It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
"When Hector Siliezar visited the ancient Mayan city of Chichen Itza with his wife and kids in 2009, he snapped three iPhone photos of El Castillo, a pyramid that once served as a sacred temple to the Mayan god Kukulkan. A thunderstorm was brewing near the temple, and Siliezar was trying to capture lightning crackling dramatically over the ruins.
In the first two images, dark clouds loom above the pyramid, but nothing is amiss. However, in the third photo, a powerful beam of light appears to shoot up from the pyramid toward the heavens, and a thunderbolt flashes in the background."
Originally posted by darkest4
"It only showed up in the photo we didn't see it" is always the first red flag to me. People are so ignorant about how much # "shows up in a photo" because of various camera and lighting effects/glitches/etc. I mean hell, "believers" here even call simple lens flare "nibiru" or "ufos" all the damn time in countless threads.
The article perfectly explained a much more reasonable explanation by an EXPERT and yet people still want to just believe it's some magic or something ridiculous no matter what just cause it fits in with their fantasies and world views. Sigh.edit on 28-2-2012 by darkest4 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by WinnieDaWho
Originally posted by darkest4
"It only showed up in the photo we didn't see it" is always the first red flag to me. People are so ignorant about how much # "shows up in a photo" because of various camera and lighting effects/glitches/etc. I mean hell, "believers" here even call simple lens flare "nibiru" or "ufos" all the damn time in countless threads.
The article perfectly explained a much more reasonable explanation by an EXPERT and yet people still want to just believe it's some magic or something ridiculous no matter what just cause it fits in with their fantasies and world views. Sigh.edit on 28-2-2012 by darkest4 because: (no reason given)
Could it be so fast that can be only captured by a camera? I dunno
And for those claiming this photo is fake, why the hell would a Research techinician risk loosing his job in NASA just to explain a flawed photo!?? Of course he knew the photo was legit!!
And if the photo is said to be just a glitch, why does the beam sits perfectly on top of the pyramid? If its a glitch than the whole image must have that beam ayt?
The article perfectly explained a much more reasonable explanation by an EXPERT