Louis Farrakhan Denies Muslims Responsible For 911. Suggest's Jews May Assassinate Obama

Originally posted by sonnny1

Originally posted by theubermensch

. Now I'm not proud of Hitler's evil toward Jewish people, but that's a matter of record. He rose Germany up from nothing. Well, in a sense you could say there is a similarity in that we are rising our people up from nothing, but don't compare me with your wicked killers.

en.wikipedia.org...
That sounds better now doesnt it?

Actually,NOTHING Hitler did for Germany gave them the prestige that they have today!
Its actually their worst moment in history.

Hes not proud of Hitlers evil,on the other hand he can legitimize that evil,by comparing his leadership,with that of Hitlers.... "Rising from nothing". Its total garbage.

Germany was a mess when he took power. He turned things around. He did many great things.

Originally posted by thedrunkhacker
Please read scarcasm in the dictionary before my this.

Israel is a country of love not hate
Israel does not believe in an eye for an eye
Israel forgives
Israel does not cry wolf
Israel benefits the world
Israel is selfless
Israel is not racist/religoracist
Israel's noble price winners ALL give something good not evil to our magic blue dot
Israel does not participate in terrorism
Israel is not as Jesus said Satan's synagogue
Israel will not create WW3

Ha!

Originally posted by sonnny1

Originally posted by theubermensch

. Now I'm not proud of Hitler's evil toward Jewish people, but that's a matter of record. He rose Germany up from nothing. Well, in a sense you could say there is a similarity in that we are rising our people up from nothing, but don't compare me with your wicked killers.

en.wikipedia.org...
That sounds better now doesnt it?

Actually,NOTHING Hitler did for Germany gave them the prestige that they have today!
Its actually their worst moment in history.

Hes not proud of Hitlers evil,on the other hand he can legitimize that evil,by comparing his leadership,with that of Hitlers.... "Rising from nothing". Its total garbage.

Is that what they call what is Germany today? A nation with prestige?

I'll tell you what I see.

I see a nation its own people no longer run and are afraid to question HIS-tory because of the fear they will be jailed.
I see pre ww2 Germany. A Germany that was run by a criminal banking cabal that enslaved the good people similiar to that of the banking cabal running appr %75 of the globe now and enslaving all of us.

I also see Germany intentionally destroyed through forced immigration. so that they can never rise up again and fight the criminals running their nation into oblivion.

Yea, prestige. Doesn't sound all that great to me.

As a Muslim, I find the Nation of Islam to be nothing more than a cult, and the words of their leaders (except for Malcolm X) to be nothing more than cult mumbo jumbo.

Originally posted by nusnus
As a Muslim, I find the Nation of Islam to be nothing more than a cult, and the words of their leaders (except for Malcolm X) to be nothing more than cult mumbo jumbo.

I agree,they are pretty extreme. But I like that they ask some of the questions that everyone else is afraid to ask.

This Farrakhan guy is supposed to be the guy that had Malcolm X killed.

Originally posted by theubermensch

Originally posted by nusnus
As a Muslim, I find the Nation of Islam to be nothing more than a cult, and the words of their leaders (except for Malcolm X) to be nothing more than cult mumbo jumbo.

I agree,they are pretty extreme. But I like that they ask some of the questions that everyone else is afraid to ask.

This Farrakhan guy is supposed to be the guy that had Malcolm X killed.

We were "told" by the "media" that he had Malcom killed.

I dont know if I can believe that considering the sources.

reply to post by theubermensch

hahahahaha, ppl actually listen to this fruitcake?
i thought he was escorted to a rubber room back in the early 80s ... what a schmuck.

this fool and his speeches do nothing but breed distrust, discord and discontent amongst those who absorb his flavor of hysteria.

geeeeeesh, they should have found a more appropriate speaker.
ppl with a shred of common sense might have actually paid attention.

Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by theubermensch

 

schmuck.
\

that one word describes everything about your agenda

reply to post by theubermensch


Yea he admitted to 'having said things that prepared the situation for it'. But from a completely religious standpoint, any system that allows for some sort of human hierarchy or organization where people are lead by a single person, and have to obey that single person to be apart of the group is not only against Islam but kind of cult-like.

And they took the obligatory five pillars and made some changes so some are obligatory and others are not.

Perhaps the man is politically active and asks questions no one has asked, but I'd be very very careful as to how I take his messages if I were you.

Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by theubermensch

 

hahahahaha, ppl actually listen to this fruitcake?
i thought he was escorted to a rubber room back in the early 80s ... what a schmuck.

this fool and his speeches do nothing but breed distrust, discord and discontent amongst those who absorb his flavor of hysteria.

geeeeeesh, they should have found a more appropriate speaker.
ppl with a shred of common sense might have actually paid attention.

Do you prefer an Obama speech? You like Romney flim flam? What shmucks do you listen to? Did you listen to the Ahmadinejad speech in New York? Or did you nod at msn when they told you it was crazy? There is more truth in a Farrakhan or Ahmadinejad speech than in any speech written for any current politician. Thats just common sense. Who do you listen to genius?

Originally posted by nusnus
reply to post by theubermensch

 

Yea he admitted to 'having said things that prepared the situation for it'. But from a completely religious standpoint, any system that allows for some sort of human hierarchy or organization where people are lead by a single person, and have to obey that single person to be apart of the group is not only against Islam but kind of cult-like.

And they took the obligatory five pillars and made some changes so some are obligatory and others are not.

Perhaps the man is politically active and asks questions no one has asked, but I'd be very very careful as to how I take his messages if I were you.

prepared?????/

A little spin will do ya

Originally posted by alienorgy

Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by theubermensch

 

schmuck.

that one word describes everything about your agenda

what agenda? his history speaks for itself.
i simply stated a well known observation.
you like him?? that's your prerogative, suckers are born every minute.

equally relevant but slightly ruder, i could have said ... what a jerk ... same, same.
so, how does his status as either jerk or schmuck give me an agenda?
care to elaborate on that theory?

define schmuck
noun ˈshmək
Definition of SCHMUCK
slang
: jerk 4b

edit to add: i'm guessing you skipped the part about engaging a more appropriate speaker on purpose?
notice, i didn't comment on his speech ... just the speaker ... which, for all intents and purposes was less then effective.
persons who tune-out the speaker generally don't hear the speech.

Originally posted by Honor93

Originally posted by alienorgy

Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by theubermensch

 

schmuck.
\

that one word describes everything about your agenda

what agenda? his history speaks for itself.
i simply stated a well known observation.
you like him?? that's your prerogative, suckers are born every minute.

equally relevant but slightly ruder, i could have said ... what a jerk ... same, same.
so, how does his status as either jerk or schmuck give me an agenda?
care to elaborate on that theory?

define schmuck
noun \ˈshmək\
Definition of SCHMUCK
slang
: jerk 4b

I can bet my life that you never listened to an actual speech by him in its entirety and you get your opinion from tidbits and other brainwashed peoples opinion.

Either way, Im not a sucker for hearing him out nor am I one for agreeing with him or David Duke.

They are fighting the criminal cabal . If you like the criminal cabal then that's your right.

I do not.

Originally posted by theubermensch

Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by theubermensch

 

hahahahaha, ppl actually listen to this fruitcake?
i thought he was escorted to a rubber room back in the early 80s ... what a schmuck.

this fool and his speeches do nothing but breed distrust, discord and discontent amongst those who absorb his flavor of hysteria.

geeeeeesh, they should have found a more appropriate speaker.
ppl with a shred of common sense might have actually paid attention.

Do you prefer an Obama speech? You like Romney flim flam? What shmucks do you listen to? Did you listen to the Ahmadinejad speech in New York? Or did you nod at msn when they told you it was crazy? There is more truth in a Farrakhan or Ahmadinejad speech than in any speech written for any current politician. Thats just common sense. Who do you listen to genius?

what does any of this rambling nonsense have to do with your topic?
i've listened to many schmucks over the years but i learned to tune this one out (probably) before you were born.

no to Obama, no to Romney and yes, i read Achminabadjob's nonsense too.
i don't do msm if i can avoid it (my, my you're an awfully presumptuous one aren't you?)

this thread isn't about AchminaBADjob's ramblings, why are you focusing on them?
actually, my comments weren't about ANY SPEECH, or did you skip that part on purpose?

this genius reads rather listen.
i used to listen to the CBS Radio Mystery Theatre many years ago but that was the last of the sci-fi audibles i really enjoyed.

back when msm was born, i watched/listened to all of them ... NBC, CBS & ABC ... but then again, in those days, we were taught to think for ourselves rather be spoon-fed by some boob-tube.
sorry for your generation.

psssssst ... just because you think you're familiar with the speaker says nothing about the speech writer.
and in this instance, the speech writer was poorly represented by this speaker, capice?

reply to post by theubermensch

ya know, if you're intentionally derailing your own thread, be my guest.
there are better and more interesting playgrounds in this arena.

besides, Fauxakhan doesn't interest me one bit after his escapades over the decades.
feel free to revel in his brand of hatred all you want ... it concerns me not.

It wouldn't surprise me a bit that their plan to galvanize the American Sheep into an anti-Iran stampede includes taking out a sitting president via Mossad.. Voted for him or not, if he gets whacked and the public catches a whiff of falafel planted a the scene it won't be a very good day to be of Iranian descent.

This Israeli gov't is dirty like that; they're not above using such tactics. The U.S.S. Liberty comes to mind.

Originally posted by alienorgy

Originally posted by Honor93

Originally posted by alienorgy

Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by theubermensch

 

schmuck.
\

that one word describes everything about your agenda

what agenda? his history speaks for itself.
i simply stated a well known observation.
you like him?? that's your prerogative, suckers are born every minute.

equally relevant but slightly ruder, i could have said ... what a jerk ... same, same.
so, how does his status as either jerk or schmuck give me an agenda?
care to elaborate on that theory?

define schmuck
noun \ˈshmək\
Definition of SCHMUCK
slang
: jerk 4b

I can bet my life that you never listened to an actual speech by him in its entirety and you get your opinion from tidbits and other brainwashed peoples opinion.

Either way, Im not a sucker for hearing him out nor am I one for agreeing with him or David Duke.

They are fighting the criminal cabal . If you like the criminal cabal then that's your right.

I do not.

if you are willing to "bet your life", it must not be worth much to ya.
i have heard, listened and read many of his speeches since early 1970s ... long before he became the figure-head he is recognized as today.

He is an admitted hypocrite. here's one source

Regarding your question and comment about the Messenger's remarks about Farrakhan in 1972: --- snip --- So yes, at the time Messenger Elijah Muhammad spoke these good words, Minister Farrakhan had not yet turned hypocrite. It was not until after The Messenger's death that Farrakhan turned and then admitted being a hypocrite.

And the Messenger made it clear to us, how to deal with hypocrites.

sooooo, since when are admitted hypocrites who continue on the same path highly regarded in any frame of common sense?

good for you, i happen to dislike both men and their public representations of their beliefs... Fauxakhan and the Duck but again, that isn't this topic is it?

i read about both of the presentations online, here first and other alt sites for more info ... what does it matter?

if you care to discuss the particulars of the speech, please do so but it really didn't interest me that much ... old news you might say. i'm just simply amazed and dumb-founded that anyone with a smidgen of common sense pays this man one iota of attention, he doesn't deserve it.

never said YOU were a sucker, i just mentioned they are born every minute. (nice try though)
fighting the criminal cabal ??? what kind of msm comment is that exactly and what criminal cabal?
can you name names ?? how 'bout financiers ?? or maybe guberment insiders ??
you got anything substantial or just more Faux type rhetoric?

personally, i don't fight imaginary ghosts ... but if it floats your boat, enjoy

Closing for review

The END of Hate Speech, subtle or otherwise, on ATS