New Footage 9/11 Second Tower Explosion Incredibly Clear Video From Helicopter - Where Is The Plane?

WTF is with all the UFOs in this video!?!

Aliens monitoring this sh*t would be embarrassing. Now they know we're not ready for contact.

Edit: This video is edited. It is a fake. I believe 9/11 was an inside job, however, I cannot take the OP's video as truth.

Originally posted by sadwolf
reply to post by burntheships

 

More proof that the official 9/11 story was complete BS. Call me crazy but I just dont see the plane(s) that allegedly hit the towers or the pentagon.

scroll up a bit and watch the video that hasnt been edited like the OP video.

(At 2:25 into the video, the footage clearly shows an explosion in the second tower
and there is no plane. A huge explosion blasts out of the side creating a giant
fireball out of the second tower! I have watched several times, and there is no plane.)

Quoted from the OP...There is no plane granted but the video also suggests the buildings in NYC have no windows! I really believe this is just detail trashed by resolution...240p? Low resolution/jpeg compression is making many details disappear in this clip, if you look at higher res clips, the plane, though fuzzy, stays in the shot till the end IMO.

43 angles of the 2nd plane striking the WTC....

www.youtube.com...

Either the OP video is an edited fake, or these 43 are (which some were recorded from random people's backyards).

Unedited scene in the OP video is at 1:10...

This is faked. The object at 2:15 has a light square encircling it...clear evidence of CGI tampering to remove the plane.

More and more I believe 911 was not the US gov (entirely) or terrorists but possibly an operation from a "friendly" foreign government to instigate the US war machine to obliterate their enemies. Again, follow the money and Mr. Silverstein.

Originally posted by Human_Alien
reply to post by pshea38

 

Let's see if you're a person of character.
Please answer me this. And ONLY this.

Why?
Why fake planes at WTC?
Why not blame the 'missile' or 'bombs' or 'detonation' on bin Laden too? Why would WE cover-up something THEY supposedly did (lying about it of course)?

We already blamed him by noon that day so...I just don't understand the fakery part. Who benefits from that?
Please answer this. Thanks.

Can my speculations prove my character?

I am not sure if I understand your question exactly, but..

A real plane could not destroy those buildings in real life. It would barely have left a
scratch (relatively), with most of it crumpling against the facade and falling to the
ground, and certainly would have no chance whatsoever of causing a universal
collapse (a weaker upper section can never crush a much stronger lower section in a
gravity collapse). So images of a real plane crashing wouldn't and couldn't be convincing.

The buildings needed to be destroyed for various reasons.
They were emptied and demolished in a conventional manner (most probably) and
everything else is a contrived (vaguely credible) narrative, transformed into a hollywood
style production/presentation for public consumption.
Planes are the only plausible option (within the narrative) that could plausibly cause such
enormous damage so as to possibly explain the eventual (after 1 hour :lol collapse of
both buildings. The planes had to explode inside the building.

Fake cgi planes come to their own.
Osama bin laden is but the acting villain.
The collapse video is faked also, as are many other related 9/11 videos/photographs!

reply to post by Afterthought



Removed my off topic post...sorry

well i was in midtown manhattan when the second plane hit and we all (everyone on my floor) watched the second plane come in and hit the 2nd tower, so this video is a fake. how is this even up for debate?

You can clearly see the plane coming from the top right side of the screen.Come on people this garbage conspiracy is laugble nonsense.I like conspirccies and this website and reading about them but this stuff is ridiculous nonsense.

It also appears the 2nd plane was edited out partly because you can see it come from the upper right corner of the screen then it seems ot be edited and possibly removed or somehow the camera does not pick up the rest of the planes flight path into the 2nd WTC..This stuff is wreckless to even do with such a historic but terrible historic tragedy.

reply to post by speculativeoptimist


Ok Spec, thanks for weighing in...

I am with you on the comments from the gal reporter, her comments
are very strange.

*bts shakes head*

I just think it's wild how nonchalant that lady is. Calm is one thing, bitch is icy.

you can definitely tell this was edited, as other have said...upper right at 2:15

unless they have cloaking tech.

Originally posted by Blaine91555
reply to post by burntheships

 

A question?

You believe all those who saw the planes with their own eyes are lying?

You believe the angle of one video negates all other video's which clearly show the planes?

No I dont think those witnesses who saw a plane are lying.

I am thinking that this video is possibly edited, as some have said.

I am just not sure that it was just a plane that brought the towers down.

I am not a "no planer" but this video left me very confused, and I
was looking for answers.

Thanks for weighing in Blaine. I have been out all day at work,
just now logged back in and looking through the comments.

I had no idea this would gain much traction. Thanks again.

When will the conspiracies end regarding whether or not planes hit the building? I guess all of the other handfuls of videos clearly showing the second plane shall be discarded with because LOOK! HERE'S ONE WHERE THE ANGLE MAKES SEEING THE PLANE VERY DIFFICULT! (or edited out) I respect people who have opinions on conspiracies on a wide range of topics and I believe in many myself, but when it comes to whether or not a plane hit the building, anyone who believes there's a conspiracy belongs in a psych ward.

reply to post by Arken


Do you think the video is edited?
Your good at this stuff Arken, let me know ok?

ETA: I think that the video that shows the plane in looks
strange, it looks too small to be a commercial jet..

767...not.

reply to post by burntheships


At 2:41 min you can see a bright UFO leaving from the smoke at the top right part of building two...which streaks off toward the background.

Just thought I would throw that in there.

Originally posted by Jobeycool
You can clearly see the plane coming from the top right side of the screen.Come on people this garbage conspiracy is laugble nonsense.I like conspirccies and this website and reading about them but this stuff is ridiculous nonsense.

THANK YOU AND I AGREE....at 2:15 min you can see the plane for a couple seconds before it gets edited out.