It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
Just search Boswinkel here to get three vids demonstration and discussing his Biophoton healing machine
Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by buddhasystem
Spoken like a true particle physicist!
Originally posted by buddhasystem
While this also applies, I spoke more like a person capable of critical thinking and thinking in general.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by buddhasystem
While this also applies, I spoke more like a person capable of critical thinking and thinking in general.
I think others probably know where you're coming from better than you do yourself.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
You must be absolutely desperate.
However, the story is more than likely true. Yes, I'm a very astute and well-informed researcher.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by buddhasystem
Ever heard of cover stories? Assumed identities? Do you know anything about how the globalists operate?
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Boswinkel said that the mind has far greater capability than the brain and that the mind sits in the heart. He said that our memory is outside our body, although he also said that the cell has a memory and a mind of its own. Perhaps what he means is that the memory is not in the brain, but in the cells of the body, and also extending outward from the body to the body’s biofield, with the heart as the command center of this biofield. He also said that the proper role of the brain is to interpret only our own messages and not messages from the outside. He said he thinks thinking is a psychological disease. Maybe he's referring to the concept of trusting your heart over your head.
He mentioned that the Schumann resonance is increasing along with the consciousness of the planet.
Because light can carry much higher octaves of information than electric current (which is used by most other therapeutic devices), this technology corrects emotional and mental components of health problems as well as their physical components.
Originally posted by burntheships
Originally posted by Phage
I have a problem with this analogy.
It seems you have a problem with everything,
except the misleading "research" you post.
Although full spectrum, or bright white, light was previously thought to be necessary to treat sleep disorders, the short wavelength of blue light is now preferred, according to the "Journal of Clinical Sleep." Conversely, researchers at John Carroll University, of University Heights, Ohio, concluded that because exposure to blue light increases levels of serotonin and suppresses the release of melatonin, blue light-blocking glasses are also an effective treatment for some sleep disorders and symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, according to a 2007 ScienceDaily.com article. Skin Repair Blue light therapy is often used to treat acne, rosacea, psoriasis and wrinkles caused by sun damage and age. For acne patients who wish to avoid the side effects and potential long-term consequences of prescription medications, light therapy may be an ideal alternative. Because blue light frequencies effectively destroy bacteria, many dermatologists report patients treated with narrow-band blue light show significant improvement in acne conditions. Read more: www.livestrong.com...
It didn't matter what the frequency was. It could be infrared, red, blue, or green, as long as it was single although, as you move toward the red end of the spectrum, the rate of cellular regeneration increased. For instance, a single frequency in the green range might affect the kidney 40 times better than a normal base-line study, whereas a red would be about 4,000 times faster. So over the years they migrated to infrared, red and eventually the 660 nanometer wavelength because it was the fastest way to regenerate tissue. So if you have an injury you would normally recover from in ten days, you can actually recover that tissue in two days by treating it with light.
Despite many reports of positive findings from experiments conducted in vitro, in animal models, and in randomized controlled clinical trials, LLLT remains controversial. Tiina Karu has proposed (see Photobiological Sciences Online unit entitled "Action Spectra: Their Importance for Low Level Light Therapy") that mitochondria are a likely site for the initial effects of light, specifically that the enzyme cytochrome c oxidase (unit four in the mitochondrial respiratory chain) absorbs photons and increases its activity leading to increased ATP production, modulation of reactive oxygen species and induction of transcription factors (Turrens, 2003).
Originally posted by Mary Rose
I'm interested in this guy Boswinkel, so I googled his name. I found the website bodytalkmn.com, which has a page on "Biocohenerency Therapy and the STARLIGHT/CHIREN."
I think this is very interesting:
Because light can carry much higher octaves of information than electric current (which is used by most other therapeutic devices), this technology corrects emotional and mental components of health problems as well as their physical components.
I've never thought about light as opposed to electric current before.
Originally posted by nii900
www.non-newtonianphysics.com...
The neutrino has always had a credibility problem. It was originally hypothesized to fill an energy gap, and nothing more. Unlike other particles which are readily characterized by mass and charge, the neutrino seems to have neither. And once the theories for particles were formulated, there seemed no need to bestow the neutrino with properties. As a result, the neutrino has never really been regarded realistically. Physicists use it to balance their equations, but they have no rational concept of what it is or where it came from.
The neutrino, however, is a truly unique creation. By the very nature of its smallness it is able to transform electromagnetism into the strong nuclear force and to serve as the seed of particle formation. The strength of attraction depends on distance. Electromagnetism is limited by the size of the proton and electron. Inside a phton or particle, however, where distances are less, the same electric field at close range becomes the strong nuclear interaction that bonds the structure of particles.