It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mikeyy
I don't ever see the Electric Car going anywhere. Electricity is not cheap, and it just would'nt save you any money in the long run.
And for $50k? What a joke.
Does'nt effect me me though, I like V8's, I don't care what the Gas prices become, i'll still fuel up this 350 Small block.
But as part of the bailout the government forced GM to build a long way from ready for production volt. GM want to wait this they had a lot longer range battery and had lower the weight and improved the electric motors to give higher HP with less amp draw from the battery.
The government wanted to get the volt into production because they want the Japanese car makers too start building electric cars.for the US market.
This is the problem you get when you have tree huggers in government.
tree huggers only understand things that people dream up as possible in the future and try to force then to happen long before the idea is ready. tree huggers are not engineers nor do most even understand how thing work.
This plus the fact that GM equips their cars with On Star makes me wonder if they aren't a government "asset."
Originally posted by TDawgRex
reply to post by resist2012
Have you noticed that everything that Obama touches on the industrial side goes bankrupt?
Some one please tell me he's not doing this on purpose?
Originally posted by kawika
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
"Five years from now, when I'm not president any more, I'll buy one and drive it myself," Obama vowed.
I worked on a little tiny sensor in the seat in the volt.
Because of this the company that laid me off (way back in 2009) will no longer sell that part to GM (less income).
And, hopefully he can buy a used car, in one year not fiveedit on 2-3-2012 by kawika because: add quoteedit on 2-3-2012 by kawika because: added year of layoff
Originally posted by drock905
The Volt simply wasn't a very good car and it was 20,000 dollars too expensive, especially when there are cheaper better alternatives out there. GM fumbled everything about this car from the marketing, roll-out, price, specs, design. Its very typical of GM the last 20 years they didn't really understand what consumers wanted and the result is another flop.
This should have been marketed as a halo car for GM instead of a car to challenge the already entrenched toyota prius. To get the general public really turned on by hybrid cars they are going to have to be sexy and desirable not generic econoboxes Why would i go to a volt when a diesel jetta will get me better economy for a much lower initial cost, especially considering this economy.
this would have sold at the msrp
not this
Originally posted by TDawgRex
reply to post by resist2012
Have you noticed that everything that Obama touches on the industrial side goes bankrupt?
Some one please tell me he's not doing this on purpose?
Originally posted by swimmer15
I love how GM owns up to their mistake (the Volt) and blames the media for their failure. The Volt was plagued with problems, it was grossly overpriced and in reality it wasn't much better (gas mileage wise) than conventional subcompact cars.
Here's how the Volt stacked up to Chevy's own Cruz Eco:
www.caranddriver.com...
Originally posted by beezzer
There once was a man named Obama
Who came on the scene with a jolt
He took all our riches
Made us all gov'ment bitches
And drove off in a used Chevy Volt.