It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by krossfyter
Originally posted by Edgar806
I remember seeing an article that once said that antarctica was once located near the equator. If this is true then civilizations could have existed there and thats why a city is found there
there is a city found there?
Originally posted by quedup
This is from 2001 - there are lots of weird stories coming out of that place but if an ancient site had been found, I think we would have heard about it by now.
Guess it would be easy to keep it under wraps down there though.
Originally posted by Hyaena
You know, there's a theory that H.P. Lovecraft wasn't simply coming up with his stories, but was instead tapping into something real -- a different dimension, an ancient history, a host of horrible monsters that had, for whatever reason, chosen to reveal themselves to him alone.
At the Mountains of Madness is, hands-down, the scariest story I've ever read. I was flat-out crying when they found poor Gedney, and I didn't stop until the end. No story ever did that to me before, and none has since. The only one that has ever come close is Shadow Over Innsmouth, another Lovecraft creation.
My point is this: For the love of all that's holy, PLEASE let this be a hoax. Nothing -- and I mean nothing -- good can come of this. Yeah, Lovecraft was actually right about the supposed "Mountains of Madness" themselves -- the mountains so old and so large they sink into the ice.
And Bowie's "Scary Monsters and Super Creeps" just came on my iPod randomly, so I'm just going to stop. That's the kind of coincidence I don't like.
Originally posted by Logiciel
reply to post by rigel4
Hi RIGEL4
first of, appologies for the tone used.
I wasn't in a mood fit to be contributing to ATS and should have kept it to myself.
I guess a slight irritation was triggered by the relation betwin emphatic/dramatic aspect of the title of the thread and its content.
Not in terms of quality, but given all the recent activity at Vostok, I am part of the people awaiting with a lot of excitement any (improbable) news related to Vostok
I was a bit disapointed but should not have lacked courtesy.
Vostok is a mystery. I personally believe it holds some rather unexciting discoveries for a believer and very exciting discoveries for a scientist. It will help understand/confirm that earth is part of a galactic ecosystem.
I am also seduced by the ferrous meteorite theory/earth mantle bug as explanation for the magnetic anomaly. I would actually love to hear a scientist comment on the scientific data of this anomaly. I am sure a specialist has got to have an opinion on the subject.
All this said, if it turned up to be something that would question the establishement's beliefs, I would be the first to celebrate.
I must say that unfortunately, I fear it will be years before we hear anything about Vostok, specially if it's big.
Peace.edit on 20-3-2012 by Logiciel because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by ladyteeny
Well the fossil record shows homo sapiens has been around for about 200'000 years - not even the blink of an eye geologically.
Our earliest known ancestors go back to the late Miocene, around 5.3 million years ago.
So yes, i would say it is pretty unlikely and improbable that there is anything linked to humans from around 15 million years ago.
However, seeing as you wish to argue this, why not show the evidence that shows we have been around for that long? I would be happy if you could prove me wrong.
Originally posted by ladyteeny
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by ladyteeny
Well the fossil record shows homo sapiens has been around for about 200'000 years - not even the blink of an eye geologically.
Our earliest known ancestors go back to the late Miocene, around 5.3 million years ago.
So yes, i would say it is pretty unlikely and improbable that there is anything linked to humans from around 15 million years ago.
However, seeing as you wish to argue this, why not show the evidence that shows we have been around for that long? I would be happy if you could prove me wrong.
here you go, check out this thread.... the evidence that we've been around for that long is clear for those who wish to actually see it
www.abovetopsecret.com...&addstar=1&on=13732763#pid13732763
Originally posted by Submarines
Anything that comes from Richard Hogland,
Has to be taken with a grain of salt.