It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
SUPERNOVA 2012aw IN M95 = PSN J10435372+1140177
Paolo Fagotti, Bastia Umbra, Italy, reports his discovery of a possible supernova (magnitude R = 15) near M95 = NGC 3351 on CCD images taken on Mar. 16.86 UT with a 0.5-m reflector (+ MX916 camera) at Porziano d'Assisi, Italy, the object measured to be located at R.A. = 10h43m53s.76, Decl. = +11d40'17".9 (equinox 2000.0 presumed).
A Type II supernova (plural: supernovae) results from the rapid collapse and violent explosion of a massive star. A star must have at least 9 times, and no more than 40–50 times the mass of the Sun for this type of explosion.[1] It is distinguished from other types of supernova by the presence of hydrogen in its spectrum. Type II supernovae are mainly observed in the spiral arms of galaxies and in H II regions, but not in elliptical galaxies.[2]
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
I looked on the discovery magazine website, and the video they have imbedded has been removed? Why? I hate when they remove things that are of great significance for further discussions. Obviously someone doesn't want us to see it...
M95 a Barred Spiral Galaxy located in the constellation Leo (next to Mars now). It has a peculiar core of strings clusters and currently several days ago a Super Nova has developed marked, Presently shines at magnitude 13 and is exspected to brighten more. Light reflections spikes due to Mars being close 1/2 deg. effected the image the inset is before without the SN. Same Equipment on both images and author.
M95 a Barred Spiral Galaxy located in the constellation Leo (next to Mars now). It has a peculiar core of strings of clusters and currently several days ago a Super Nova (2012aw) has developed marked, Presently shines at magnitude 13 and is exspected to brighten more. Light reflections spikes due to Mars being close 1/2 deg. effected the image the inset is before without the SN. Same Equipment on both images and author.
M95 imaged evening Mar 16th, showing SN 2012aw (can you spot it? see difference from previous image) 28x10min Luminance The streak is due to satellite in one of the frames Equipment: AP1200GTO; C11 EdgeHD @f/10, Atik 314L+ CCD, Astrodon Gen2E Luminance filter, Hutech OAG.
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by Vasa Croe
How can something like this be copyright? This is a universal issue, this just doesn't pertain to one particular entity whether it be NASA or whomever. Screw the copyright argument. What is really going on that they have to pull it?
Originally Posted by vinayjain
So what will be the effect of the energy librated and shockwave generated by the explosion on the black hole...............does black hole will be teared apart in this explosion.
No. The the gas and energy expelled from the explosion in the direction of the BH will form an accretion disc around the black and will fall in to be absorbed, causing it to grow in mass.
No external force will destroy a black hole.
Originally posted by underduck
reply to post by Vasa Croe
M95? Isnt there a black hole in that region supposedly. It would be fun to see some of this explosion interact with that.
Awesome fine Vasa Croe!
Originally posted by Vasa Croe
I wonder how many great pictures we will get of this Supernova?
Apparently iit is a Type II Supernova....sounds massive, but I don't know anything about Supernova so coule be wrong.
A Type II supernova (plural: supernovae) results from the rapid collapse and violent explosion of a massive star. A star must have at least 9 times, and no more than 40–50 times the mass of the Sun for this type of explosion.[1] It is distinguished from other types of supernova by the presence of hydrogen in its spectrum. Type II supernovae are mainly observed in the spiral arms of galaxies and in H II regions, but not in elliptical galaxies.[2]
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by Vasa Croe
How can something like this be copyright? This is a universal issue, this just doesn't pertain to one particular entity whether it be NASA or whomever. Screw the copyright argument. What is really going on that they have to pull it?