Obama's hidden birth certificate now exposed

You people who believe this BS are an embarrassment to anyone with a functioning brain.

reply to post by filosophia


"I do not need to see Obama's birth certificate to know he is not American--his actions prove he is a globalist. "


---Can I use that as a signature?

Originally posted by xuenchen

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
The fake Kenyan BC was based on a real Australian BC....and snopes even has a pic. They even forgot to change the certificate number before they made the fake!

How do we know that the Australian one is not the fake ?

They might have made it after Obama's real one was discovered.

edit on Feb-25-2012 by xuenchen because: (no reason given)

Indeed ,

A few very good points were made about this in a older thread:

Originally posted by Got Questions?
Those are exactly the generalized doubts that can be instilled to perpetuate this. They are weak in my opinion.
I'm just too suspicious to think the Aussie BC is a slam-dunk.
1. This came to light within 24hrs of the Kenyan BC coming out
2. The apparent originator of this Aussie BC find appears to be an imaging expert.
3. Hacking & planting is not IMO outside the realm of reasonable suspicion.

Point 1 is a huge coincidence i say !

Originally posted by manna2
Anthony, The Supreme Court of the USA has allready ruled that Obama is not a natural born citizen and therefor ineligable to be the pres. of the USA.

Could yu please present evidence to back up this claim?
I think something of this magnitude would not have been missed by the masses, but apparently it has been missed by me and others here.
What source did you gather this info from?

“Since Barack Obama’s father was a citizen of Kenya, and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obama’s birth, then Senator Obama was a British citizen ‘at birth,’ just like the framers of the Constitution, and therefore, even if he were to produce an original birth certificate proving he were born on U.S. soil, he still wouldn’t be eligible to be president.”

He is not eliible to be president
www.washingtontimes.com...

as was pointed out

“How can he uphold the Constitution if he’s breaking it?”

A very true comment

So all you birthers take this as gospel immediately yet you tore the Hawaiian certificate apart for weeks trying to find anything that could make it possibly seen as fake. This Kenyan certificate has been around a long time and has been proven fake multiple times by many people.

The birther argument is about as lame as anything I have ever heard. Go after Romney and his Mexican father. If what you say is true then he isn't a citizen either. Get over yourselves and let it go. You are barking up a dead tree. You are just pissed because a black Democrat won.

I don't have an issue with someone being critical for facts or actualities but when you harp on the same old BS for years you really can't be taken seriously. Come on people, most of you are pretty intelligent but the birther thing really makes you seem ignorant and prejudice.

Originally posted by imnothereru


He is not eliible to be president
www.washingtontimes.com...

What your source states is that the court did not hear the case seeking to disqualify Obama from the presidency.
When the SCOTUS denies to hear the case, the denial marks the lower courts decision as standing.

In this case, by denying to hear the case, the SCOTUS deemed Obama eligible.

just so you know I did not make it up later.
read my sig at the bottom!
been like that for a long time.

how are they going to get out of THIS?
one guess.

Nice now we know for sure Obama's presidency was illegitimate maybe it will be easier to get rid of his facist policies.

Where is the CIA on this? Looks like an issue of national security to me. Especially how he is wrecking the country.

Originally posted by youdidntseeme

Originally posted by imnothereru


He is not eliible to be president
www.washingtontimes.com...

What your source states is that the court did not hear the case seeking to disqualify Obama from the presidency.
When the SCOTUS denies to hear the case, the denial marks the lower courts decision as standing.

In this case, by denying to hear the case, the SCOTUS deemed Obama eligible.

I do apologise i missed that line you are quite right the lower courts desicion does stand.

A decision not to grant a writ of certiorari — the legal term for the declaration that the justices will hear the case — would mean that a lower court ruling that dismissed the lawsuit can stand.

but doesnt mean to say i agree with it.

Originally posted by XanderV
This Kenyan certificate has been around a long time and has been proven fake multiple times by many people.

Not even by a longshot.

Originally posted by imnothereru
He is not eliible to be president
www.washingtontimes.com...

So your "evidence" that he is not eligible to be president is a court case that says he IS eligible....

It is very funny how birthers think! (actually how hey dont think!)

this thread is for the dim witted. who gives a crap anymore . move on.

Originally posted by spoor

Originally posted by imnothereru
He is not eliible to be president
www.washingtontimes.com...

So your "evidence" that he is not eligible to be president is a court case that says he IS eligible....

It is very funny how birthers think! (actually how hey dont think!)

You realize you look a bit ,silly, saying that after i posted this

Originally posted by imnothereru

Originally posted by youdidntseeme

Originally posted by imnothereru


He is not eliible to be president
www.washingtontimes.com...

What your source states is that the court did not hear the case seeking to disqualify Obama from the presidency.
When the SCOTUS denies to hear the case, the denial marks the lower courts decision as standing.

In this case, by denying to hear the case, the SCOTUS deemed Obama eligible.

I do apologise i missed that line you are quite right the lower courts desicion does stand.

A decision not to grant a writ of certiorari — the legal term for the declaration that the justices will hear the case — would mean that a lower court ruling that dismissed the lawsuit can stand.

but doesnt mean to say i agree with it

Originally posted by imnothereru
You realize you look a bit ,silly, saying that after i posted this

No, you are the one who looks silly, believing any rubbish a birther site posts without checking yourself....

reply to post by Rafe_


So then you have an explanation for how this single birth has been able to demonstrate more accurate precognitive powers than anyone in history? As has been pointed out many times now Kenya did not become a republic until 1964.

Originally posted by spoor

Originally posted by imnothereru
You realize you look a bit ,silly, saying that after i posted this

No, you are the one who looks silly, believing any rubbish a birther site posts without checking yourself....

birther,birther,birther,birther,birther,birther ...

You really like that word dont you (It is not even a word tho) do you sometimes parrot some other words aswell maybe or are you really truly the one trick pony you seem to be.

Originally posted by Rafe_

Originally posted by XanderV
This Kenyan certificate has been around a long time and has been proven fake multiple times by many people.

Not even by a longshot.

Rafe, if you truly believe that the BC has not been debunked time and time again, why not post a new thread where you point by point debunk the debunkers.

Explain to us all which came first, this one or the Aussie one. Explain how the fraudulent one was faked and by which processes.

Use that thread to explain to everyone how the BC bears the title of a country that didnt exist yet.

Take the time to intelligently break down the debunkers claims point by point.
Or do it here.

I would like to see that in a quest for the rtuth here