Schumann Resonances, Electro Magnetism, and the Brain.

reply to post by buddhasystem


You don't know what you're talking about.

And you never will, at the rate you're going.

Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by buddhasystem

 

You don't know what you're talking about.

It's safe to say that I know a whole lot more about construction and principles of operation of nuclear weapons than you do. Which fairly obvious fact you predictably ignore with predictable hubris.

Your toaster is a time-warping wormhole device tapping vacuum energy via scalar Tesla field. That's what makes bread brown, and it's all based on harmonics. There, I said it. Woo-hoo.

reply to post by pianopraze

Energy Grids

. . . A New Zealand pilot, Bruce Cathie, was convinced that scientists do know all about the energy grids, but are withholding the information from the public, Newman reported. . . .

The following is a screenshot from the YouTube video "Hugh Newman - Earth Grids - Megalithomania South Africa 2011 (Day1)" Uploaded on May 23, 2011 by MegalithomaniaUK:

From the documentary Resonance - Beings of Frequency:



Link

Originally posted by Mary Rose
From the documentary Resonance - Beings of Frequency:

Yes, and doing serious astronomy is also impossible in the city. They usually build telescopes on mountains. So what. And oh by the way, you can't really whisper in a night club. I thought people knew that.

Originally posted by Mary Rose
I have her book Breakthrough to Creativity on order.

I received my copy and what a good book it is!

We are not limited by our 5 senses. Of this I am now certain. The question is, how can we all get on board and use our higher sense perception?

Originally posted by Mary Rose
The question is, how can we all get on board and use our higher sense perception?

The answer is, study. Learn. There are plenty of textbooks out there. Once you are on this path, you'll notice how your perception grows. Sorry no shortcuts.

This book is copyright 1967 and the publisher is DeVorss & Co., Inc.

A passage from Chapter 1 "Journey of the Open Mind" is most interesting.

Have you ever heard of "thought-photography"?

. . . I had an appointment to meet Mr. A., who was doing some very unusual things with a "so-called" camera which he had built. He felt sure that the camera was taking pictures, at a distance, of the internal organs of the body. In addition, he got a number of different types of pictures associated with mineral compounds. These pictures showed specific patterns to be associated with certain specific substances. As far as he knew the camera was doing a remarkable job.

He was shocked and astonished to find, when he sold one of his cameras, that nothing appeared on the film when someone else operated the camera. . . . Actually I found that his camera was not a camera in the true sense. No light entered it and it had no lenses. . . . Magnetic fields and crystals also affected the pictures on the film. Eventually he discovered that when he concentrated on an object or an organ of the body a picture of the object or organ would appear on the film. When he thought of a certain chemical compound he got a characteristic pattern in the case of any given compound.

. . . Two years later, to my surprise, I saw some of these pictures on exhibit at the Eastman Kodak Laboratories under the label "thought-photography." One of their technicians explained to me that these pictures could not be accounted for by any known method of photography. . . .

reply to post by Mary Rose

I'm not surprised as I have seen a camera that can see into the future.

Can you provide evidence of the claim? If not then why would anyone believe this just because someone said it?

reply to post by DenyObfuscation


Because the someone who said it is a reliable source, in my opinion. I am familiar with Shafica Karagulla's work.

Why would you make such a confrontational, sarcastic remark? Do you enjoy yourself doing that? I'm not impressed.

Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by DenyObfuscation

 

Because the someone who said it is a reliable source, in my opinion.

You have a record of extremely (and I would say purposely) poor judgement when you assign "reliable" designation to a source. From Bearden to Haramein to any number of other charlatans, mental cases and anything in between. Including Swerdlow, with his orgasm-powered device for opening interdimensional portals, and his service as intergalactic Ambassador on planet Umo. I'm sure that if you consider THAT a reliable source, a little mind-reading device needs to be taken for a given.

reply to post by Mary Rose

Because the someone who said it is a reliable source, in my opinion.

Reliable perhaps, perhaps not. Verifiable? That would be my question.

I am familiar with Shafica Karagulla's work.

Sounds familiar. Why am I thinking channeller?

Why would you make such a confrontational, sarcastic remark?

One reason is that clip is the first thing I thought of when reading your post. It wasn't meant to be confrontational.
From now on I will only post comments to you while I'm barefoot. That way I'll be sure to feel the eggshells I'm walking on.

Do you enjoy yourself doing that?

Sure, I enjoy having a little fun while trying to make a serious point.

I'm not impressed.

Long time since I've heard that from a woman. Still has no effect though. lol

This book is copyright 1967 and the publisher is DeVorss & Co., Inc.

A passage from Chapter 2 "Adventure into the Unknown":

. . . Dr. Dan was hesitant at first about explaining in detail how his Higher Sense Perception worked. When he realized that I was not critical but simply interested in the facts he was willing to be very frank with me. He could see an energy field interpenetrating the body and extending a few inches beyond the periphery of the body. What he saw in the field told him about conditions and function in the physical body. He looked first at the energy field and then at the physical body itself. In the physical body he could see where nerve currents were blocked or not moving in a healthy fashion. Under such conditions he often applied magnetic healing energy and could observe the effect on the nerve currents. . . .

reply to post by Mary Rose


OK so you believe that? I don't. How would you attempt to verify this, either for yourself or someone else? For the record Kirlian photography is a joke.

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by Mary Rose

 

OK so you believe that? I don't. How would you attempt to verify this, either for yourself or someone else?

I would guess that Mary would just get some "crystals" and "magnetic fields", and some film, and then will try to think really, really hard, in order to imprint her thoughts on the film. Then she would develop the film and see how that worked.

Does it make sense? But what if the crystals are legit but the film is still blank? Hmm...

Have you ever heard of "thought-photography"?

I think that term can be compared to the "observer effect," "non-locality," and "spooky action at a distance."

Originally posted by Mary Rose

Have you ever heard of "thought-photography"?

I think that term can be compared to the "observer effect," "non-locality," and "spooky action at a distance."

It's a long haul between observer effect and non-locality (which are legitimate topics) and Nensha.

A passage from Chapter 2 "Adventure into the Unknown":

Another one - HSP = Higher Sense Perception:

I was continually surprised to find how many members of the medical profession had HSP abilities and were using them. Certain things emerged from my many contacts with my colleagues. Most of them felt a little uneasy about their gifts, but finding them of value in their work they used them. Almost without exception they kept quiet about their unusual talents because they feared any mention of such things might hurt their professional standing. In most cases each had felt that perhaps he was alone and peculiar in this regard. They were one and all relieved to find someone within the profession with whom they could talk freely. The fact that there were many other physicians with similar abilities was comforting.

Yes. The open mind - how valuable it is.

Originally posted by Mary Rose
Yes. The open mind - how valuable it is.

The way you use "open mind" here - yes, it's certainly very valuable to the publishers of these books, who are hawking these wares to the gullible dimwits.

This book is copyright 1967 and the publisher is DeVorss & Co., Inc.

A passage from Chapter 3 "True Stories of Fantastic People":

. . . One evening I met a young scientist who is working with space programs. He was receiving very rapid promotion in the scientific world. He told me he considered information gained through Higher Sense Perception immensely valuable to scientific progress. He said he availed himself of help from several people who had Higher Sense Perception and the information gave excellent results when tested in the laboratory.

He was convinced that a great many people have HSP and use it. He pointed out that such people are not in the least disturbed by the academic pros and cons as to whether it does or does not exist.

. . . It has amazed me that at times individuals who lack adequate scientific training nevertheless come up with surprising scientific discoveries and useful inventions. For a number of years I have observed the work of a technician who has very definite Higher Sense Perception. . . . He has been able to demonstrate types of energy which have not yet been identified or explained by the scientific world. . . .

Because of this goldmine called the internet, more and more of this information is going to come out and eventually critical mass will be reached and the tyranny of ridicule and skepticism from the mainstream and supporters of the mainstream will be overcome.