It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /images/news/M/MammothSkiSilverDisc2004.jpg on this server.
Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Denied
Hi Zorgon, link to image dont work :
That is odd it works fine for me and they display in the post for me
Try the google short link
goo.gl...
Originally posted by crazyshady
Can anyone here actually prove something is fake rather than just typing about why they think it is fake?
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Denied
Hi Zorgon, link to image dont work :
That is odd it works fine for me and they display in the post for me
Try the google short link
goo.gl...
Originally posted by Aarcadius
could be a Frisbee or something similar thrown off shot and they didnt notice...
and YES i have seen frisbee's that even i thought were too ufo looking.
anyway a little off topic but not really.
i have a question to put to ATS in zorgons thread =\ i'm sorry but perfect spot.
lets say that there are many alternate dimensions right. and these aliens mastered the ability to move from one dimension to another... keep up with me here ok?
What if these fake looking UFOs are not fake at all? we haven't mastered multi dimensions... how do we know what a craft that can travel at the speed of light, jump from planet to planet maybe even travel through dimensions looks like? maybe it looks fake because we don't understand multi dimensions well enough to accept that strange and out of place things aren't always fake but in the wrong dimension?
wow ok that was harder to explain then i thought i hope you guys get what im trying to say.
thanks OP for sharing.
three photos (one photo and two enlargements) of an unidentified (flying?) object. These were taken recently in Mammoth, CA, by Mr. Ron Reznick, a computer tech and professional photographer. To date the object has not been identified. As certain questions as to the authenticity of the photo(s) is sure to come into question, I am including a statement from Ron that he emailed to me as well as the web address where he displays his various photos. Unlike me, he has no particular interest in UFO's and such. So, while I'm happy that he got the picture...I'm also just a little bit jealous!
Ron's letter in response to questions regarding the possibility of defects or hoax:
The camera is a Nikon D1... a very professional $5000 digital SLR. The lens is a new Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D AF-S EDIF in perfect condition. This is without doubt one of the world's finest wide-angle lenses and is a very expensive lens (I paid $1500 for it a few days before the trip) -- it is most certainly the best wide angle zoom lens available, and I have tested it against a 24mm f/2.8D Nikkor, which is also recognized as one of the few very exceptional wide angle prime lenses.
The quality is nearly as good as the prime. There are most certainly no defects in either the camera or the lens. The original image was shot RAW (.nef format). The unique characteristic of this format is that it is a 12-bit raw data dump from the CCD, and is only capable of being written by the D1's CCD (charge-coupled device) imager -- it cannot be written or edited by external software. The RAW format is accepted as evidence by courts, whereas any other format can be altered.
Originally posted by TrueInstinct
Had a look at the image on PS. I'd say it was shopped, but the light does match the angle of the shadows of the trees, and if the object was moving (being a UFO I'll assume it was), then the blur would roughly match up for a 1/100th-1/400th second shutter speed.
But it could have easily been photoshoped into the image within minutes.
Added another UFO to it, wasn't the most suitable image, but gives people an idea of how easy it could have been done in longer than 5 minutes.
edit on 12-3-2012 by TrueInstinct because: (no reason given)