Obama Rebukes Limbaugh, Thanks woman called a "slut" and "prostitute"

reply to post by pfwag


You're stereotypes are soooooo far from the real opinions of the parties you mentioned, I have to wonder where you get your "news" from

Click here for more information.

Originally posted by modified device
Breitbart and.now Limbaugh,looks like Obamas team is taking out some of the rights artillery pieces and everyone is cheering it.sheep.

edit on 4-3-2012 by modified device because: because mu kindle.is a beast to type.with

They're being taken out because of public pressure. Those advertisers realize how much the general public opposes those clowns, so why would they associate their products/services with those crooks?

For crying out loud, are you seriously saying this is Obama taking them out? You have to be joking! Rush for example had a flower company advertising with him, and who do you think their main clients are? WOMEN!!

If the guy you advertise with calls your target customers "sluts" for using contraception (which the majority of them use), do you think it's good business for that flower company to advertise with him?

You lot are funny pretending this anti-Rush sentiment is somehow wrong

NO ONE is Denying women BC the catholic christian church who does NOT believe in BC just does NOT want to provide it and or pay for it its about religious freedom. You guys seem to be for that when it comes to muslims.

Originally posted by RealSpoke
Why would anyone want to deny women birth control?

It never ceases to amaze me when the "pill junkie", multimillion dollar a year making Limbaugh, can cause such a ruckus by intentionally pushing buttons. He does this type of thing over and over again yet we are mortified every time. Wouldn't it be nice if he were ignored and marginalized? Maybe then his popularity would wane. We can only hope!

reply to post by MrXYZ

If the guy you advertise with calls your target customers "sluts" for using contraception (which the majority of them use), do you think it's good business for that flower company to advertise with him?

Rush didn't call the woman a slut 'for using contraceptives'.

Everyone uses birth control. Even sluts & prostitutes.
He should have called them responsible sluts & prostitutes at the very least.
Or librarians & waitresses. Or Teachers & CEO's

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MrXYZ

 

If the guy you advertise with calls your target customers "sluts" for using contraception (which the majority of them use), do you think it's good business for that flower company to advertise with him?

Rush didn't call the woman a slut 'for using contraceptives'.

No...but he inferred that using contraception somehow equals "a lot of sex"...which in his eyes means she's a slut. Hilarious if you consider that clown was caught with tons of Viagra heading to the Dominican Republic for a nice sex vacation

Originally posted by MrXYZ

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MrXYZ

 

If the guy you advertise with calls your target customers "sluts" for using contraception (which the majority of them use), do you think it's good business for that flower company to advertise with him?

Rush didn't call the woman a slut 'for using contraceptives'.

No...but he inferred that using contraception somehow equals "a lot of sex"...which in his eyes means she's a slut. Hilarious if you consider that clown was caught with tons of Viagra heading to the Dominican Republic for a nice sex vacation

Then why did you state that Rush called people "sluts for using contraceptives"? He didn't say that, and you just agreed.

reply to post by NOTurTypical


Because he clearly implied that people using contraception do so because they have a lot of sex...which according to him makes them sluts. There's no difference between saying "people using contraceptives are sluts" and "people using contraception have a lot of sex and are therefore sluts"

Are you seriously defending that clown?

Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by NOTurTypical

 

Because he clearly implied that people using contraception do so because they have a lot of sex...which according to him makes them sluts. There's no difference between saying "people using contraceptives are sluts" and "people using contraception have a lot of sex and are therefore sluts"

Are you seriously defending that clown?

Rush didn't say that people using contraceptives are sluts. And you agreed above that he didn't say that.

reply to post by MrXYZ


Of course he is because the let's stone the homosexuals, put the women back in the kitchen, and bomb the brownman for his resources because my ancient text says it is ok to do so crowd loves Rush. Why? Because what he said is what they really feel. They have the good sense to never reveal it publicly to their neighbors themselves so they need his voice to express it.

Originally posted by NOTurTypical

Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by NOTurTypical

 

Because he clearly implied that people using contraception do so because they have a lot of sex...which according to him makes them sluts. There's no difference between saying "people using contraceptives are sluts" and "people using contraception have a lot of sex and are therefore sluts"

Are you seriously defending that clown?

Rush didn't say that people using contraceptives are sluts. And you agreed above that he didn't say that.

No...he just said that because she uses contraception she has a lot of sex...which makes her a slut.

Massive difference, right?

Please tell me you're joking

Not that it matters, turns out Rush lost a massive amount of power because of his clownish behaviour. His ratings were already dropping before this incident, they're slowly nearing rock bottom now. Only a small fundamentalist extreme group of people still follow him, and those fools are a tiny minority

reply to post by MrXYZ


I could be wrong, but I thought Rush was flabbergasted at her saying she spends 3K per year on birth control. So to me, the issue wasn't birth control itself, it was $3,000 worth of birth control.

Only a small fundamentalist extreme group of people still follow him, and those fools are a tiny minority.

Really? I thought Rush was the most listened to personality on talk radio after Howard Stern. Times have changed apparently?

reply to post by NOTurTypical


Yup, times change. In fact, his claimed ratings were never correct as up until last year radio shows couldn't even determine exact number of listeners. His ratings dropped by over 35% last year alone

He's an extremist representing a small minority who don't value facts.

reply to post by MrXYZ

In fact, his claimed ratings were never correct

Do you even know how ratings work? Personalities/Shows don't submit their own ratings numbers.

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MrXYZ

 

In fact, his claimed ratings were never correct

Do you even know how ratings work? Personalities/Shows don't submit their own ratings numbers.

TV and radio number of viewer counts don't work the same way. In the past there was no accurate way of determining accurate radio viewership numbers...now there is. In short, the amount of people listening to that clown is pretty damn small, and dropping like a stone even before this incident

Not surprising given what a hypocrite and clown that guy is

Originally posted by MrXYZ

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MrXYZ

 

In fact, his claimed ratings were never correct

Do you even know how ratings work? Personalities/Shows don't submit their own ratings numbers.

TV and radio number of viewer counts don't work the same way. In the past there was no accurate way of determining accurate radio viewership numbers...now there is. In short, the amount of people listening to that clown is pretty damn small, and dropping like a stone even before this incident

Not surprising given what a hypocrite and clown that guy is

No, radio and TV calculate their views or listeners in the same manner. there is just a different company doing the work. Nielson for TV and Arbitron for radio. Nielson tried radio, but gave that up a few years back. So, you're incorrect, ratings are determined by a 3rd party.

reply to post by NOTurTypical


True...but technically there's massive differences...which explains why radio ratings were NEVER accurate until last year

Doesn't matter if it's the same 3rd party or not...

Same ads running on Rush Limbaugh are running on shows like Howard Stern.
If I were rush I wouldn't want there business anyways. It seems to me, Half them companies ads are selling a product that seems be a bit suspect.
I would not have apologized, Instead I would have done what the Masters Golf tournament did a few years back when the feminazi( Martha Burk ) tried to put the squeeze on them. They said How about this.. we Don't need national advertising to make money. Poof that was the last we herd from her group.... 8 years later Masters Golf tournament is still Swinging. CBS has carried the Masters since 1956

how do you label, A predominantly promiscuous woman or man?