Shocking Annoucment about Chemtrails on MSM

reply to post by nuttin4U

Please, do explain why my peach tree, is already in FULL BLOOM?

That is odd! All that barium you claim is falling from the sky SHOULD HAVE KILLED IT long ago.

See ya,
Milt

Originally posted by Human_Alien--->The rest?....well, if they didn't sign up using their real names, with a traceable ISP address from the get-go then, who they claim they are now is irrelevant and a waste of bandwidth.

For a damn good reason, as people (including professional pilots) have been tracked down and harassed by conspiracy theorists before.

I've invited many users of this board over to our forum for professional pilots www.pprune.org...

So far just a couple have showed up, and behaved abusive enough to get themself banned.

Researchers fore truth? Sure.

reply to post by Goldcurrent

I do know that the intense flurry of chemtrail activity this winter has ceased to cool anything. Maybe it isn't meant to cool us down?

You'd better sit down... because I'm going to say something that just might "floor" you. Take a deep breath... this is going to be hard for you to believe.:
Just maybe... They weren't "chemtrails" at all!

See ya,
Milt

reply to post by Gmoneycricket

So on chemtrail flight paths they divert all other air traffic away?

I'm not qualified to answer that. But I will say that it is a very strong suspicion I have.

I wouldn't exactly say say they divert all traffic "away". I would say it's more likely that they keep all other air traffic far enough that they can not obtain a direct sample.

reply to post by NellahB

all I know that whenever our sky is covered with chem trails, a few days later we get rain.

Hmmm... that's interesting. I wonder why it used to rain before the Wright brothers went to Kitty Hawk. Go figure...

See ya,
Milt

reply to post by ThirdRock69

I wouldn't exactly say say they divert all traffic "away". I would say it's more likely that they keep all other air traffic far enough that they can not obtain a direct sample.

So you are saying that every ATC in the world are involved in this conspiracy?......remarkable

reply to post by Bex33

people who know least always shout the loudest

That's the only thing you've written that I agree with. The OP keeps proving that time, and time again.

See ya.
Milt

reply to post by NellahB

all I know that whenever our sky is covered with chem trails, a few days later we get rain

Wow!......that's almost like a weather front was moving in!.....those atmospheric conditions must have been ripe for cloud formation, any moisture in the air would likely have frozen and formed said cloud cover!.......good job there was no planes up there adding water content from the exhaust fumes that might freeze and form.......clouds........ if that were the case you may get rain.............hang on a minute

reply to post by Human_Alien
I live in Cocoa Beach a high number of folks over 50 y/o my wife included have skin cancer. With the accompanying surgury scares, tips of noses and ears missing or the ever present white gauze post surgical bandage on their nose, cheek, forearm, ear, neck forehead etc. from their latest visit to the dermatologist.The white gauze is not an uncomon sight aroud here and often noticed during my many times a week foray to Publix).
I have no skin cancers (I have naturally dark Dutch German skin though) lucky, I guess. Many of the 50 plusers, my wife and myself included share a common denominator. That being when our exposure to the sun occured.

The vast majority of the cancer causing damage to their skin was from the 60s, 70s & 80s. After the early 90s we all got serious about sunscreen, hats, shirts etc. (my wife had her first cancer diagnosed in the late 80s.)
Now me.......I was out in the sun for 3-4 hours yesterday with no sunburn or redness, lot of sun, little clouds. So my subjective opinion, I think things are pretty much status quo sun exposure wise. Business as usual for my afternoon of yard work. As far as ra red face.....Don't discount high blood pressure & alcoholism. There are a lot of old rummys in Florida (retired Yankees...jk)

About acid rain. Is the occurance of acid rain more or less prevelant with all of the "chem-trail" activity claimed these days? You should care about this subject. Being this statistic could be a way of validating or discounting the existance of chem-trails or at least the sulfur dioxide aspect..

reply to post by Argyll

So you are saying that every ATC in the world are involved in this conspiracy?......remarkable

When an ATC is informed that the military is conducting operations and to direct traffic away from them. That's all they are told. So how would they be involved in any way? How would they know anything about the operation taking place?

You may be lame at sarcasm but I don't think you're that dumb. Are you?

This was what was decided in Japan in October of 2010. I guess that pesky Earthquake maybe stalled any further meetings on the subject. I wonder how their talks are currently progressing?

the2012scenario.com...

Decisions on geoengineering cannot be made by small groups of scientists from a small group of countries that establish self-serving ‘voluntary guidelines’ on climate hacking. What little credibility such efforts may have had in some policy circles in the global North has been shattered by this decision. The UK Royal Society and its partners should cancel their Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative and respect that the world’s governments have collectively decided that future deliberations on geoengineering should take place in the UN, where all countries have a seat at the table and where civil society can watch and influence what they are doing.”

“The decision is not perfect,” said Neth Dano of ETC Group Philippines. “Some delegations are understandably concerned that the interim definition of geoengineering is too narrow because it does not include Carbon Capture and Storage technologies. Before the next CBD meeting, there will be ample opportunity to consider these questions in more detail. But climate techno-fixes are now firmly on the UN agenda and will lead to important debates as the 20th anniversary of the Earth Summit approaches. A change of course is essential, and geoengineering is clearly not the way forward.”

In Nagoya, Japan
Pat Mooney: [email protected] (Mobile +1-613-240-0045)
Silvia Ribeiro: [email protected] (Mobile (local): + 81 90 5036 4659)
Neth Dano: [email protected] (Mobile: + 63-917-532-9369)

In Montreal, Canada:
Diana Bronson: [email protected] (Mobile: +1-514-629-9236)
Jim Thomas: [email protected] (Mobile: +1-514-516-5759)

Note to Editors:
The full texts of the relevant decisions on geoengineering are copied below:
Under Climate Change and Biodiversity (UNEP/CBD/COP/10/L.36)
8. Invites Parties and other Governments, according to national circumstance and priorities, as well as relevant organizations and processes, to consider the guidance below on ways to conserve, sustainably use and restore biodiversity and ecosystem services while contributing to climate‑change mitigation and adaptation:

This article is a bit vague, but it does appear that the general concensus believes that geo-engineering is too difficult. It also seems that they are trying to stop field tests that may or may not be going on then and now.

reply to post by ThirdRock69

When an ATC is informed that the military is conducting operations and to direct traffic away from them. That's all they are told. So how would they be involved in any way? How would they know anything about the operation taking place? You may be lame at sarcasm but I don't think you're that dumb. Are you?

I have a Celestron 31145 telescope, that I primarily use for viewing the moon, But in the spring/summer months (living 5 miles from, and on the immediate flight path of an international airport) I view aircraft..........most of the aircraft I view are several hundred feet up on their final approach, but, I also view aircraft at maximum altitude......Now unless Thomas Cook and Emirates airlines are classed as military aircraft, your argument is moot, as I have seen both these, and many more commercial aircraft forming persistent contrails.........when atmospheric conditions are conducive.

And no.....I wasn't being sarcastic.......and I'm certainly not dumb.

reply to post by Argyll


Well next time why do get some proof to back up that statement.

Record the time and date. Look up the flight number. Take photos of the plane and the contrail over the entire period it is visible.

Sorry if I don't just take your word for it. I think the saying goes...."Pictures or it didn't happen."

reply to post by SurrealisticPillow

I just read your painfully ill written diatribe against "a regular group of avatars", and decided that I need to clear a up what I feel to be a huge discrepancy for you.:
Avatars are those little "thingies" that we find to the left of our posts. THEY ARE NOT INVOLVED IN ANY DAMN "CHEMTRAILER" VERSES "AVATAR" CONSPIRACY!

You are welcome in advance.

Now:
I dare you to tell me that "avatars" are what members of a flight crew are called!

See ya,
Milt

reply to post by ThirdRock69


Absolutely!

Now could I just ask......If I can take a picture of a commercial airliner laying a persistent contrail at (approx) 35,000 ft, and back it up with radar confirmation....will you agree that persistent contrails are a norm ?

Originally posted by Bex33
reply to post by SurrealisticPillow

 

Spot on, i second that.

I had no doubt that you would. That was a pretty well written post, considering your previous examples. Well done! And a to you as well.

See ya,
Milt

reply to post by Argyll


You can certainly provide them, with the right bit of research....no doubt you already know this.

For all, I invite a visit to ATS member waynos's profile. He/she has a good number of very, very clear photos of identified commercial airliners making perfectly ordinary contrails. Identified by radar tracking website resources.

Such as this recent post.

Or this one.

Other such photo examples are sprinkled amongst the member's other posts....may the member has a photo album that can be linked to? That would be a welcome resource addition.....I'm sure if asked the member wold be happy to reply with an answer.

reply to post by KJV1611

And thus that speak bad against it will be ignored.

Hell, that's the way it is now!

I learned more from that one post than I did the from all of the OP's posts combined! Way to go!

See ya,
Milt

reply to post by ThirdRock69


So do something like this?

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by Afterthought

It also seems that they are trying to stop field tests that may or may not be going on then and now.

Where does it say anything about "field tests" in your source? It is interesting when people go to the trouble of providing a link and citing it, then completely mis-interpret what is in it.

Just as this thread's OP has no mention of "chemtrails" in the actual video that was presented as the cornerstone of the thread premise.......only a nonsense title created by the original YouTube uploader.

Yet, the feeding frenzy of true "chem-believers" commenced right on schedule. Further mucking up the waters on the topic, and leading to ever more misinformation.

Frankly, this is beginning to look more like a ploy for those very, very valuable currencies.....S & Fs.

I'm sure they will be worth a lot of swag at the "ATS Store"....oh, wait.......