It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by truthrising2012
Flysolo and Armap thanks again for sharing your follow up via email and trying to find out the truth, this is exactly what more people need to do! I for one think that it's real as well, but it's hard to verify unless someone gets their hand on the relics and take it in for testing.
Wow were talking millions here in terms of appraisal value, so would ATS possible coordinate a donation/funding program to make a bid?
Originally posted by CaptainBeno
I am totally with you on that one. I believe they are very real.
Originally posted by FlySolo
When millions of dollars are at stake, well this opens up a whole new different level. Are these fake? Who would want to keep people from buying them? Who would want to buy them? This little thread subject just took a real sharp turn. I don't know much about the art industry, well anything actually, but this is serious SH!T. $47,000,000 is reason to kill for, to die for, to lie for.
I just want to add. If fake, then this is a very orchestrated and well organized criminal operation. Or, they will be met by a very organized criminal operation.
edit on 26-2-2012 by FlySolo because: (no reason given)
At the NATUHISTORI SCHES MUSEUM WIEN in VIENNA AUSTRIA, they only conducted a material test and the result was “kaolin” on one of the relics. Furthermore, a much more profound analysis was also done at UNAM in North America with kaolin on different relics from this collection and it indicated a clay like substance with a chemical composition A1251205 (OH) and it seemed to suggest that it is a silicate in layers.
All of the detail scientific studies that are stated were done at UNAM in North America
Originally posted by Pauligirl
Originally posted by FlySolo
When millions of dollars are at stake, well this opens up a whole new different level. Are these fake? Who would want to keep people from buying them? Who would want to buy them? This little thread subject just took a real sharp turn. I don't know much about the art industry, well anything actually, but this is serious SH!T. $47,000,000 is reason to kill for, to die for, to lie for.
I just want to add. If fake, then this is a very orchestrated and well organized criminal operation. Or, they will be met by a very organized criminal operation.
edit on 26-2-2012 by FlySolo because: (no reason given)
At those prices, they only have to find one gullible buyer. I wonder if the seller is willing to let a buyer have their own appraisal and tests done?
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by FlySolo
I think I will start an artefact business.
The "Scientific Studies" section, when they speak of the Austrian museum, was changed, now it reads:
At the NATUHISTORI SCHES MUSEUM WIEN in VIENNA AUSTRIA, they only conducted a material test and the result was “kaolin” on one of the relics. Furthermore, a much more profound analysis was also done at UNAM in North America with kaolin on different relics from this collection and it indicated a clay like substance with a chemical composition A1251205 (OH) and it seemed to suggest that it is a silicate in layers.
And:
All of the detail scientific studies that are stated were done at UNAM in North America