It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheStev
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
Heck, even the pigmy people that were discovered recently had a certain amount of that stigma - just because they were something outside of our current understanding.
And if you've seen the skull, you know that if this is an unknown humanoid race it is far more controversial than the pigmies.
Originally posted by maryhinge
reply to post by bottleslingguy
i always wondered why some would not do
the tests when they heard the name starchild
now we know why if true i do hope so
you could say the exact same thing for any goverment scientist. They'll get the results they're told to get. You are right though, this needs to be tested by others aswell. You'd have thought that science labs all over the world would be jumping up and down to get the chance to sample it. To try and see if they can prove/disporove that this skull could be a new type of human, or even something more exotic. It'd be a career breaking deal for any scientist. So, where are they all?
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by Equ1nox
This is in-house testing performed by his very own pet geneticist, unless independent verification is done this is all meaningless. As of right now we have zero, less than zero since a pet geneticist reeks of a cover up.
Originally posted by Miccey
So can you guys enlighten me
to WHY this WOULDNT be
EARTH originated...
Even IF its NOT human, what
makes it NON terrestrial....
Well the fact it is genetically so different from all primates, yet structurally appears to be a primate. Not only is it starkly different from the known order of primates, it exhibits genetic characteristics that are starkly different from all Earth species, including mammals, reptiles, etc. All Earth species are genetically similar to some considerable degree. The FOXP2 genes is one of the most static sequences in our Human genetic make-up, and when compared to the FOXP2 gene in other species you can get a good idea of how different we are from those species. The following graph they present shows how much we differ from a few different species in this respect, but look at the difference compared to the FOXP2 gene of the Starchild, the thing is way off the scales if this data is legitimate:
Originally posted by Miccey
So can you guys enlighten me
to WHY this WOULDNT be
EARTH originated...
Even IF its NOT human, what
makes it NON terrestrial....
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
Well the fact it is genetically so different from all primates, yet structurally appears to be a primate. Not only is it starkly different from the known order of primates, it exhibits genetic characteristics that are starkly different from all Earth species, including mammals, reptiles, etc. All Earth species are genetically similar to some considerable degree. The FOXP2 genes is one of the most static sequences in our Human genetic make-up, and when compared to the FOXP2 gene in other species you can get a good idea of how different we are from those species. The following graph they present shows how much we differ from a few different species in this respect, but look at the difference compared to the FOXP2 gene of the Starchild, the thing is way off the scales if this data is legitimate:
Originally posted by Miccey
So can you guys enlighten me
to WHY this WOULDNT be
EARTH originated...
Even IF its NOT human, what
makes it NON terrestrial....