It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Good point. But when we talk of killing them, it is from their natural environment.
In that I guess the argument is pointless.
So to bring up their captivity, in comparison of hunting them and entrapping them and then slaughtering them, is moot.
It just proves more to me that humans are barbaric in their endeavors.
Originally posted by IgnorantSpecies
reply to post by mainidh
Good point. But when we talk of killing them, it is from their natural environment.
In that I guess the argument is pointless.
So to bring up their captivity, in comparison of hunting them and entrapping them and then slaughtering them, is moot.
It just proves more to me that humans are barbaric in their endeavors.
Well, I can understand what you mean on a commercial fishing level, it is deeply wrong to slaughter animals like that in such huge numbers.
But for example a native Inuit would be justified in killing a whale or dolphin for his family to survive the winter.
Evolution has given us the skills to conquer all other animals, but the morals not too. On a biological level killing is a necessity for most animals because they need to eat; and in a modern society hunting animals is often some peoples only revenue to be able to eat. So while it is not the norm it is in itself a biological process, just one that has evolved from society.
Captivity is in no way natural and why it may be bearable for some animals. I cannot help but think it would be worse than death for whales and dolphins due to their vast intelligence and migratory behaviors.