a 47 story building could fall mostly into its own footprint, as evidenced by post collapse pics. Pics prove the collapse was vertical, and landed mostly in its own footprint. That is what matters.