Turner Construction WTC tennant & very successful company.

Originally posted by jazz10
reply to post by Seconal

 

No, i said no more threads from me, thats what i meant.

Be clearer next time, you've dashed thousands of hopes.

reply to post by Seconal


Are you seeing yet?

Still ye do not see.

reply to post by jazz10

Just noticed that Turner construction is listed as the company building the Google Barge in San Francisco bay. Not sure if it is worth further investigation, but the name raises eyebrows.

gcaptain.com...

AX
FTNWO

Is there a point to all this?

This is not evidence it's speculation, editorialized facts twisted to fill a preconceived notion.

I think multiple conspircies, JFK, RFK, 9/11 and many other events can be connected by 3 generations of Bush

Your an expert on conspiracies but you can't spell it.

That says it all.

reply to post by spooky24


The point is to prove that people could easily have been in the towers planting explosives and it wouldn't be that hard to cover up since the company was already in bush's pocket...
It provides a very plausible way for large amounts of explosives to be placed systematically through out the building.
Its not that crazy of a idea to begin with, I am willing to bet that the WTC towers had construction/renovation almost every day between the two towers.. They were old buildings, I am sure they needed constant upkeep.
Then you add a massive company with pretty good ties to bush, you know jeb being involved in the company and all, that just so happened to work to the building leading up to the morning of the attacks AND the almost EXACT floors that were hit by the planes.... Oh and what was that renovation that was being done, fireproofing.

Just to flip the script, can you prove they didn't use explosives? I know I won't get an answer on that but that's ok
Since there is more signs to fact that they were present, squibs, the cloud ejection, firefighters eyewitness. Those type of things point more to idea of expositions.
I guess a better questions is, What should have been there, or been seen, to prove explosions were present that wasn't seen or heard?

reply to post by AlphaExray


Well apparently they worked on the floors of WTC prior and also have had a part in the building/construction in the middle east. So yeah I totally agree.

911 solved with names and connections.

Must watch!

No offense jazz just wanted to shed light on this thread that is similar to yours that you started.
This is another one about the TCC that got a lot of traffic. See if there isn't anything in this post that you found and maybe you can add your info to the existing convo
This is key info IMO so the more post about it the better, OSers always want to say it would be impossible to get the demo work done but this kinda throws a wrench in that thinking.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by Sremmos80


Nice thread you have there
Seems like everything is coming to light.

reply to post by jazz10

apparently they worked on the floors of WTC prior

they are not the only ones involved......The Komatsu-Dresser mining division operated from 1988 to 1997, in July 1996, they patented a thermite demolition device.

here is more from the A S website...

AlienScientist

reply to post by spooky24

This is not evidence it's speculation, editorialized facts twisted to fill a preconceived notion.

EVIDENCE is the 105 vertical feet of global unified acceleration EQUAL to g. occurs in WTC7 found by 2005 NIST from 1.75 seconds to 4.0 seconds which the mass WE SEE accelerating plays NO PART in making the path it falls into..

SPECULATION is the FIRE we can't see that is CLAIMED/pushed by 2008 NIST to cause it...


NCSTAR1A-3.2]"It is likely that much of the burning took place beyond the views of the windows"

This whole thread reads like a series of random thoughts.
I see no proof of anything.

Have you noticed the entire 911 section seems to be shriveling ?

reply to post by samkent


Lol hardly, more and more people are turning to the fact that the commission and nist reports are bogus.
This thread is not speculation, Turner construction company took part in renovations pre attack, clean up post attack and then had a blast over seas following...
Where is the speculation and random thoughts...?

Sremmos80
reply to post by samkent

 

Lol hardly, more and more people are turning to the fact that the commission and nist reports are bogus.
This thread is not speculation, Turner construction company took part in renovations pre attack, clean up post attack and then had a blast over seas following...
Where is the speculation and random thoughts...?

Exactly.
oh and where's the gold?

reply to post by samkent

This whole thread reads like a series of random thoughts. I see no proof of anything.

then I suggest schooling on science and READING the 2005 NIST scientific report that DID NOT find any reason WHY these collapses proceeded.

hgfbob
reply to post by samkent

 

This whole thread reads like a series of random thoughts. I see no proof of anything.

then I suggest schooling on science and READING the 2005 NIST scientific report that DID NOT find any reason WHY these collapses proceeded.

That about sums it up lol

One of the missing links to 911

When are ATS going to contribute using what they think rather than what they are told to believe.?

Tic toc tic toc.......

a reply to: jazz10



.....amazing how they all shut up and jump ship huh!

just because of 'words written'......pretty much how the Gov. is going to respond to the masses when we finally get together on this, 'cept they will try to enforce their claims NOT with supporting evidence but with guns....for they all have the same supporting evidence behind their claims....NONE!

as you know, this is all about agenda......9-11 truth is not dead, it is festering in the souls of every American, just waiting for that first shot fired.....these are the first shots.....now it's time to alert the masses....