Ahmadinejad is the Hitler of our time. The Radical islamic Iran and Naize Germany connection

Originally posted by BiggerPicture
Amadinejad hasn't exactly invaded/attacked any country... nor has Iran in some 100s years.

I would say building a nuclear bomb
knowing damn well the intent of it
was not defense but to use it to
terrorize other nations, compromising
the sovereignty of those nations,
IS AN ACT OF WAR and aggression.

reply to post by popsmayhem


but they have not built a bomb. I do not see the logic of your argument. Our own intelligence services as well as many others don't think they are building one. I say that even if they were, considering their track record as far as invasions or acts of aggression, I don't think they plan on using said weapons on any nation. The fact that their one enemy(Iraq) has been utterly destroyed by US forces negates any possibility of them using it on their enemies as well.

I fail to see the logic of your argument. Again, I think it based on emotion since these facts are available to everyone.

By the time he spells his name he is dead.

Originally posted by munkey66
your whole story breaks down so easily.

You compare Ahmadinejad to Hitler,
Hitler was loved and was admired around the world by world leaders as well as the public in general.

Ahmadinejad is not that popular and does not have the backing of the wider community.

I can tell you there is a president who is loved around the world and was even given highly recocnized prize who shows more of a similarity to Hitler than Ahmadinejad does.

Forgetting one point, Hitler never had a nuclear bomb.
Hitler had to get people to trust him
Ahmadinejihadi is VERY liked (just take a look around ATS).
by tens of millions, not to mention china, russia, venezulia.
The guy is praised here daily.

Not going to bother reading this thread, total nonsense. Lol. The closet we are to fascism doesnt come fro
iran but from the USA, corporate fascism is now the dominant force in the US and UK, but not for long.

reply to post by popsmayhem


lol at your disinfo...

reply to post by BIHOTZ


I am just trying to point out that Iran do have a tolerence to Jews. They are not trying to take over the world and if the person who believes that was taking the piss, then haha good one.

reply to post by popsmayhem


Believe it or not he doesn't seem to spew as much crap as the western leaders.

2nd.

reply to post by Swills

Ahmednejad do not have the support of the whole country so he can't be compared to Hitler. He does not " walk the talk " and the real power lies with the Ayatollah. Besides whatever he says is just an angry rant. Don't think he has a plan if he really wanted to fight Israel.

reply to post by popsmayhem


First of all, Hitler was the head of Nazi Germany. Ahmadinejad is not the head of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Second of all, please do tell us, exactly who

Some people believe

those some people are. You know, if you want us to take you serious(won't happen).

Claiming they come in peace..

First of all, Iran is a country. Countries are stationary. They do not move. Iran has surely not moved over the past 5000 to 10000 years. It is other people who claim they come in peace and then end up killing over a million civilians.

Fear and ignorance had them trying to justify every action of Germany.

Is this thread about WW2 and Nazi Germany? Or did you forget to take a pill?

"The IAEA can confirm that Iran has started the production of uranium enriched up to 20 percent

And they are allowed, via the treaty they signed, to enrich uranium up to 20 percent.

After they hit 20% enrichment it will only take 6 months
to get to 90% and there's your bomb.

We have a nuclear scientist on these boards guys!

This is not propaganda, or opinion. Them are the facts.

It did not work with Nazi Germany, and it will not

Listen mr. traitor to America, bower to Israeli interests...you are here with an agenda as are the rest of your internet "army" buddies. That is; liken Iran to Nazi Germany and the chance the US might intervene may go up, so you are part of a plan to steer public opinion.

Israel is about at the end of its lifeline, it has been said many times before that they are doing themself disservice by involving themselves in too many things, trying to control too many people.

I wonder what would happen if Iran would have smuggled and spread 260 Billion US $ into Israel. Would they have the same kind of inflation Iran has today? WINK WINK.

reply to post by slanteye


Israel will be stretched against Iran. Iran pretty much pretend Israel do not exist when it comes to conflict. Iran actually believe they will shake Israel off like a bad case of fleas, now that is confidence and Israel should be worried if they have not got assistance.

With that the Saudis will be brought into the conflict for simply letting Israel use their airspace. If this does kick off it will spiral out of control like nothing we have seen in our lifetimes.

The Hitler of our time huh?

There are several things wrong with the OP. For starters, Hitler was the leader of Germany. Ahmadinejad is not the leader of Iran. He is the President, but even he answers to another. Unlike Hitler who answered to no one after he altered the law of the land and ushered in a Dictatorship and abolished the German Parliamentary Democracy that was in place prior to his rise in power.

I find it so cute how you mention the "radical religious leaders" of Iran while presenting your argument. What makes it so funny to me is that Hitler was a Christian who believed in Christ. The Christian religion is not really considered "radical" but we should fear Islam? More people have died in the name of the Christian God but I should fear Islam? I can tell you for a fact that Islam has never done anything to me.... Christians have.. but I digress.

Also claiming that Hitler would have used a nuclear weapon is probably true. I have very little doubt he would have used one, but that was a different time. No one else had such weapons at the time. That little fact is a huge game changer. Do you really think if Japan had a nuclear weapon, the US would have dropped nuclear weapons on them first knowing that a retaliatory strike of equal of greater destruction would have been the result?

But let us get the meat and potatoes of the OP and discuss this 20% enrichment.

After they hit 20% enrichment it will only take 6 months to get to 90% and there's your bomb. Iran claims it needed the 20% enriched uranium for its research facility..

This is not propaganda, or opinion. Them are the facts.

Here are the REAL FACTS!

Now in the OP you state that the Iranians claim that 20% enrichment is for use in research reactors. So what is a common level of enrichment for Research Reactors? 12% to 19.75% is. Therefor being at 20% enrichment is still perfectly acceptable for the purposes stated by the Iranians. We are talking a difference of .25%, is that really enough to go to war over when the evidence of actual bomb making has not been proven and the evidence to suggest they are making a bomb is minimal at best?

However, let us assume what you are saying is "fact". Can you prove that Iran can go from 20% enrichment to 85% enrichment (the minimum used in nuclear weapons and the same level of enrichment used in the bombs dropped on Japan at the end of WW2) within 6 months time?

The facts are, Iran began their nuclear program with the help from the US in 1957 with the Atoms for Peace program which was a research program with the purpose of finding peaceful uses of Atomic Energy brought about by the Eisenhower Administration. So it has taken Iran 55 years to reach a level of 20% enrichment but they are supposed to go from 20% to 85% in 6 months?

In the 1970's the Shah approved plans, with the help from the United States, to build up to 23 Nuclear Power station by the year 2000. Have you bothered to ask yourself why the US would help Iran to develop Atomic Energy if they are so dangerous? Why is it ok for Iran to develop this Atomic Energy with the help of the US, but if they choose to do it on their own that is unacceptable?

So is Ahmadinenjad the Hitler of our time?

Not even in the same ballpark. You can not compare the two. Ahmadinejad nor Iran have attacked anyone in over 100 years. Previous to WW2 Germany attacked others in WW1 and was eventually faulted for WW1 which lead to the Treaty of Versailles which many believe laid the ground work for Hitler's rise to power.

Sorry to say, your facts are not facts at all. They are opinions. If you would like some real facts, I would suggest you do much more research on all the areas I laid out for you.

That is one of the things that really annoy me: People focusing on Ahmadinejad. He's nothing more than what Comical Ali (Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf) was in Iraq, which is a governmental mouthpiece.

You do realize that there are 13 people in Iran that are politically higher than him, right?

Ali Khamenei
Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati
Abbasali Kadkhodai
Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi
Mohammad Reza Modarresi-Yazdi
Mohammad Momen
Gholamreza Rezvani
Mohammad Yazdi
Mohammad Reza Alizadeh
Ebrahim Azizi
Gholamhossein Elham
Mohsen Esmaili
Abbas Ka'bi
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

Iran a threat? Very plausible, yes. Ahmadinejad a threat? No.

If it wasn't for Iran WWIII had allready began a few years ago because of the insisting provocations of the USA. Iran and other islamic nations in the middle east refuse to take the bait.

Unfortunately there will come a day when one of them says enough is enough. Or corrupt elements in the US government will become so restless and frustrated that they will plant a false flag event that will spark WWII.

And guess who will be blamed.

reply to post by InfoKartel

Israel is about at the end of its lifeline, it has been said many times before that they are doing themself disservice by involving themselves in too many things, trying to control too many people

actually Israel (the Hebrews) will be around for a long long time, a deal they made about what 2500 years ago. No they get the spoils of the earth, that was the promise.

Originally posted by popsmayhem
Some people believe Iran is a threat, they do not want peace,
they are building a nuclear bomb and that they should


so which country did the Iran invade so far?

just wondering since you're comparing Iran with Nazi Germany; making a connection where there is no connection.

did I miss something?

reply to post by Redevilfan09

OK, so after your last post what makes you think that the Iranians are looking to dominate the globe.

Its is their religion, they are commanded to do so. I dont blame you for thinking MSM is a big Cinema Flick but take a look around at the Honor Killings happening and Iran taking hostages/prisoners either holding then for years or beheading them. Do not give me crap about GTMO. That place is a forkin country club.
Apple and oranges in comparison

If what you just posted is correct, then that would make the Zionists in Israel the threat, wouldn't it?

Israel is sitting on a prime piece of real estate which happens to be holy ground for many religions, Get real with your argument and get off the band wagon

reply to post by popsmayhem


Not only do they not have a nuke but the CIA admits they are not building a nuke, & all of agencies to say this I'd expect the CIA to be the last admit this since they excel in foreign espionage.

Originally posted by rebellender

actually Israel (the Hebrews) will be around for a long long time, a deal they made about what 2500 years ago. No they get the spoils of the earth, that was the promise.

edit on 2-3-2012 by rebellender because: (no reason given)

Let's put that little bon mot where it belongs, shall we? The promise was conditional, Israel and Judah sinned to such a degree that God denounced their sins, divorced them both as His people, had pagan nations remove them from the land, and annulled the covenant. You need to read the ENTIRE OT, dude. The initial promise is not the whole story, Jewish propaganda to the contrary notwithstanding.