It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Anunaki10
Support this assertion with facts:
witnesses have been threatened to silence or killed
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Anunaki10
Support this assertion with facts:
witnesses have been threatened to silence or killed
...or leave.
YOU choose.
Make your 'case'....
Originally posted by wmd_2008
The kitchenfitters for the truth are disingenuious to say the least.
Lets have a look at an AFTT 9/11 video starring an old actor.
Go to 5:40 Richard (D**K to his friends) Gage says the building collapsed in 7 seconds well he needs his butt kicked because his film shows it takes a lot longer than that or it would if it wasn't edited to hide the fact lets have a look.
Go back to 3:09 on their video look at the roof look at what you see CLOSELY VERY CLOSELY.
Now compare with this video. Go to 2:52
Look at the roof and look at what you see open 2 windows put both windows side by side just in case you can't here is a pic.
The right hand side is a still from the aft lies video if you compare it to the left side from the other video one of the penthouses had already collapsed and was not shown by architects for the lies on their video
Also architects for the lies have reached just over 1600 out of how many worldwide
Architects are more concerned with the look, aesthetics,materials and functions of a building IT'S structural engineers that do the calculations re loadings etc, in fact in MOST structural engineering practices ARCHITECTS are their best customers I WONDER WHY
edit on 17-3-2012 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)
Government apologists have argued that WTC 7 took 13 or more seconds to collapse, thus disproving the "virtual free fall" argument. However, this argument entirely misses the point.
Why?
Because the videos show that the penthouse collapsed long before the main building. In fact, everyone admits that there was a delay of several seconds between the collapse of the penthouse and the collapse of the rest of the building.
"An object at rest tends to stay at rest". So once the movement stopped, it should have stayed stopped.
Therefore, the collapse of the main portion of building 7 - several seconds after the collapse of the penthouse stopped - should be treated as a discrete and new event (see discussion below).
Since the main building collapsed in approximately 7 seconds - the same time as a controlled demolition takes - that is strong evidence that WTC 7 was in fact demolished.
In its July 2008 Draft Report for Public Comment, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) initially claimed that Building 7 collapsed 40% slower than free fall acceleration.
Why would NIST want to say Building 7 did not experience free fall? NIST’s lead technical investigator, Shyam Sunder, stated in the WTC 7 technical briefing that free fall could only happen when an object “has no structural components below it.”[ii] The only way for a building to have no structural components below it is to remove the lower structural components with an external force such as explosives. If the upper part of a building is crushing its lower structural components, in other words, doing the work of removing them, not all of its energy will be converted into motion and its descent will not be free fall.
A high school physics teacher named David Chandler objected to NIST’s initial claim, pointing out that, based on video footage of Building 7’s destruction, NIST’s claim contradicted “a publicly visible, easily measurable quantity.”[iii] Mr. Chandler wrote a comment to NIST, saying, “Acknowledgement of and accounting for an extended period of free fall in the collapse of WTC 7 must be a priority if NIST is to be taken seriously.”[iv]
Responding to the criticism, NIST in its final report issued in November 2008 did finally acknowledge that Building 7 descended at free fall. According to NIST, “This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories, or 32.0 meters (105 ft), the distance traveled between times t = 1.75 s and t = 4.0 s [a period of 2.25 seconds].”[v] However, NIST did not attempt to explain how Building 7’s free fall descent could have occurred.
However, Mr. Chandler does explain how in Part 3 of his video, NIST Finally Admits Freefall, saying:[vi]
The stand-down order that Charles Lewis heard about was confirmed by none other than Norman Mineta, transportation secretary at the time.
According to the 9/11 Commission, Cheney didn't arrive underground at the PEOC (Presidential Emergency Operations Center) until almost 10 AM. Mineta, however, said the Vice President was already down there when he arrived at about 9:20 AM. Richard Clarke and Cheney's photographer indicated the same thing. That was before the Pentagon had been hit, and Mineta recalled a young man coming into the PEOC three times to tell Cheney how far out the plane was from Washington.
After the third report, according to Mineta, the young fellow asked, "Do the orders still stand?" and Cheney responded, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"
The 9/11 Commission chose to ignore Mineta's testimony and went so far as to remove it from the video archive"..read more
9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes
How did the U.S. Air Force respond on 9/11? Could it have shot down United 93, as conspiracy theorists claim? Obtaining 30 hours of never-before-released tapes from the control room of NORAD's Northeast head-quarters, the author reconstructs the chaotic military history of that day—and the Pentagon's apparent attempt to cover it up......
........The story of what happened in that room, and when, has never been fully told, but is arguably more important in terms of understanding America's military capabilities that day than anything happening simultaneously on Air Force One or in the Pentagon, the White House, or norad's impregnable headquarters, deep within Cheyenne Mountain, in Colorado. It's a story that was intentionally obscured, some members of the 9/11 commission believe, by military higher-ups and members of the Bush administration who spoke to the press, and later the commission itself, in order to downplay the extent of the confusion and miscommunication flying through the ranks of the government
The truth, however, is all on tape............
......................In the background, however, you can make out the sound of Jeremy Powell, then 31, a burly, amiable technical sergeant, fielding the phone call that will be the military's first notification that something is wrong. On the line is Boston Center, the civilian air-traffic-control facility that handles that region's high-flying airliners.
08:37:52
BOSTON CENTER: Hi. Boston Center T.M.U. [Traffic Management Unit], we have a problem here. We have a hijacked aircraft headed towards New York, and we need you guys to, we need someone to scramble some F-16s or something up there, help us out.
POWELL: Is this real-world or exercise?
BOSTON CENTER: No, this is not an exercise, not a test.
PLAY | PAUSE | STOP
Powell's question—"Is this real-world or exercise?"—is heard nearly verbatim over and over on the tapes as troops funnel onto the ops floor and are briefed about the hijacking. Powell, like almost everyone in the room, first assumes the phone call is from the simulations team on hand to send "inputs"—simulated scenarios—into play for the day's training exercise.
Originally posted by huh2142
reply to post by Danbones
The collapse of the penthouse and the main building cannot be treated as separate events. The penthouse continued to collapse while not being visible which lead to the remaining main building collapse. Are you suggesting that the penthouse stopped moving and was suspended in mid air?
It is my understanding that the Chandler free fall was of the facade. NIST did not include it until asked by Chandler because it added nothing of relevance to understanding of the initiation of the collapse. Gravity is the main driver of a collapse so observing moments of free fall acceleration are not totally unexpected. Free fall acceleration tends to be observed in the debris fall from the building.
The penthouse continued to collapse while not being visible which lead to the remaining main building collapse. Are you suggesting that the penthouse stopped moving and was suspended in mid air?
NIST WTC 7 Investigation Finds Building Fires Caused Collapse
Originally posted by Danbones
reply to post by Alfie1
ummm, maybe it was confirmed by a first person senior staffer?
The stand-down order that Charles Lewis heard about was confirmed by none other than Norman Mineta, transportation secretary at the time.
According to the 9/11 Commission, Cheney didn't arrive underground at the PEOC (Presidential Emergency Operations Center) until almost 10 AM. Mineta, however, said the Vice President was already down there when he arrived at about 9:20 AM. Richard Clarke and Cheney's photographer indicated the same thing. That was before the Pentagon had been hit, and Mineta recalled a young man coming into the PEOC three times to tell Cheney how far out the plane was from Washington.
After the third report, according to Mineta, the young fellow asked, "Do the orders still stand?" and Cheney responded, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"
The 9/11 Commission chose to ignore Mineta's testimony and went so far as to remove it from the video archive"..read more
www.opednews.com...
edit on 17-3-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by Danbones
reply to post by Alfie1
ummm, maybe it was confirmed by a first person senior staffer?
The stand-down order that Charles Lewis heard about was confirmed by none other than Norman Mineta, transportation secretary at the time.
According to the 9/11 Commission, Cheney didn't arrive underground at the PEOC (Presidential Emergency Operations Center) until almost 10 AM. Mineta, however, said the Vice President was already down there when he arrived at about 9:20 AM. Richard Clarke and Cheney's photographer indicated the same thing. That was before the Pentagon had been hit, and Mineta recalled a young man coming into the PEOC three times to tell Cheney how far out the plane was from Washington.
After the third report, according to Mineta, the young fellow asked, "Do the orders still stand?" and Cheney responded, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"
The 9/11 Commission chose to ignore Mineta's testimony and went so far as to remove it from the video archive"..read more
www.opednews.com...
edit on 17-3-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)
Perhaps you can direct me to where Mr Mineta confirmed a stand-down order ?
www.youtube.com...
Specifically, Mineta claims
from
NATIONAL COMMISSION ON TERRORIST ATTACKS UPON THE UNITED STATES
Public Hearing
Friday, May 23, 2003
Hart Senate Office Building
Room 216
Washington, DC
:www.9-11commission.gov...
"When I got to the White House, it was being evacuated. I met briefly with Richard Clark, a National Security Council staff member, who had no new information. Then the Secret Service escorted me down to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center, otherwise known as the PEOC."
***
I was made aware of it during the time that the airplane coming into the Pentagon. There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, "The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?" And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"
John Farmer just posted a document from the 9/11 Commission files that strongly supports Norman Mineta's public testimony before the 9/11 Commission. Here is the link:
forums.randi.org...
The document is a Secret Service log from 9/11, and confirms that the Secret Service was tracking American Airlines flight 77 as it approached Washington on September 11, 2001.
Farmer, who pursued the FOIA request for the 9/11 RADES radar data (released in October 2007) explains in his post that the radar data from 9/11 agrees perfectly with the Secret Service timeline. Farmer has the 9/11 radar data in his computer and has made it available to other 9/11 researchers.
The document was first made made public in January 2009 by NARA, along with many other 9/11 Commission files. Erik Larson posted it to Scrib in April 2009, where it may be downloaded:
www.scribd.com...
However, at the time, Erik overlooked the document's importance. Amazingly, it escaped notice for many months.
It may also be downloaded here (this is an easier download):
bluecollarrepublican.files.wordpress.com...
...........I have just received confirmation that the handwriting is actually that of 9/11 Commission staffer Miles Kara, who was granted access to the original Secret Service documents during the commission's official investigation. Kara was not allowed to remove the SS document, however, so he copied it long-hand.
Notice, this means that the 9/11 Commission had this information but chose to bury it, Why? Maybe to cover up for VP Dick Cheney? .
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by Danbones
You are just dancing around. Where, anywhere, does Mr Mineta acknowledge a NORAD stand-down order ? Please be specific.
on the morning of 9/11, the F-16's were performing bombing runs over an empty stretch of the Pine Barrens near Atlantic City after being decommissioned from their usual role of protecting the skies of the east coast.
1) OPERATION NORTHERN VIGILANCE: This was planned months in advance of 9/11 and ensured that on the morning of 9/11, jet fighters were removed from patrolling the US east coast and sent to Alaska and Canada, therefore reducing the amount of fighter planes available to protect the east coast.
2) BIOWARFARE EXERCISE TRIPOD II: Alex Jones first reported on this back in May when Rudolph Giuliani let the details of it slip in his testimony to the 9/11 Commission. FEMA arrived in New York on September 10th to set up a command post located at Pier 29 under the auspices of a 'biowarfare exercise scheduled for September 12. This explains why Tom Kenney of FEMA's National Urban Search and Rescue Team, told Dan Rather of CBS News that FEMA had arrived in New York on the night of September 10th. This was originally dismissed as a slip of the tongue. Giuliani was to use this post as a command post on 9/11 after he evacuated WTC Building 7. As we reported back in January, Giuliani knew when to leave WTC 7 because he got advanced warning that the Trade Towers were about to collapse. "We were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was gonna collapse," Rudolph Giuliani told Peter Jennings of ABC News. How did Giuliani know the towers were about to collapse when no steel building in history had previously collapsed from fire damage?
3) OPERATION VIGILANT GUARDIAN: This exercise simulated hijacked planes in the north eastern sector and started to coincide with 9/11. Lt. Col. Dawne Deskins, NORAD unit's airborne control and warning officer, was overseeing the exercise. At 8:40am she took a call from Boston Center which said it had a hijacked airliner. Her first words, as quoted by Newhouse News Service were, "It must be part of the exercise." This is another example of how the numerous drills on the morning of 9/11 deliberately distracted NORAD so that the real hijacked planes couldn't be intercepted in time.
4) OPERATION NORTHERN GUARDIAN: The details of this exercise are still scant but it is considered to be part of Vigilant Guardian, relating to simulating hijacked planes in the north eastern sector.
5) OPERATION VIGILANT WARRIOR: This was referenced in Richard Clarke's book 'Against All Enemies'. It is thought to have been the 'attack' component of the Vigilant Guardian exercise.
Another example of how air defenses were purposefully kept preoccupied so they couldn't protect New York was reported by this website in December of 2003. The Air National Guard's 177th Fighter Wing, based at Atlantic City International Airport in Pomona, were just eight minutes away from New York and could have intercepted both Flight 11 and Flight 175.
Under NORAD procedures that date to the Cold War, two F-16 fighters from the 177th were parked around the clock on the Atlantic City runway. Pilots waited in a nearby building, ready to scramble.
But on the morning of 9/11, the F-16's were performing bombing runs over an empty stretch of the Pine Barrens near Atlantic City after being decommissioned from their usual role of protecting the skies of the east coast.
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by Danbones
So you can't demonstrate that Mr Mineta ever confirmed a NORAD stand-down order.
In fact it was quite the reverse. He testified about fighters being scrambled from Langley and that he learned of a shoot-down order.
Now you want to drift off into cancelled drills, I wonder why.
do the orders still stand
Originally posted by Danbones
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by Danbones
So you can't demonstrate that Mr Mineta ever confirmed a NORAD stand-down order.
In fact it was quite the reverse. He testified about fighters being scrambled from Langley and that he learned of a shoot-down order.
Now you want to drift off into cancelled drills, I wonder why.
do the orders still stand
what order was that alfie?
where is the transcript referencing your opinion?
and please show that NORAD was functioning as mandated
( i guess the standing order refered to by Mineta was preventing that obviously because they never delt with the aircraft that hit the pentagon...it hit the pentagon)
you haven't....
I wonder why?
you just dance around the reality with semantic obfuscationsedit on 17-3-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)
i repeat alfie
WHAT ORDER WAS THAT ALFIE?edit on 17-3-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)
top gun pilot instructors who actually flew aircraft involved:
"flying the aircraft involved" means nothing.
Commander Ralph “Rotten” Kolstad
23,000 hours
27 years in the airlines
B757/767 for 13 years mostly international Captain with American Airlines.
20 years US Navy flying fighters off aircraft carriers, TopGun twice
civilian pilot flying gliders, light airplanes and warbirds
Command time in:
- N644AA (Aircraft dispatched as American 77)
- N334AA (Aircraft dispatched as American 11)