It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Evolutionsend
reply to post by getreadyalready
The outrage doesn't exist because as long as it's not affecting everyone, it's okay with the public, until it happens to them. We all stand there and watch thinking, "glad that's not me!"
Originally posted by Nite_wing
Me thinks you might be next. I admire your courage for the post and research. It shows resolve.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
Originally posted by Nite_wing
Me thinks you might be next. I admire your courage for the post and research. It shows resolve.
Ever since joining ATS I have often wondered about that same thought! Hopefully that's just paranoia as a result of reading too much of this stuff, I think I'm far too little of a fish to warrant any special attention.
Here's an example of how it's to late for us, we are all in the Rabbit Hole.
Lets say someone has written an OP about a Whistleblower and the information he has released.
What is the Number 1 Response to the OP?
"That guy isn't going to be alive for very long."
Originally posted by Q:1984A:1776
reply to post by getreadyalready
A POS crackhead gets beat down by a bunch of cops in '92, and riots spread across the nation. Conversely, so many people are aware of the erosion of our rights and blatant abuse by our government, and NOTHING is being done about it! Perhaps it's that most people refuse to see the truth right in front of them like the professor talked about in the OP. What about those of us who are able to understand what is going on? Why do we just sit around and complain on the internet, but do essentially nothing to bring those to justice who would commit such high crimes and prevent them from doing so to our successors.
C'mon people, we could at least do this:
Targeting the people who are responsible for such atrocities would be far better though:
edit on 15-3-2012 by Q:1984A:1776 because: (no reason given)