It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by randomname
reply to post by Petest205
to be fair, osama is dead and you're still bombing the sh-t out of them.
Originally posted by ironsjack
reply to post by JailTales
No, his crime is not being brown. His crime is spouting comments which were bound to incite racial hatred and by looking at some of the comments, it did. As i explained before, if i was to make the same comments, but vice versa and it offended Afghans in the UK and people got wind of it, then I would be treated exactly the same. The fact he has gone and slandered dead soldiers and hoped for every soldier to burn in hell is more than enough to be considered that. The same way that those scumbags burnt the poppy not so long ago.
reply to post by gladtobehere
Does the UK have a Bill of Rights or Constitution? Guess we shouldnt expect much from a nation which has a history deeply rooted in imperialism, conquest, gun confiscations and more surveillance cameras than any other nation on Earth.
Originally posted by Morg234
reply to post by gladtobehere
Does the UK have a Bill of Rights or Constitution? Guess we shouldnt expect much from a nation which has a history deeply rooted in imperialism, conquest, gun confiscations and more surveillance cameras than any other nation on Earth.
Yes, it does have a Bill of Rights, funnily enough it's called the Bill of Rights. Oh yes, "gun confiscations".
More surveillance cameras than any other nation? Wrong. Chicago has more surveillance systems than London.
But if this is coming from the nation of the CIA, TSA and SOPA, well then it was a waste responding to your troll post wasn't it.edit on 14/3/12 by Morg234 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ironsjack
He is inciting racial hatred as he is making comments or sharing an opinion which in turn can cause an inflammatory response related to race. Obviously it caused an inflammatory reaction and racist comments were probably exchanged, which was all because of his comment. As i've stated before, if i made the same comment related to this subject vice versa and it was reported i would be treated the same way.
search for the page "Azhar Ahmed scumbag!!"
Azhar Ahmed need to be killed for what he wrote on facebook the scum! people like this should not be in our county if their not going to support it! out with the scum!!!
Vaz Ahmed from Birmingham needs to be arrested for calling for the deaths of british troops
I bet the cops are wishing they didn't have to protect this lowlife... at least let 1 army veteran go in and knock the hell out of him, people like this shouldn't live on the planet never mind reside in our country!
.... but the memory will still be there in the minds of all that have liked this for the right cause, getting low life scum out of our country NO MATTER WHAT THE RACE!
Originally posted by sapien82
Yeh but our bill or rights was scribbled on a bloody napkin compared the actuall bill of rights in the US
Originally posted by sapien82
i think we are still using the magna carta as its basis and that didnt afford us much rights
under god and king !
Originally posted by sapien82
Im sure I've read the bill of rights we have , on my epic crusade into the freeman movement , which is interesting in itself. - another thread
Originally posted by sapien82
I would like to do the test also stu , but I think in on the side of caution we should employ a journalist to do it for us to highlight the potential pitfalls and failures in our laws and judical system.
what say you ?
that way we can not get directly involved
Originally posted by Maponos
reply to post by JailTales
Cos, in the same was he is being ignorant labeling all soldiers scum, others idiots may label all muslims terrorist and then they get hurt. You get it yet?
We try to protect minorities in this country, including from idiots within their own communities. Don't you agree there had to be some action taken in this instance to avert a possible backlash? given the high level of public attention this has received.edit on 14-3-2012 by Maponos because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ironsjack
Wow, that Kony comment shows how uneducated you are on the subject!
He is inciting racial hatred as he is making comments or sharing an opinion which in turn can cause an inflammatory response related to race.
Obviously it caused an inflammatory reaction
and racist comments were probably exchanged
which was all because of his comment.
As i've stated before, if i made the same comment related to this subject vice versa and it was reported i would be treated the same way.
FYI the "muslims against crusades" group who burnt the giant poppy were also charged on the same offence. Both caused exactly the same response.
FWIW the troops shouldn't even be in Afghanistan. All these people are doing when voicing their "opinions" or "extremist opinions" which is the correct term, are creating racial hatred. What's wrong with saying "I don't agree with the military action in Afghanistan, I don't like the way civilians have been treated and i hope they get pulled out of there soon", rather than "i hope they all burn in hell?". You see what i'm saying?