It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Unity_99
The whole book is nearly the work of others, and their research, but with his own words, quotes where necessary, and he changes his voice for the quotes when its spoken.
Originally posted by Unity_99
So no, he didn't admit the kind of fraud the title is suggesting.edit on 23-2-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Unity_99
No, I didn't say Henry was a liar. He has a right to question some things, though going on about David's death threat and drawing conclusions, the way they did, when I drew a completely different conclusion about it and thought the 200 000 hits was being revealed by David, as a kind of whistle blowing, showing that this group where the threats came from had a vested interest in some information getting out there. I consider judging him for his emotions, just meanness.
In the interview they didn't actually use the word fraud at all, and the one who was David's friend or friendly acquaintance shared something that was borderline altogether
and they resolved it, and most likely David learnt to be more considerate of others feelings, but of course that is a conclusion I'm reaching, but have watched his videos, and he does credit others with various findings, and the book I've ordered is heavily giving credit to others, that is the whole basis of the book bringing forth and connecting the dots on reems of coordinating information.
Its actually the Title Of This Thread that is Wrong and harmful, taking a leap beyond what was said and the vehement opinions that are expressed in the OP, that to me is just an agenda and shows how important David's book is that I'm reading, but then having gotten as far as we did in it already, um.... yes I can imagine they won't like that out.
Originally posted by Unity_99
Another thing in the interview, that was really alarming. The one being interviewed kept saying, that this information being brought out by whistleblowers couldn't be proved, so implying that, unless something can be "proved" (and that means weighed against the body of lies and manipulations that we are subject to as the information gateways), maybe it shouldn't allowed a platform.
He kept bringing up, a concept akin to the followers as if irrational, niave people who need to protected from these manipulators.
reply to post by Mandrakerealmz
reply to post by TheExopolitician
And im sure you've never downloaded a torrent.....
Originally posted by Mandrakerealmz
I was actually asking.
The New World Order threat is legit
Plus his post contains many facts.
Shooting the messenger much?
Originally posted by Arawn73
Not a big fan of David myself...but...his financial tyranny bombshell is latent with backed up facts...is it a surprise that character defamation comes his way now? We all know better....don't we?
2. Your presence in this group comprises a tacit acceptance of our core values and beliefs as set forth in Mr. Wilcock's work and the Law of One series from L/L Research Company. While skepticism and critical thinking are always useful in the pursuit of knowledge, we cannot have meaningful discussions if we must constantly defend our fundamentals against those who choose to disagree. If an individual cannot approach the material with an open mind and respectful demeanor, they will make others uncomfortable, and in turn may receive uncomfortable responses. Such skeptics will be unsubscribed from the group if their criticism hurts the community spirit of the group.