It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by JimmyJagov
When you are on private property and the one asking the question is the neighborhood watch guy...then he most certainly does have the right to ask him a question.
The FBI, the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Florida will investigate the killing of Trayvon Martin, an unarmed 17-year-old Florida high school student, who was shot by a self-appointed neighborhood watchman. "The department will conduct a thorough and independent review of all of the evidence and take appropriate action at the conclusion of the investigation," a statement released by the Justice Department this evening said. "The department also is providing assistance to and cooperating with the state officials in their investigation into the incident."
Keep in mind, Martin RAN from ZImmerman according to Zimmerman's 911 call.
If George Zimmerman was not close enough to Martin to ask him what he was doing there when he was on the phone with 911, how did he get so close to Martin afterwards?
Originally posted by TheXoor
Has this been posted yet? (sorry, not wading through sixty pages of this stuff).
If not, have a look. Not really all that cool, IMHO. Innocent until proven guilty and all that.
(I used photoshop to black out a few letters on the shirt so as to be in official compliance with ATS's no obsecnity rules.)
Originally posted by poet1b
TM ran around the corner. He told his girlfriend he wasn't going to run. There is nothing that proves TM was running from GZ.
Exactly, even if GZ took off running again, TM should have been quite a ways down the block. Look at the satellite map. If TM was shot on that little patch of grass just around the corner, it indicates that TM was waiting for GZ, after running around the corner. It shows that TM ambushed GZ.
My scenario is completely based on the evidence, and especially the two calls. We know TM runs around the corner, GZ starts to follow, then told he does not need to do that.
GZ makes arrangements to meet with the police officers, the phone call ends.
The body is found just around the corner from the police report, so that is where the confrontation takes place.
TM doesn't mention a truck,
so all indication are GZ walks around the corner, and that is when the confrontation takes place. From the GFs statement, it happens quickly, which sounds like TM ambushed GZ.
ow somebody away. But Florida’s law is different. Florida has a law, along with 17 states, that says you can stand your ground. Which means you don’t have that obligation to try to run first. So, in Florida, as long as you have a reasonable belief that your life and safety is in danger, you can use force to defend yourself, even deadly force. And now that’s the situation they’re suggesting.
Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by ker2010
Read the law....
ow somebody away. But Florida’s law is different. Florida has a law, along with 17 states, that says you can stand your ground. Which means you don’t have that obligation to try to run first. So, in Florida, as long as you have a reasonable belief that your life and safety is in danger, you can use force to defend yourself, even deadly force. And now that’s the situation they’re suggesting.
www.mediaite.com...
I don't have time to find the law for you today...do one research on your own.....the law us what it is like it or not.
(3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.
Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by MrWendal
How convenient for you , you only posted one part of the four part law....the one that fits your agenda...
He had no duty to retreat...hence the title of the law...STAND YOUR GROUND...it does not only pertain to your property and if you read the whole law you know that.
Sounds like the most logical turn of events....BECAUSE.....
If this kid was running away.....he would have been long gone....how in the world would GZ catch him....no way.
Could you please provide a copy of the audio file or transcript where others within this neighborhood asked Zimmerman to be an armed patrolman?
Originally posted by poet1b
Anything one decides to take on can be considered a job, from sweeping the garage to watching the neighborhood at the request of people in the fated community.
I said no such thing. I have not said what I think he is guilty of, or what he should be convicted of.
You claim GZ is guilty for exercising his own rights to watch over his neighborhood? You are wrong.
I am not twisting anything. Zimmerman took a life, and because of that, he does not deserve to walk free, without first proving beyond a reasonable doubt that his actions were justifiable. That is the bottom line.
Twist the story all you want, but this is what it comes down to.
That IS the evidence. You don't park your vehicle, and get out of it with a loaded gun, if your only intention is to simply watch.
Originally posted by poet1b
Originally posted by BrokenCircles
Zimmerman got out of his vehicle, with his gun, in order to pursue a stranger, and for no reason other than the fact that Trayvon looked suspicious.
Zimmerman got out of his vehicle with his gun as he has a right to do. There is no evidence that GZ intended to do anything but watch TM.
TM looking suspicious is all the reason that GZ needed.