So NASA says THIS is a "1 millimeter dirt" in the lens of SOHO spacecraft, BUT...

i believe this may be related to the "alien invasion" thread in which supposed"alien spacecraft" can be seen all around the sun. i am not saying i dont believe this, im just typing it like that for non-believer's benefits. anyways, this could be an alien spacecraft, or dirt on the lens. whatever

reply to post by mindblower23

That's kind of like looking at an empty coffee cup, and thinking it COULD be full. In the end, it will remain empty until someone physically adds coffee to it.

See ya,
Milt

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by Pauligirl
No space ships, no aliens. But they did promise to let me know if they ever saw one.

And you believe them?

Wouldn't be any stranger than some of the other things believed around here.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Char-Lee

 

Right. Never mind that it has been discussed for several years right here.

Rather than remove it from the current images, they went back through thousands of previous images and added it.
That makes loads of sense.

They also aren't considering size.

Because if you do the ratios this thing would be bigger than Mars.

reply to post by 1AnunnakiBastard


They are hiding the fact that mark is burnt out part of the lens from a UFO.
What else reeks havoc with out natural senses.
All perfectly natural if you side with Tesla and his free energy flying machine.
The SOHO got zapped by a Rex Heflin exhaust ring.
And the UFO pilots know 100% what happens when the .01% tells them to do something.
Except NASA is left out of the loop.
ED: dirt, worm or Rex Heflin Teslaship exhaust ring
Don't mind the cartel agents.

Originally posted by Furbs

Originally posted by Char-Lee

Originally posted by Furbs
The idea that there have been 9 pages to discuss what is -obviously- a lens abnormality (dirt, a scratch, whatever) is troubling, but also very telling.

Where is your imagination and open mind? Mysteries abound all around us, it does not have to be the mundane explanation!

I concur. Mysteries abound. However, this is not one of them.

Keep an open mind, but don't let your common sense fall out.

You know saying that today is not the same as it used to be. Just look at things like the theory that we may be living in a virtual environment for instance. (many many sources in science sites not just off the wall websites.)


Not so crack pot.

"You may suppose ideas of this sort are eccentric beyond words - something so far fetched it would be too ludicrous to contemplate. However in today’s altered academic environment that now includes the String Theory, Chaos, Quantum mechanics, and time travel , the arrival of an idea like Ancestor Simulation is surprisingly sane and one that some scientists and philosophers are treating with a great deal of respect."

www.nasca.org.uk...

Originally posted by dainoyfb
reply to post by nineix

 

It doesn't even look like a spaceship!

Now that was funny Tell us what a spaceship looks like.

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by 1AnunnakiBastard

 

Why start a new thread when everything was explained in the previous thread?

Wilful ignorance and flag whoring?

you "stick to one thread" kinda guys are so damn linear it's pathetic. Learn how to multitask will ya?

Did anyone at any of the other threads ask where these "fibers and such" go? is there some sort of windshield wiper on the satellites? if not then where does this stuff come from and then where does it go if we don't see it any longer?

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by sapien82

 

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Sure fire him.
And fire the guy who messed up on the Hubble telescope too!

Thank you for your consideration.

edit on 3/26/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)

so then why wasn't it there from the beginning and where is it later? a vacuum system??? in space???

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Char-Lee

 

Right. Never mind that it has been discussed for several years right here.

Rather than remove it from the current images, they went back through thousands of previous images and added it.
That makes loads of sense.

Wouldn't be the first time NASA's been caught editing their images. Why are the images missing from the beginning of this thread? Did NASA take them down?

reply to post by bottleslingguy


As far as I'm aware, it's still there.

reply to post by Pervius


Are you for real?

You think NASA took down the OP's images?

reply to post by bottleslingguy

so then why wasn't it there from the beginning

How's 2006-12-27 for you?

and where is it later?

See it? This is from 2012-06-07.

reply to post by Phage


Yet the fiber never moves?

reply to post by DenyObfuscation


what about the six years between now and then? are you aware you just made the case for it leaving and returning after six years?

reply to post by Chadwickus

so then all NASA has to do is log every bit of contamination (should be tons of it by way these objects are popping up) on the lens or whatever it is and we wouldn't have all these false alarms. this stuff shouldn't appear out of nowhere only to disappear and then reappear etc. where's the logic in your argument?

reply to post by bottleslingguy

what about the six years between now and then?

STEREO, have at it.

are you aware you just made the case for it leaving and returning after six years?

I answered two questions you had. If you're gonna be a nozzle about it you can answer your own questions by reading the multiple gotdam threads.

reply to post by DenyObfuscation

obfuscate much???

reply to post by bottleslingguy


Clever much? Apparently not.

Obfuscate. After you learn what it means support your accusation.

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by bottleslingguy

 

Clever much? Apparently not.

Obfuscate. After you learn what it means support your accusation.

settle down Francis (that is a joke from the movie Stripes just in case)

I asked you if the object has been there everyday since '06 til now and instead of saying yes or no, you tell me to watch all six years for myself. how are you not being evasive or obfuscatory? do you or don't you know if the thing has been there all along, yes or no.