New Footage 9/11 Second Tower Explosion Incredibly Clear Video From Helicopter - Where Is The Plane?

I didn't look at the video because I saw it happen in real time. Of course there was a second plane. Do you realize how many New Yorkers actually watched this take place??????????????????

reply to post by Inculpatus


Hi and welcome to ATS. I see this was your first post,
did you join just to post to this thread?

I would imagine that your 9/11 experience would be traumatic
if you were in New York at the time it happened, what kind of a plane did you
see?

Thanks again, and welcome to ATS.

The video in the original post is obviously tampered with.

It is SO obvious that I could only imagine it was done by an OS believer trying to make 911 truthers appear stupid. This is a common tactic.

You'll find alot of "9/11 truthers" coming up with some really off the wall theories, one has to think they are just trying to misdirect, or they aren't playing with a full deck.

I believe the video in the OP is pure misdirection, to get people talking about an issue that has nothing to do with the actual crimes committed on 9/11.

reply to post by ArchPlayer


You're right. CS5.5, you don't even have to manually sample from other areas as with old AVID, etc. Point and click and its done.

Originally posted by KaelemJames


I know i saw a 2nd plane hitting the building, live, in real time. I am a truther, but, i don't believe we live in the matrix.

Hi, and thanks for your comments,

Can you describe the plane you saw that day on 9/11?
Did you see a plane crash into the first tower, and the second tower?

reply to post by Neojournalist


Which is possible, and yes we have discussed that in the thread ...
however its been clearly shown that you can edit in a plane just as
easily. So, since the first three minute clip of this did not surface until 2010,
is it possible that a plane was edited in, as well as its possible it was edited out?

It's sad that our politicians thought that they had "dumbed down" the American people enough to think that we would eat the B.S. and drink the kool-aid that was "served" to us during this tragic event.
There is definitely more than enough proof that these two buildings were brought down, on purpose, with explosives, etc. And to me, the icing on the cake was the event of building #7. You have the owner/renter admitting on video that it was decided "to pull" the building. How convenient that there just happened to be explosives already in place to cause the imploding of building #7 to happen on 911, especially when there was absolutely nothing wrong with this building. Which Bush brother was in charge of security at #7?

As for the video in this topic, it just doesn't seem right, something just doesn't fit.

So I guess the guy I was talking to on the phone watching it all happen live in person from across the river in New Jersy was a mossad plant specially hired to convince just me that there was a terrorist attack underway.



Rubbish! Moving on....

How about some higher quality videos?

From NBC Live broadcast:


NIST FOIA Release - WNBC Dub10 #48:


Close up:


Here's the original WNBC Broadcast:

*Reply retracted*

Originally posted by Swing80s
I've got a weird story for you guys... So I was at an AA meeting and there was this ex-prison inmate that was talking about his addiction etc... Then he offhandedly mentioned 9/11 and the fact that the government wants you to believe it happened in 2001 but it really didn't... So I was like WTF?? Anyways during a smoking break I went to ask him about what he was talking about and this is what he claimed happened, even though it was obvious that this guy wasn't very smart at all, didn't know much about conspiracies, but he said this is what happened to him as fact:

He said during the year 2000 while he was in prison he was being transferred to another prison facility along with a bunch of other inmates on a bus. While they were in the bus the driver claimed there was something wrong with buses engine and that it had to stop over at some maintainence facility to repair it. They were in WA and he said the bus drove them out into the middle of nowhere in the forest where the bus repair station was. He said that him and the rest of the inmates had to wait in the parked bus for hours while still being shackled in their cage. Then some guards came to the bus and said there was something going on in NY and that they all needed to get out and follow him. The guards led them to a facility where there were other prisoners inside and huge T.V. screens where they were all told to sit down and watch the news on these giant screens. Anyways he said they all watched this news of the supposed 9/11 attacks for hours and all the prisoners were aghast and horrified. After hours of watching that they were led back to the prison bus where they waited for even more hours shackled inside. Finally the driver said it was "repaired" and they took the bus he was in along with the other prisoners to the prison they were being transfered to. Anyways when they got to their new prison him and the other people that were shown this news started going around asking all the other inmates what the hell was going on in N.Y. while they were locked in the bus for those extra hours and to their surprise all the other inmates were looking at them confused asking them "what the hell THEY were talking about?". All the inmates at his new prison said nothing was going on in N.Y. and everything was normal. Mind you this was in the year 2000. Anyways he said next year when 9/11 actually happened he was going around and telling all the other inmates that he'd already seen this a year ago and since they were watching it live they looked at him as if he was crazy...

Now this guy was very obviously intellectually challenged but he was completely adamant about his story and the fact that "9/11" really happened in the year 2000 and that all of us "regular" people on the "outside" didn't know the whole story. Now I don't think a guy like this could make something like this up or I don't even know why he would want to. But he swears up and down that it happened on the year 2000 but can't back up why with any logical answers because like I told you he's mentally deficient.

That got me thinking, maybe this guy along with these other inmates that were forced to watch whatever they were shown were maybe test subjects or guinea pigs to take a sample of peoples reaction to this false flag event if indeed it was a false flag. I mean if you think about it they would make the perfect test subjects to study because on the outside if they went to tell somebody, anybody, of what they were shown NOBODY would believe them and they would take their story with a grain of salt; because after all these people are just crazy, stupid ex-junky criminal inmates that nobody cares about...

Very interesting 'Swing80s', this is very interesting, i don't think you're lying, i don't think you made up this story, i think you are talking the truth. There are so much weird things going on that blows the mind.

First i want to mention about when George W. Bush Jr. reportedly visited a school at the time the planes hit the Twin Towers. This video clip shows George W. Bush claim he saw the plane hit the Twin Towers on TV the same day, but the commentator says that's impossible, because the footage of the planes hitting the Twin Towers were first shown on the TV news the next day... And i keep asking myself >What the heck is going on here???< whatreallyhappened.com...

You may have heard the strange story of how George Bush claimed to have seen the first plane hit the World Trade Tower on a television in Booker Elementary School before going into a classroom to hear some children read. This is a strange story because there were no live broadcasts of this impact.

Still stranger was Bush's reaction on being told of the second impact by chief of staff Andrew Card. There was none. Bush simply went on with the school visit and listened to children reading about a pet goat. For twenty minutes.

But far more telling than Bush's reaction is that of Card himself who, as can be seen in the above clip, steps in to inform Bush of the second impact (without mentioning the fact that more hijacked planes were in the air), then immediately steps back without waiting for a reply. Bush's job is to make decisions. How does Card know that Bush will not make one then and there?

What damns the Bush administration is not what is in this video, but what SHOULD be in the video and is not. Ostensibly, Bush and Card are reacting to a surprise attack, but Card acts like he is delivering a progress report to which he knows there will be no immediate response rather than unexpected news, and Bush does NOT act surprised!

“I remember once the Secret Service thought they had another threat and tried to get the president to leave,” [Karen Hughes, a senior counselor to George W. Bush] said. “And he insisted that he wasn’t leaving. I'll never forget, he said: >>In fact, I’m hungry. I want a hamburger.What kind of TV did George W. Bush Jr. watch the plane hitting the Twin Towers the same day, just before he entered the school class room? Did he have a special kind of TV and video equipment? Did/does the National Security have the first priority to get the TV news the same day and time and show it to George W. Bush? Or was George W. Bush watching video footage of drill / tests of "plane crashing into Twin Towers"? Or what kind of video footage did George W. Bush watch?

reply to post by lunarasparagus


Thanks,

Just listened and watched all of those. Unfortunately,
that just raises more questions, as even the newscasters that
saw them said they were not large planes, not 747, 757, 767.

How do we explain that?

Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by lunarasparagus

 

Thanks,

Just listened and watched all of those. Unfortunately,
that just raises more questions, as even the newscasters that
saw them said they were not large planes, not 747, 757, 767.

How do we explain that?

edit on 14-3-2012 by burntheships because: (no reason given)

All the newscasaters ? Show me please.

It's a missile concealed within the plane, much like what happened with the US Cole bombing with the missile in the speedboat, and many other covert operations. It's the only realistic explanation.

In this video you can clearly see the plane penetrates through the entire building and doesn't explode until it's passed through! You can clearly see the warhead coming out the northern facade before it explodes, which is the exact behaviour of a penetrator warhead with timed delay. The military invest millions and years of research to do just this.

I guess the miscalculated by a few milliseconds, hence it passing all the way through, perhaps they expected it to hit the core square of where it would of met more resistance.

reply to post by Insolubrious


I see a plane in that "Great Quality", "1080p" video you provided. No missile there.

It did explode when it had to, see nothing odd as the guy trying to make the point in the video is wrong.

you can see a plane in the top right corner around 2:15, and if you follow it with your mouse cursor at the same relative speed after it disappears, the left tower explodes right when your mouse hits the left side of the tower. its obvious that someone edited out the plane from the video.

reply to post by burntheships


Is this thread still going on??

How can anyone make such outrageous claims, about "editing in" airplanes in the videos?? When there are countless eye-witness testimonies?

And, there were many, many alternate angles of video taken, live as it happened. And, not just by media.

Many private citizens had their personal video cameras focused on the WTC Towers.

This nonsense has been hashed to death, over and over here on ATS (and elsewhere). But, like a new "toy" just "discovered", here comes another who sees the ideas as somehow "new"....when they are old and buried, long ago.


Thread = D.O.A.

Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by lunarasparagus

 

Thanks,

Just listened and watched all of those. Unfortunately,
that just raises more questions, as even the newscasters that
saw them said they were not large planes, not 747, 757, 767.

How do we explain that?

edit on 14-3-2012 by burntheships because: (no reason given)

Wait, you're saying that in the heat of the crisis, newsreaders said things that weren't true?

No way.

reply to post by ProudBird

Yesterday it was 60+ flags, today it's 90+. Hardly an accurate description of "dead and buried".

Thread = ! DOA

Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by ProudBird

 

Yesterday it was 60+ flags, today it's 90+. Hardly an accurate description of "dead and buried".

Thread = ! DOA

I am afraid that is a sad reflection on truther mentality rather than a reflection on the OP's waste of space video.