It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bluesma
Originally posted by PageAlaCearl
If a bigger one came by, X6.9 on August 9, 2011, and nothing happened, why so much hype about this one?
and a X6.5 on December 6, 2006 and an X9.0 on December 5, 2006, and were still here.edit on 7-3-2012 by PageAlaCearl because: (no reason given)
See, when the flares are not facing earth (like those other ones) it doesn't effect us.
When they are facing earth , they effect us.
Originally posted by DrNotforhire
That last model here iswa.gsfc.nasa.gov...
shows everything is going to be alright
Originally posted by Bluesma
Originally posted by PageAlaCearl
If a bigger one came by, X6.9 on August 9, 2011, and nothing happened, why so much hype about this one?
and a X6.5 on December 6, 2006 and an X9.0 on December 5, 2006, and were still here.edit on 7-3-2012 by PageAlaCearl because: (no reason given)
See, when the flares are not facing earth (like those other ones) it doesn't effect us.
When they are facing earth , they effect us.
On August 9, 2011 at 3:48 a.m. EDT, the sun emitted an Earth-directed X6.9 flare, as measured by the NOAA GOES satellite.
Originally posted by PageAlaCearl
If a bigger one came by, X6.9 on August 9, 2011, and nothing happened, why so much hype about this one?
and a X6.5 on December 6, 2006 and an X9.0 on December 5, 2006, and were still here.edit on 7-3-2012 by PageAlaCearl because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Bluesma
Originally posted by DrNotforhire
That last model here iswa.gsfc.nasa.gov...
shows everything is going to be alright
Uh.... did you look at that model?? Do you realize that the little yellow circle is earth???
Originally posted by Damrod
I'm not convinced that this is going to be a direct hit as the written reports I am reading still say "near direct hit or glancing blow". The models are cute and clever, but you are talking about reducing millions and millions of miles into a couple of inches on a screen. What looks close might be 2 million miles away. I'll take what the experts have taken the time to write over my amateur interpretation of some scaled down models.
And it is not over,yet.
Originally posted by s0l4rn1ghtm4r3
The magnetosphere is going ape-#.
www2.nict.go.jp...
Originally posted by DrNotforhire
it'll be fine, your internet will be here tomorrow and I'll be here with an "I told you so"
Originally posted by Ghost375
Originally posted by Damrod
I'm not convinced that this is going to be a direct hit as the written reports I am reading still say "near direct hit or glancing blow". The models are cute and clever, but you are talking about reducing millions and millions of miles into a couple of inches on a screen. What looks close might be 2 million miles away. I'll take what the experts have taken the time to write over my amateur interpretation of some scaled down models.
How are you not going to post any links with that post? You're going to take the experts word over this? The experts are saying it will hit us this time. "near direct hit" still means its going to hit us...don't pull out the 2 million miles thing when it will hit us.
and then the part about the government study of the effects of flares? what did it say? why no link?
The region continues to rotate across the front of the sun, so the March 6 flare was more Earthward facing than the previous ones. It triggered a temporary radio blackout on the sunlit side of Earth that interfered with radio navigation and short wave radio.
The sun erupted with one of the largest solar flares of this solar cycle on March 6, 2012 at 7PM EST. This flare was categorized as an X5.4, making it the second largest flare -- after an X6.9 on August 9, 2011
. A moderate storm usually causes aurora and may interfere with high frequency radio transmission near the poles
Besides the August 2011 X-class flare, the last time the sun sent out flares of this magnitude was in 2006. There was an X6.5 on December 6, 2006 and an X9.0 on December 5, 2006. Like the most recent events, those two flares erupted from the same region on the sun, which is a common occurrence.
the flares will likely have a weak effect on Earth's magnetosphere.
The sun unleashed two extremely powerful flares Tuesday. NASA tentatively says that particles from the solar storms are probably heading in Earth's direction, but will likely deliver a glancing blow at most.
Originally posted by PageAlaCearl
If a bigger one came by, X6.9 on August 9, 2011, and nothing happened, why so much hype about this one?
and a X6.5 on December 6, 2006 and an X9.0 on December 5, 2006, and were still here.edit on 7-3-2012 by PageAlaCearl because: (no reason given)
A SEP event is underway. We have become magnetically conected to Sunspot Region 1429. At the time of this original post the 10MeV Integral Flux has exceeded 100pfu. NOAA Scale: S2 - Moderate Potential Impacts: Radiation - Passengers and crew in high latitude, high altitude flights may experience small, increased radiation exposures. Spacecraft - Infrequent single-event upsets to satellites are possible. Radio - Small effects on polar HF (high frequency) propagation resulting in fades at lower frequencies.. Additional flaring from region 1429 will rapidly increase this proton flux. When our "foot point" location, the area that we are magnetically conected to the Sun at becomes located at or very near an active region the connection allows Solar Energetic Particles such as protons and electrons to travel an extremely fast and direct path to Earth during a Solar Flare from that region. These Solar Energetic Particles travel at approximately 80% the speed of light and start bombarding the Ionosphere, within a few hours of a Solar Flare. Additionally, during these events, CME driven shocks contribute to accelerating these particles. This Event was precipitated by the X 5.4 flare released early March 7, 2012 at 00:40 UT from Sunspot Region 1429.
"It's hitting us right in the nose," said Joe Kunches, a scientist for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. He called it the sun's version of "Super Tuesday."
Originally posted by Damrod
Well I tried to find the Gov article that I mentioned but could not.
The front ten pages of google are just Bullsh*t blogs and looney tunes talking doomsday about something they don't have a clue about.
In a nutshell, the gov study says that the worse things that can happen in a minimum to mid x-flare scenario is nuisance issues...dropped calls, missing tv channels, static on the radio, gps malfunction...etc...etc...etc.
To give scale to this, the Carrington Event of 1859 (I think, don't hold me to that) was an X-45. This is like comparing a firecracker to a stick of dynamite...get the picture?