Evidence Of Advanced Technology Thousands Of Years Ago In Peru (Interesting)

reply to post by anon72


good stuff,
i am replying so i can check out the videos when i get home , damned network filters

reply to post by Harte


Having re read the info i first read months ago, it appears i may have embellished slightly!

However, the link is:

www.abc.net.au...

Rather than trawling nets per say, it shows evidence of deep sea fishing based on the bones of fish eaten there, up to a period of 42,000 years ago.

I have also just been reading that the oldest known cave art in South America has been found in Brazil and dated to around 10-12'000 years old. This would indicate human settlement from this sort of period. Apparently it was actually found in 2009 but the results have only just been published.


Link:

www.telegraph.co.uk... tml

reply to post by Flavian


It would appear the Telegraph linky isn't working. For anyone interested, it is on the Telegraph website today in the World News, South America section.

reply to post by Harte


Found this link, not that much info though:
www.dailymail.co.uk...

Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't Africa have the most abundant supply of diamonds known to man? I don't think it's a mystery that man known Africa has diamonds, the ancients knew as well. Egypt is on the African continent, so you could presume they had access to diamonds and made diamond hand saws from the crystals. All they would have to do have done was crushed the diamonds and lathe them with a glue and put them on ropes to cut the stones. It's the same process we use today.

our true history has been hidden and re-invented.
read: Sitchin and you can get an idea of what i feel truly happened back in the day.
not sure if the Ancient Aliens ever left - they seem to have taken on a herd the sheep type of role.
i have no doubt they are here, there and everywhere in the universe - probably have interstellar wars.
read 'the Terra papers' - could be where 'Star Wars' originated.

reply to post by Rocketman7


I always knew Star Trek was real.... BTW I have one really nagging question....


Why go through all this just to move some rocks? Think of Boeing spending 100s of billions to develop a plane that could carry giant monoliths, and then we start to build with them and use them for whatever with the technology we have today.

Now times this scenario by 1000 in ridiculousness of an alien race 1000 times more advance doing basically the same thing.....

Sometimes a person needs to ask why would they do such a stupid thing? Where man doing it with his primitive knowledge would be a great feat.

Originally posted by spaceg0at
i would also like to add that most of these megalithic structures are made of granite..

not softer stone like modern statues and art are made of.

edit on 22-2-2012 by spaceg0at because: (no reason given)

edit on 22-2-2012 by spaceg0at because: (no reason given)

I just had this brain flash, don't know how else to explain it. Like an instant download.

I get the distinct impression that gravity and magnetics are related and have something to do with corkscrew waves of energy emanating from the electrons of a substance and like intermeshed gears, as they spin, they draw objects together.

Somebody on ATS posted a link to a site called "Occult Chemistry" Together with an interview of Maurice Cotterell, author of Future Science and the fact that the builder of Coral Castle said under ground rivers were a critical element of ancient science, it all became clear.

What if, using magnets, the corkscrew waves of energy could be polarized and focused to achieve work? Two immediate applications would be the mitigation of gravity and the dissociation of molecular bonds in granite such that slabs of granite could be made virtually weightless and semi-fluid like gellatin?

That would explain monolithic construction using not very high tech tools. Does this make sense to anybody else?

A few more pictures of some advanced ancient stone cutting.

Originally posted by Marco0Aurelio

Now I'm not saying it was made from aliens, I am saying that there's conclusive evidence that history as it is taught is wrong and so is most likely, many fields of knowledge.

(btw there are many records of antropomorphic "gods", are they aliens? are they men that evolved before?

Isn't it fair to say that man assigned anything they didn't understand a God? Does this make all the Gods real? Do Gods make the wind blow? "Conclusive Evidence" would mean physical proof...I don't see it...To interpret drawing or carvings etc, or to interpret ancient text and assign meaning as one sees fit is all just an interpretation and not evidence of anything.

To look at something and not understand how it was done, does not also lead one down the path of lost arts of advance knowledge when basic fundamentals can accomplish the same thing.

We have no evidence of anything other than a few minorities of different interpretations.

Originally posted by JAY1980
A few more pictures of some advanced ancient stone cutting.






[img]http://media.photobucket.com/image/puma%20punku/Rocketraz1982/Figure-28_-Puma-Punku-Bolivia.jpg

Is "advance ancient" an Oxymoron? I agree advance for their time AND that skill was lost to future generations IN THAT AREA, but all still based on very basic understanding of stone working and physics that was used in many places throughout the world in ancient times.

reply to post by spaceg0at


Dear Spaceg0at,

I'm a believer in the possibility of lost technology. However, those videos and these two guys conversing between themselves are probably the most dire videos i've ever seen. I was bored to frickin death.

Topic: A++
Delivery: F

Sorry had to say it.

T

Originally posted by Rocketman7


Truth is stranger than fiction.

Modern archeology, likes to study civilization as if it was 13,000 years old, yet we have evidence of at least 2 million years of culture on earth, and then we have evidence such as this regarding the moon...

Ok I picked one thing out and I need you to disprove it as the paper said.

HYPOTHESIS I. The Moon was once a part of the Earth and broke away from it.

This has now been refuted by the evidence.

What evidence?

cutting with diamond laced ropes/cables seems most likely to me, despite what companys want to tell you diamonds are one of the more abundant gems out there so im sure they found plenty way back then. These ropes combined with simple machines and animal power could go a long way and explain how the big stones were cut, maybe the smaller ones too. It doesnt explain how the indents were cut at puma punku though. The holes in stone I could see just being chiseled.

some other ideas that popped in my head (although kind of far fetched) after seeing the single stone coffin looking things is maybe they found a way to melt the stone or at least make it soft enough to work with. Lower pressure (higher altitude) brings the melting point down, and adding water or other materials can bring the temperature down even farther. Or maybe they figured out or found some type of strong acid to use. Im sure they experimented a lot out of boredom (or found it by accident) since they didnt have video games like we do now.

so those coffins seem to be a rough size of some of the small blocks and usually with grooves in the top for what looks like you could set a piece of wood on, maybe they did whatever they did to get the stone workable or in a cement like state, then had it set in the molds with the wood in place so they could pick it up and remove it once it solidified a little bit then put the finishing touches on it before it hardened again.


Im bored so those are my random thoughts

Originally posted by Rocketman7

So to answer your question then, are we animals or are we aliens or are we gods etc,
what do you think?
Are we just star dust? Are we just monkeys typing Shakespeare or are we in fact more than just that? Are we something far more, than just that?

If we are just animals that evolved from monkeys, what the heck is all of that for then? And why is it there and who put it there and why do they look like us? Because that is us. We are those type of people, and we are just here doing whatever, and can't remember who we really are.
Right now as we are, some of us have some talent and can sing and dance, but we don't have God-like powers, so we are not Gods, and we live here so we aren't aliens, but with a moonship like a death star, if it were under command like it once was, we coudda been a some body.But since we are software, and our soul exists in a matrix like computer system, we have some comfort in our immortality.

Once again you are interpreting things the way you want to, that is all...

And to answer your question, yes we are of earth and here is why. We are related to everything, even grass and trees. As we follow the branches back in time on the tree of evolution the amount of like DNA gets less and less, but there is still like DNA in everything, with very a few exceptions, and we are not one of them. As example: Most creatures have two eyes of some kind and that just tells us that the two eye concept started very early in earths evolution, but this would be a crap shoot to be like that on another planet as it was here on earth in the distant past.

This also means that what we are, life on this planet, started with using very unique earth like materials. We could not have lived in the early times of life here for there was no oxygen until early life created it as waste byproduct. The fact that we need iron and lead is a poison mean that iron is abundant and lead is not, but all the chemicals and metals etc that make us who we are is a very earth unique formula. Even our atmosphere is special to us to meet our needs. We have no special Alien DNA....

Originally posted by plube

think outside the box and you could go onto things like lazer tooling ....possible plasma type cutters.....ionic beam cutting.....high pressure glass blasting....or we even go to the possibility of proton separation....molecular disassemblance.....or atomic realignment technologies....

Or think inside the box of what they did have back then that would work, like simple saws using sand as a grinder and a lot of time. There is also talk of them using parabolic mirror bowls to melt and cut stone with the sun, AND more importantly they have physical proof of these bowls in the museums.

If is funny how many will ascribe what can not be definitively answered to aliens.

More have faith in aliens then God whose name is Jesus. Both of which can not be seen yet one can be known through the words in the Bible.

The Bible clearly tells us that man was advanced before the flood.

And it would be easy to conclude that that info was carried over by Noah and his sons.

After the tower of Babel knowledge was split up and spread across the world. And as we are today so then knowledge is lost and gained many times over.

Originally posted by anon72
reply to post by Segador

 

Please. No slaves in this. It just wasn't/isn't feasiable. To house, feed and care for (in some type of manner) so many would just re-write what we have been taught.

The logistics behind that many people is amazing. Any year after year after year. No, I believe they people who built them-wanted to do so. But they didn't do it by the way we have been lead to believe-Not the GIZA ones.

It has been estimated that 2000 workers could build the pyramids using primitive methods...So you don't need a lot of people, just a good amount of time.

Once again we are talking about basic stone working, and to assume they needed super advance technology to do this is ridiculous. Why? Would be the big question, when if they had all this advance knowledge they would have moved totally away from stone working.

reply to post by Xtrozero


And like i said earlier, there is plenty of evidence of cutting tools made from Diorite and Obsidian. These would have no problem going through the toughest of granites.

All in all there are actually several methods of achieving these sorts of cuts on hard rock.

As to the whether or not slaves could build the pyramids, well according to the Egyptians they both did and could.

Originally posted by sitchin
not so unbelievable to think they have been civilizations in the distant passed that were advanced in anti gravity technology knowledge of advance lasers.. seems very logical if you think how old the earth actually is ..

But once again, why use all this advance technology just to dumb it down by using it to work stone when primitive principles can and did work well. AND this was a culture that was very primitive in many other ways...well except for their lasers.