It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Annee
I have a problem with religion mixed with a business/corporation.
It is illegal for them to hire only Catholics. Why is it legal for them to force their belief on employees that are not Catholic.
The 2 laws don't compute.
As I said - - - someone with a weakness for religion allowed something that shouldn't be.
Originally posted by DrChuck
Why? What is wrong with a business with a religious foundation? The Catholic Church is a religious institution that just happens to have branched into businesses. It is first and foremost a religious entity.
Originally posted by Annee
Obviously you are a God believer and I am not.
And the Mafia became legitimate business too. Pretty lame argument.
God is a choice. God needs to stay where he is chosen.
Originally posted by DrChuck
Originally posted by Annee
Obviously you are a God believer and I am not.
This has nothing to do with my belief in a God, I consider the Catholic Church a bane to mankind since its inception. It has probably brought more deaths and misery to more men than any other entity in history. But to preserve my rights as a human in this country, the Churches rights must be equally preserved.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by DrChuck
Originally posted by Annee
Obviously you are a God believer and I am not.
This has nothing to do with my belief in a God, I consider the Catholic Church a bane to mankind since its inception. It has probably brought more deaths and misery to more men than any other entity in history. But to preserve my rights as a human in this country, the Churches rights must be equally preserved.
Yeah Right!
Not buying it.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by something wicked
Annee, why do you assume that 'Religion' = Catholic only? Do you not think other faiths whether Christian based or not have no right of opinion on contemporay issues?
I don't. Most of my posts refer to Religion/Religious - - or God believers.
This subject specifies Catholic - - which is why in some sentences I specify Catholic.
I was raised Christian - - I have the right to have an opinion on Christianity.
I do not comment about Islam (other then grouped in religion/religious) because I have no knowledge of it. Many Christians slam Islam - - do you think that is OK?
Originally posted by Monger
The Catholic church is a sick joke. I was christened Catholic, and around age 6 our parish priest came to the door to have a one-on-one chat what my father.
A little background information - my father was molested by a priest as a child. A lot of Catholic apologists will tell you that these things happen very rarely. That's simply not the case, it happens more often than anybody cares to remember. Thats why the bishops and the various popes over the years have gone to such lengths to cover the issue up.
Anyhow, this priest asked my father if he could have some (as my father put it) 'special alone time' with my brother and I to discuss Catholisicm. My father gave the priest an empathic 'No,' but the priest insisted. So my father did what anybody else who has suffered abuse at the hands of the Catholic church would have done - he gave the priest a black eye for his effort and kicked him out of the house.
We never went to a Catholic church again.
Just a couple of years ago this priest was arrested at an airport, off a return flight from Rome with a laptop full of images of naked children.
Turns out, he had been caught out molesting children in the past, the Vatican payed hush money to the families involved and simply moved the priest. I think he's currently standing trial for the child porn.
The Vatican did everything in its power to PROTECT and HIDE this child molestor.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by IronArm
. . . moral standards.
I refuse to use or acknowledge the word moral. Ever since Bush took office its become the most over used and abused word in the English language.
Plus - - Christians seem to think they own it - - - and no one can have morals unless you are a Jesus believer.
Some animal societies behave ethically better then some Christians.
You do not need some invisible being outside yourself to live/believe/behave Ethically. And who's business is it to dictate "moral" to me? I'm very capable of choosing what I consider Ethical.
Originally posted by IronArm
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by IronArm
. . . moral standards.
I refuse to use or acknowledge the word moral. Ever since Bush took office its become the most over used and abused word in the English language.
Plus - - Christians seem to think they own it - - - and no one can have morals unless you are a Jesus believer.
Some animal societies behave ethically better then some Christians.
You do not need some invisible being outside yourself to live/believe/behave Ethically. And who's business is it to dictate "moral" to me? I'm very capable of choosing what I consider Ethical.
Correct me if I'm wrong...but I'm quite sure that Christians aren't the only people who use the word "moral".
And nowhere did I say that acting morally dictates a need for Christianity. I know a handfull of people who lead amazingly upright lives without the desire for God. Morality is a verb, not an deistic/theistic ideology.
As for the comments about animal societies...thats quite insulting. It may be true, as I stated prior, people are people despite having a God. Insulting none-the-less. Your capability in choosing what is Ethical isn't personal. Ethics are defined as socialy acceptable actions for the benifit of the civilization right?
dictionary.reference.com...
(I still have no idea how to hot-link)
Originally posted by IronArm
Annee and her slander against the Christian Body.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by IronArm
Annee and her slander against the Christian Body.
I was raised Christian - - I have the right to have any opinion I want - - since I am full knowledge of what being Christian is.
I don't slam Islam. Why? Because I don't have knowledge of it or every experienced. However - - lots of Christians on this site slam Islam all the time.
Why don't you go have a talk with them?
Originally posted by IronArm
You seem to meandering from the point of this post. If you were born into a Taoist family they would probably not appreciate being backhanded either. There is no "right" to insult someone because you "know it".
Originally posted by IronArm
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by IronArm
. . . moral standards.
I refuse to use or acknowledge the word moral. Ever since Bush took office its become the most over used and abused word in the English language.
Plus - - Christians seem to think they own it - - - and no one can have morals unless you are a Jesus believer.
Some animal societies behave ethically better then some Christians.
You do not need some invisible being outside yourself to live/believe/behave Ethically. And who's business is it to dictate "moral" to me? I'm very capable of choosing what I consider Ethical.
Correct me if I'm wrong...but I'm quite sure that Christians aren't the only people who use the word "moral".
And nowhere did I say that acting morally dictates a need for Christianity.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by IronArm
You seem to meandering from the point of this post. If you were born into a Taoist family they would probably not appreciate being backhanded either. There is no "right" to insult someone because you "know it".
Please post exactly which backhanded comment you are referring to that I made.
In my experience Christians have a severe persecution complex - - - and get riled if you simply don't agree with them.
It took me a 60 year journey actually looking for God - - resulting in not believing in any god.
Oh - and the "poor little Christians" - - maybe they could find it in their heart to be a bit kinder to Atheists. They just have a bit of trouble understanding it goes both ways.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by seabag
I think that there should be a public option for healthcare (which would include contraception) for all in America and it could be afforded for a fraction of the cost of the wars/over sea presence.
So we end those and we can have it and it wont hurt anyone.
A public option would give people that can't afford insurance healthcare, but it would also allow people that can afford it to see whatever care they want and let them buy the best if they are afraid public healthcare = inferior healthcare.
Everyone would win. We should be taking care of people here at home. I pay taxes, but I can't afford health insurance, there are millions like me and we deserve it.
Also.. I would love to know what contraception and "the pill" have to do with abortion?edit on 11-3-2012 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OhZone
"Worldwide overpopulation is the greatest risk to public health that we have ever encountered. The single obstacle to solving this problem is not money or the lack of acceptable family planning choices, but the opposition by a small group of extreme reactionaries now in control of the Roman Catholic Church. Uncounted numbers of people are denied access to contraception and abortion by the political machinations of a pope who is, by the dogma of his religion, unable to change his mind."
www.population-security.org...
"The National Catholic Reporter, a major national Catholic weekly newspaper, published a most revealing report in its December 29, 1989 issue. Doug Wead, special assistant to President Bush, was interviewed and quoted as saying: "He [President Bush] has been more sensitive and more accessible to the needs of the Catholic Church than any president I know of in American history." Wead indicated he felt that Bush's relationship with the American Catholic leadership was much closer than Reagan's had been: "We want the Church to feel loved and wanted, and we want them to have input." This relationship was maintained through five U.S. cardinals: Bernard Law, Joseph Bernardin, Edmund Szoka, John O'Connor, and James Hickey."
www.population-security.org...
This whole page discusses the Influence of the Vatican on US politics.
As is this one:
Why is the Vatican a threat to Americans?
www.population-security.org...