New Footage 9/11 Second Tower Explosion Incredibly Clear Video From Helicopter - Where Is The Plane?

reply to post by zorgon


I am LOL'ing at that "lawsuit" filing.

Looky here:

VII. THE DEFENDANTS’ SCHEME

50. The destruction of the WTC on September 11, 2001, was caused, in whole or in part, by the use of Directed Energy Weapons, consisting in High Energy Lasers and or other operational, but largely secret weapons that are, nonetheless, known to exist and known to have been deployed and/or deployable in the year 2001, before and after.

Total nonsense.

Where have all the "DEWs" gone, since this? (Since the complaint says they are "known to exist"?? By whom? Who "knows"??)

Why weren't they used in Iraq? Why hasn't Iran been taken down, reduced to rubble?

Or North Korea? China? This magic device could destroy all of the Chinese ICBMs in their silos, one whoud imagine.


The USA would be the supreme, and completely and utterly the most powerful force to reckon with on this planet.


And somehow, these "magical weapons" did not have any collateral impact on any of the surround buildings? The only collateral damage was from the debris, from the collapses themselves. Collapses that were self-initiated, due to the severe structural damage from airplane impacts, and uncontrolled fires.


Finally, what was the disposition of this frivolous lawsuit? Was it tossed out, much like the April Gallop nonsense?

(Was Judy Woods a party to this filing, and this insanity??)


Ah yes.....this nonsense was thrown out on its butt:

On June 26, 2008, Judge George B. Daniels dismissed three 9/11 law suits with prejudice, including my “no planes crashed at the WTC” lawsuit against NIST contractors. My conclusion? Disappointment but no surprise.

Reynolds Answers Judge Daniels’ Dismissal


Was this all a side-show? For Judy Woods, Stephen Jones, this Reynolds nutbag, and the other assorted nitwits? Certainly is entertaining, even as it is a waste of the Court's time, and taxpayer money.

reply to post by zorgon


Unfortunately, the case was dismissed in 2010 by the SCOTUS. How come I'm not surprised ...

Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by Alfie1

 

Please, show me a picture of a plane flying into the 2nd tower.

Please, show me a picture of a plane flying into the 2nd tower.

I did.

I did.

So have lots of other posters.

If you are trying to make some abstruse point it has escaped me.

reply to post by ProudBird


Just asking you Proud Bird, does anything at all strike you as odd about the OS regarding 911?
Does anything smell off to you at all about how all this crap happened?

Serious question and I am waiting for a serious reply.

If you are as you say a pilot and have 40 years experience flying then you must have some reservations about the OS?

Last I heard you don't get to be a pilot if your blind or have any mental issues.

Regards, Iwinder

Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by Alfie1

 

Please, show me a picture of a plane flying into the 2nd tower.

Please, show me a picture of a plane flying into the 2nd tower.

No matter.. (well. it does matter) who's really responsible *cough*!! The second hit, a plane did hit. Be it plane loaded with extra fuel,or with whatever - or a missile before the plane hit, or premature detonations (i believe that!)... there still was a plane.

Originally posted by wfaherty
Real simple
Not a news video,not a tape,my mind remembering what I saw.
As i write this I can still see the jumbo jet first fly over me and then curve around the harbor and head for the WTC.
I was working on the roof of a building in Newark,NJ on Sept 11th 2001 and I saw the second plane hit the south tower, 2 World Trade Center at or about the 77th floor skylobby
I used to work for a Mechanical contractor and did work(hvac,construction) on the 76 th floor of the south tower.

SO A PLANE DID HIT THE SOUTH TOWER AND 8 FRIENDS OF MINE DIED!!
Stop the BS theories.

Would you be so kind as to provide names and photographs?

I am 99% sure you will provide neither!

Originally posted by Laxpla
It was a missile hitting the WTC, videos are fake and CGI of planes hitting the WTC. The Reptilians control the government which was ultimately behind 9/11. I have seen videos and pictures on the internets that tells me that, don't try and tell me otherwise debunking me as I wont listen to your reasoning and will just offer different pictures and videos recorded on a cell phone from a tube tv that shows why I'm right.

Finally!!
You have seen the light.
Welcome home brother!
You want to go chat in the hologram forum tonight?

Originally posted by bastardo
The impact of the crashing buildings sent a shockwave through the ground and opened up an undergronud hole that exposed an ancient coal layer wich cought on fire caused by the still burning office furniture.

Do you have any link to show it? Keep in mind that there are too many "holes" in the official 911 report. Witnesses also claim there were explosions moments before the planes hit the Towers.

Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory - Pentagon
Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory - 9/11 Part 1
Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory - 9/11 Part 2
Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory - 9/11 Part 3
Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory - 9/11 Part 4
Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory - 9/11 Part 5
9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out

Evidence of Nano Thermite explosives have been found, and they are talking about TONS of this Nano Thermite explosive material that reportedly caused all 3 buildings to collapse, and the experts speculate it was NOT the airplanes that caused the buildings to collapse, but the Nano Thermite explosives that caused the buildings to collapse. Beside, NO airplane crashed into WTC7...

For accompanying texts, Google "pothole WTC"
If you believe that text, is up to you.

Btw, that second plane impact is on confirmed trustworthy videos, you'd better choose Google Video or other more reliable video sources.
You Tube is littered with CGI'd garbage.
There is also a huge repository available from the NIST investigation pages, with all the official videos from the news networks and private sources.

Unbelievable, I have read the first page, and this now last one, and I'm amazed by the waste of time.
And I am a true global history, 3 decades long truth seeker, but some of you guys can hit rock bottom in an instance.
What a waste of my precious time.

Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by Alfie1

 

Please, show me a picture of a plane flying into the 2nd tower.

Please, show me a picture of a plane flying into the 2nd tower.

From two pages back....

Originally posted by digitalf

Considering the inconvenient fact that the AGM-158 JASSM was not even in production on 9/11 and the detonation of its 450 kg warhead manifests itself in an entirely different (and much less energetic) process than what is seen in the myriad of forensic evidence, you may want to rethink your position.



Read the NIST World Trade Center Disaster Study and 9/11 Commission Report and learn a bit about aeronautics and structural engineering.

You might find yourself reconsidering your misgivings regarding the 9/11 OS.

reply to post by Iwinder


What I "smell" is the cover-up.......the covering up of the fact that there were inter-agency squabbling and turf wars, and a complete lack of communication between the NSA, CIA and FBI (to name only three)....and the ultimate failure which rests squarely on the shoulders of President Bush, and others in the White House, for allowing the intelligence gaffes to become so overt as to lead to this disaster.

THAT is what has been hidden, for the last decade. Each and every convoluted and more ridiculous "conspiracy theory", from magical "hush-a-boom explosives" planted by teams of secret Ninjas, to the Judy Woods of this world, and her "DEW" claims, to the "missiles" to the "No planes at all", and to all the other loads of complete nonsense....too many "theories" to name them all.


The timing and execution of those four teams of hijackers (and there is some indication of a possible fifth team that was thwarted....unknowingly, while they were still on the ground, at JFK. On United 23.

Video:




Checking the BTS statistics, United 23 did not take off that morning....the shut-down of airspace was going into effect, and also JFK (as well as Newark) were ceasing operations even before the Nationwide order was given.

United 23 was also a trans-con flight, from JFK to LAX, and a Boeing 767. Scheduled departure time from JFK was 09:00.


Now, as to the actual carrying out the hijackings, there is simply no reason to suspect anything other that the way it occurred, from looking at all of the information. To include, the radar recordings that have been published (and that [idirectly refute the "no planes" nonsense).

IN fact, to single out United 175 (point of this thread), in that case the transponder was still on, it was left on by the hijackers, only thing they did was to change its squawk code. But since it was transmitting, the basic info was on the radar, including the altitude reporting function. The radar system computers calculated speed. All that happens when the four-digit code is changed, and then not recognized as an active Flight Plan in the ATC computer system is, the details as to flight number and airplane type, and departure/destination information aren't included on the radar screen Data Block.

Finally, for the Towers (and even Building 7), the collapses are satisfactorily explained by their unique and specific designs, along with the severe damage, both from the impact of the airplanes (Towers 1 & 2), and then the collateral debris from the North Tower that impacted Building 7.....that damage, combined with the fires that went un-fought, and uncontrolled.

Originally posted by LaBTop
For accompanying texts, Google "pothole WTC"

So what do you make out of it? Do you speculate it was this socalled "Pothole" that caused all 3 buildings to collapse, or do you think it was the Nano Thermite explosives that caused the buildings to collapse?

Originally posted by LaBTop

For accompanying texts, Google "pothole WTC"
If you believe that text, is up to you.

Btw, that second plane impact is on confirmed trustworthy videos, you'd better choose Google Video or other more reliable video sources.
You Tube is littered with CGI'd garbage.
There is also a huge repository available from the NIST investigation pages, with all the official videos from the news networks and private sources.

Unbelievable, I have read the first page, and this now last one, and I'm amazed by the waste of time.
And I am a true global history, 3 decades long truth seeker, but some of you guys can hit rock bottom in an instance.
What a waste of my precious time.

edit on 14/3/12 by LaBTop because: (no reason given)

But those are suppose to be molten rock from an iceage 20,000 years ago

reply to post by Anunaki10


I do not think anything of it now, what I see is an old ice age pothole (they say), that they were filling with concrete.
But why not fill it up totally, the plastic is normally used to let it cure and to keep a bit of rain out perhaps. Not huge rains, that will fill the hole up with rain water.
Why not fill it up all at once, the rest of the soil is also bedrock, so why must it be re-barred with steel?

Where I am highly interested in, is the exact longitude and latitude data of that hole.

Originally posted by LaBTop

How about the planes, what do you make out of them?

Originally posted by Swing80s
I've got a weird story for you guys... So I was at an AA meeting and there was this ex-prison inmate that was talking about his addiction etc... Then he offhandedly mentioned 9/11 and the fact that the government wants you to believe it happened in 2001 but it really didn't... So I was like WTF?? Anyways during a smoking break I went to ask him about what he was talking about and this is what he claimed happened, even though it was obvious that this guy wasn't very smart at all, didn't know much about conspiracies, but he said this is what happened to him as fact:



He said during the year 2000 while he was in prison he was being transferred to another prison facility along with a bunch of other inmates on a bus. While they were in the bus the driver claimed there was something wrong with buses engine and that it had to stop over at some maintainence facility to repair it. They were in WA and he said the bus drove them out into the middle of nowhere in the forest where the bus repair station was. He said that him and the rest of the inmates had to wait in the parked bus for hours while still being shackled in their cage. Then some guards came to the bus and said there was something going on in NY and that they all needed to get out and follow him. The guards led them to a facility where there were other prisoners inside and huge T.V. screens where they were all told to sit down and watch the news on these giant screens. Anyways he said they all watched this news of the supposed 9/11 attacks for hours and all the prisoners were aghast and horrified. After hours of watching that they were led back to the prison bus where they waited for even more hours shackled inside. Finally the driver said it was "repaired" and they took the bus he was in along with the other prisoners to the prison they were being transfered to. Anyways when they got to their new prison him and the other people that were shown this news started going around asking all the other inmates what the hell was going on in N.Y. while they were locked in the bus for those extra hours and to their surprise all the other inmates were looking at them confused asking them "what the hell THEY were talking about?". All the inmates at his new prison said nothing was going on in N.Y. and everything was normal. Mind you this was in the year 2000. Anyways he said next year when 9/11 actually happened he was going around and telling all the other inmates that he'd already seen this a year ago and since they were watching it live they looked at him as if he was crazy...



Now this guy was very obviously intellectually challenged but he was completely adamant about his story and the fact that "9/11" really happened in the year 2000 and that all of us "regular" people on the "outside" didn't know the whole story. Now I don't think a guy like this could make something like this up or I don't even know why he would want to. But he swears up and down that it happened on the year 2000 but can't back up why with any logical answers because like I told you he's mentally deficient.

That got me thinking, maybe this guy along with these other inmates that were forced to watch whatever they were shown were maybe test subjects or guinea pigs to take a sample of peoples reaction to this false flag event if indeed it was a false flag. I mean if you think about it they would make the perfect test subjects to study because on the outside if they went to tell somebody, anybody, of what they were shown NOBODY would believe them and they would take their story with a grain of salt; because after all these people are just crazy, stupid ex-junky criminal inmates that nobody cares about...

Thanks for posting this. Most 9/11 footage is faked and this story certainly makes sense.
The prisoners were the perfect test audience, for the reasons you have offered!

We were duped (and are being duped) on the biggest scale imaginable!
9/11 wasn't the first nor the last Faked event.

www.septemberclues.info
www.cluesforum.info

Wake The F**k Up People. 9/11 was a Fakery Extravaganza.

Originally posted by LaBTop
I do not think anything of it now, what I see is an old ice age pothole (they say), that they were filling with concrete.
But why not fill it up totally, the plastic is normally used to let it cure and to keep a bit of rain out perhaps. Not huge rains, that will fill the hole up with rain water.
Why not fill it up all at once, the rest of the soil is also bedrock, so why must it be re-barred with steel?

Where I am highly interested in, is the exact longitude and latitude data of that hole.

Okay, so you are just posting about this "pothole". When did they fill this "pothole" with concrete? Was this "pothole" there all the time untill and after the collapse of the Twin Towers? And how about the WTC7? Is there any "pothole" just under were WTC7 building was? You also have to keep in mind that NO airplane crashed into WTC7.

reply to post by Corruptedstructure

But those are suppose to be molten rock from an iceage 20,000 years ago

Ice age and molten do not cope too best together, ain't it?
Former volcanism and molten does. Go look up, when were the last confirmed volcanism signs found in Manhattan rock. A tad bit longer ago than that last glacier that rolled over Manhattan rocky soil.

You did not follow my advice, obviously, because that text does explain that they say that the hole was grind out by a huge glacier.

That's a damn curious glacier, it must have vertical vortex properties, because the rest of the rock hard bedrock you see all around it, is not grind down.

And when you use your ability for making logic conclusions, you see in the back, broken concrete walls, that go all the way down to that same level of bedrock, so logic tells you, that that was the bedrock where this tower was build on at its erection in the 70ies.

Here it comes, hold your seat :
WHY DID THEY NOT EQUALIZE THAT POTHOLE AT THAT TIME,
WITH THE REST OF THAT BEDROCK LEVEL ?

Do you really think that any sane architect would not fill up that huge hole when he started to lay the foundations?

reply to post by ProudBird

Thanks for your take on the situation, So you doubt the OS just like we all do just in a different manner so to speak.
I thought for sure you would mention the lack of interception capabilities since they were there and were capable of doing just that.

I also wonder on your thoughts on the pristine passport which fell to the ground and was neither scorched nor marred by the millions of tons of debris falling on it.


What are your thoughts on the E-Coli being spread around by our very own govenments ?
Thanks again,
Regards, Iwinder

Clearly this is psyop subterfuge people. Don't buy into it. Two planes crashed into the Twin Towers. Stick to the facts not the outlandish theories. There's plenty of legitimate sources who question the "official" story with plenty of evidence.

9/11 was an inside job.