Breitbart Confidant: Tapes Of Obama Will Be Released Soon

reply to post by Frankenchrist


If it;s just mariuana no biggie..He had admitted in his book that he experimented with coc aine and Pot..I actually applaud him on this, I had hopes of federal legalization in his presidency.

I heard a rumor that the videos are of Obama praying.....to Allah. But it is what it is, a rumor.

ALS

Originally posted by ALOSTSOUL
I heard a rumor that the videos are of Obama praying.....to Allah. But it is what it is, a rumor.

ALS

Then he will get the Muslim American vote...


But praying? Thats not bad. not bad at all, even if it is to Allah.

It has to be worse than that.

Breitbart's death is suspicious just because hes Breitbart.
it would have been even more suspicious if he had died of old age.

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
...haven't just jumped the shark, they strapped on a jet pack and rocketed over Cthulu.

best quote ever.

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher

Originally posted by beezzer

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer

And I can't wait to see Obama-haters epic dissapointment...and then trying to make something out of nothing.
The delayed release of the tape = Hype.
Hype = trying to make something out of nothing.

edit on 2-3-2012 by OutKast Searcher because: (no reason given)

Personally, I think the delayed release of the tapes has to do with this internet shutdown on March 8th that is supposed to happen, bet when it comes back up lots of stuff will mysteriously "disappear from the web.",

Originally posted by AMajor7
First of all, who in their right mind is going to give a warning that they plan to divulge potentially damaging information on the President of the United States? Are you kidding me? Not very Breit-bart. Sorry, but he made his bed,

Isn't it odd.... people like Jerome Corsi, Joe Arpaio, and Breitbart are actually stupid enough to give a warning? Where is the benefit in that? That would be like somebody telling a store owner that they are going to rob their business on a certain day. Why not keep their mouth shut until the day they are going to release the information?

Now the people who are in possession of Breitbarts video are doing the same damn thing....giving everybody a heads up that they plan on releasing it on a certain day. What's wrong with today? Why give those who might be damaged an opportunity to stop it? This is a game. Total frickn joke and a half.

on contrare! I think people who have daming evidence like this are actually SAYING it ahead of time these days in order to PROTECT their life. Meaning, if I get it out to the public, they wouldnt dare kill me because of how it would look. However, TPTB are getting very brazen these days and what we really should be concerned about is the fact that TPTB ARE getting that brazen, like they just dont have to do this stuff in secret anymore?

www.hollywoodreporter.com...

He was talking politics in the bar before he died too idk this seems kind of fishy.

Originally posted by Afterthought
LOL! Yeah, Big O picking his nose. Sure. That's what on the video(s)!

Folks need to brush up on his buddy Bill Ayers like burntheships stated. During Ayers' days of promoting violent protests, one of his mantras was "Kill your parents". Nice guy.

Here's a couple of websites to check out:
www.discoverthenetworks.org...
voices.washingtonpost.com...

edit on 2-3-2012 by Afterthought because: (no reason given)

"violence - rough or injurious physical force, action, or treatment: to die by violence."

if, by violence, you are referring to this definition (which i believe you are), then Ayers and the Weather Underground never partook in violence. they methodologically picked symbolic targets while carefully and tactfully assuring no one would be injured in their bombings. each of their bombings was in response to actual violence occurring in Vietnam as well as domestically at the hands of the police against activists here in the U.S. as a result of their caution, no one was ever injured in a Weather Underground bombings. whether their tactics were the proper tactics i will not ponder here, but suffice it to say, his ideology and acts were consistently non-violent, and based on this definition of terrorism, which necessitates violence, Ayers never actually partook in terrorism. as for attributing the belief in killing one's parents to Mr. Ayers, that is simply a flat out lie. it's sad Republicans are resorting to beating this dead horse issue which was already used ad nauseum by the McCain/Palin campaign in 2008. why don't you do yourself a favor and learn something about Ayers/the Weather Underground yourself:



www.democracynow.org...

The outcome of what the video really doesnt matter though in my opinion. Obama has already been the worst presedent on record. He has destroyed our constitution. If I have to explain why your too old and invested in the system to the point where it would be too painfull for you to realize what was in front of you so ill stop now. If you think Obama is a good president than watch some espn, turn off you brain, and listen to cnn.

reply to post by eboyd


Non viloent you say? I give you the weather underground

Their goal was to create a clandestine revolutionary party for the violent overthrow of the US government.[3]

The "Days of Rage", their first public demonstration on October 8, 1969, was a riot in Chicago timed to coincide with the trial of the Chicago Seven.The group planned the October 8–11 event as a "National Action" built around John Jacobs' slogan, "bring the war home."[1] The National Action grew out of a resolution drafted by Jacobs and introduced at the October 1968 SDS National Council meeting in Boulder, Colorado. The resolution, titled "The Elections Don't Mean #—Vote Where the Power Is—Our Power Is In The Street" and adopted by the council, was prompted by the success of the Democratic National Convention protests in August 1968 and reflected Jacobs' strong advocacy of direct action as a political strategy.

The direct actions included vandalism against homes, businesses and automobiles, and assault against police officers. Dozens were injured, and over 280 members of the Weather Underground were arrested.

You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows was the title of a position paper they distributed at an SDS convention in Chicago on June 18, 1969. This founding document called for a "white fighting force" to be allied with the "Black Liberation Movement" and other radical movements[5] to achieve "the destruction of US imperialism and achieve a classless world: world communism."[6]

en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by burntheships


Sinclair News ?

Ha Ha Ha.

Larry Sinclair ?

ROFLMAO.

And you honestly fell for it ?

Originally posted by Destinyone
Part of me wonders, what legal dancing will happen over the release of these tapes. Since Obama has secured, through the courts, all his past college records, will he attempt to shove these tapes under that same umbrella of legal secrecy.

This will be very interesting...

That's one potential approach to quash them. I believe they should release them via several avenues, all at the same time, and make sure at least 2 or 3 releases are on torrent - with copies for download on several computers in several different countries.

Get those babies a wide=based head start out in the wilds of the internet, and they'll be out there forever.

Originally posted by newcovenant

Originally posted by PrimePorkchop
reply to post by Blackmarketeer

 

He did everything in his power to kill health care reform in this country and then drops dead of a heart attack at 43.

The two have absolutely nothing in common with each other. This is quite possibly the worst thought out attempt at discrediting someone i've ever read.

The last thing this country needs is government saying "do this and do that" like in your precious Obamacare.

edit on 2-3-2012 by PrimePorkchop because: (no reason given)

It isn't saying do this and do that.

Of course it is. the individual mandate is ALL about taking your choice away and eliminating your options to live as you see fit and buy what YOU choose to buy or not buy. It's the State telling you how to live and what to buy.

Breitfart announced he had the tapes at the CPAC meeting weeks ago but they still have not been released. How long does it take to edit them?

Originally posted by oghamxx
Breitfart announced he had the tapes at the CPAC meeting weeks ago but they still have not been released. How long does it take to edit them?

Another way that you could put it:

He just died, how long does it take for the executors to settle his estate?

Who knows for certain what all is involved with a situation such as this? It isn't exactly typical.

i read these threads regarding mr Breitbart , and despair - so few people seem to have any grasp of the facts , or even care - all they wish to do is spin the tail to fit thier personal ideology

the facts of the matter are :

feb 10 2012 - mr Breitbart , claims to have access to one or more peices of film / video footage from obamas ` college days ` and further that he will ensure obama is ` properly vetted this election `

1st march , Breitbart dies

after his death , his " confidant " makes an " amazing " post diction claiming that Breitbart told him to ` see what happens march 1st `

now with zero evidence - people have leaped to the " fact " that Breitbart planned to release the tapes / films on march 1st

now the big question - IF Breitbart did actually plan to release the material he alledgedly had on match 1st - how was he going to do it ?

its not a trick question

now the big question - IF Breitbart did actually plan to release the material he alledgedly had on match 1st - how was he going to do it ?

reply to post by ignorant_ape

Let me attempt to get this straight,

You blame posters for jumping to conclusions without having any basis in facts.....

then you ask them to answer a question that no one can know the answer to..... according to the facts available?

When it comes right down to it, it isn't some kind of 'leap of faith' to surmise that AB did plan to release tape(s) in the near term, given what he said before his death and what his confidant has said since. Is there reason to doubt what was said regarding a March 1st release?

Originally posted by ignorant_ape
i read these threads regarding mr Breitbart , and despair - so few people seem to have any grasp of the facts , or even care - all they wish to do is spin the tail to fit thier personal ideology

the facts of the matter are :

feb 10 2012 - mr Breitbart , claims to have access to one or more peices of film / video footage from obamas ` college days ` and further that he will ensure obama is ` properly vetted this election `

now with zero evidence - people have leaped to the " fact " that Breitbart planned to release the tapes / films on march 1st

Where are you getting your info?
Here's what Breitbart stated:
www.infowars.com...

“I’ve got video from his college days that show you why racial division and class warfare are central to what hope and change was sold in 2008 – the videos are going to come out,” said Breitbart, adding that Obama would be vetted.

He stated that the videos are coming out. He specifically mentioned March 1st.
Now, I don't claim to be a genius, but I do have some ability to comprehend the English language. It pretty much seems to me that he meant that the videos would be released on that date. IF he was murdered, I would also think his assailants believed this, too.

Also:

Breitbart spoke of his intention to release the tape during his CPAC speech last month. The footage shows Obama in his college days appearing alongside former Weather Underground terrorists Bill and Bernardine Dohrn. Observers had speculated that the footage could have derailed Obama’s hopes for a second term.

He said this in a speech in front of many people, not just his associate.

Really. It's not a stretch to believe that this is what he intended on doing with the videos.
I'm not understanding why you have a problem with how people have interpreted the facts.

Does it really matter what it was/is in the vids? So what if it's a steamy homosexual orgy or Muslim worship or smoking reefer or his professor diddling him or what-so-bloody-ever. Does it really matter? He was at university - Ivy League university. What is college for if not for getting up to no good? What is youth for if not to sew some wild oats and to do stuff you might not do otherwise? How many of you have lived every bloody moment of your lives in a guarded fashion just in the off-chance you might be a party candidate someday?

Of all of the options that this "explosive" revelation might possibly be, what would be worst? Why? To you or to everyone? So how is it so earth-shattering? In the big picture, does it even really matter? Because you know...haters are just gonna hate. Doesn't matter what you do. Haters just hate.

The real problem with politics is that people keep participating in such a totally bogus pack of lies in the first place. Until the whole system is torn down and re-tooled (no pun intended there, though it does work, doesn't it? lol), no one on the face of the Earth will have their say. The present system is rife with corruption and the corrupt. When you play with fire, you will get burnt.

reply to post by CosmicEgg

Does it really matter what it was/is in the vids? So what if it's a steamy homosexual orgy or Muslim worship or smoking reefer or his professor diddling him or what-so-bloody-ever. Does it really matter?

actually it would matter, others have been fired for less and had there been a video of Monica under Bill's desk he would have been canned too

He was at university - Ivy League university.

can you actually prove that he was?
while you are at it can you actually prove there was any hope and change spread around?