It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by eNumbra
They contribute the most towards the total tax income of the country because they make the most money. They could pay the least in respect to their income and still contribute more than the rest.
Originally posted by GeorgiaGirl
It is not. 99% of all income is most definitely NOT *earned* by 1% of the population. Propaganda.
YOU are the one who is not well informed. Actually, you have been well informed, but by people who are spreading crappy data. Sounds like info straight from Occupy Wall Street.
I wish I could imbed a chart. Go to www.taxfoundation.org... and scroll down until you get to Table 1. The data is from 2009, but that year, the top 1% paid an effective tax rate of 24% of their income which is the HIGHEST RATE PERCENTAGE-WISE OF ANY INCOME GROUP. Their share of the country's adjusted gross income (AGI) was 16.9%, FAR from the 99% you claim it is.
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by Skyfloating
Define "good".
If I believe each of my two children studied as best they could focus, and applied their skills well, screw the number.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by Laokin
Punctuation. Periods. Commas.
off topic
Also, you spew baseless statements that are unintelligible and not true.
Personal observations about posters are still of ftopic
The government garnishes the wages of people and straight up steals it's revenue. It's not generated, it's taken.
No kidding as per the thread topic which means 10% of people are getting more taken from them than anyone else.''
The individual wages of the many don't alter the amount of revenue taken by the government, since the government takes it's revenue from everybody.
Straight up lie since the thread op and other sources cite that one group of people get more taken and 50% of Americans have no tax liabilities whatsoever.
If the super rich made less, others would make more... the amount taken by the government would always be the same.
That is laughable
Don't be silly, use your brain.
Appartently people who do not believe in robbing from peter to pay paul aren't using their brain still a personal observation that is still not relevant to the topic being discussing.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by Skyfloating
Define "good".
If I believe each of my two children studied as best they could focus, and applied their skills well, screw the number.
Do you not believe in rewarding performance or achievement?
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by Skyfloating
Define "good".
If I believe each of my two children studied as best they could focus, and applied their skills well, screw the number.
Do you not believe in rewarding performance or achievement?
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by Laokin
Still don't get it you can't take from someone who has nothing here.
That is the reason why there are trillions sitting offshore and trillions will continue to move and stay offshore because people seem to think they are entitled to other peoples cash.
When that buffer zone the evil rich is gone who are they going to come for next?
Originally posted by unityemissions
I'm sorry, but is english your first language?
Originally posted by Laokin
Originally posted by trust_no_one
so they're paying 71% of federal income tax revenues but i bet they are receiving more than 71% of total income.
sorry in a hurry wasnt able to check if this has been brought up already
Right. Absolutely correct, as has been covered by me and a few other posters in here.
Originally posted by andersensrm
Yea but your missing out on the loophole. People who have tons of money, invest that money, the money they make on the investment is not considered income and therefore it isn't taxed. Statistics are a tricky thing, and having just one, or without explaining how you got to them, or giving all the data, thet can be incredibly misleading.
Originally posted by Laokin
Money is Finite.
Originally posted by GeorgiaGirl
Originally posted by Laokin
Originally posted by trust_no_one
so they're paying 71% of federal income tax revenues but i bet they are receiving more than 71% of total income.
sorry in a hurry wasnt able to check if this has been brought up already
Right. Absolutely correct, as has been covered by me and a few other posters in here.
You've brought it up, but it is WRONG. Absolutely wrong. They are most DEFINITELY NOT receiving more than 71% of total income.
In 2009, if we're talking about the top 1%: their share of the country's adjusted gross income (AGI) was 16.9%, and they paid an effective tax rate of 24% of their income which is the HIGHEST RATE PERCENTAGE-WISE OF ANY INCOME GROUP. www.taxfoundation.org... Go down to Table 1 and take a look.
So you can cover it over and over, but you will be wrong every time.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by unityemissions
I'm sorry, but is english your first language?
You said "treats for all"...but suppose one of the children does not put in the effort. Would it still be treats for all?
I`ll ignore your incessant ad-hominem temper tantrums
Originally posted by Laokin
.If it's not a lack of understanding in math, then there was a clear agenda with this thread which means you know exactly what you did.
So I'm going to presume you've made a naive mistake, rather than to jump to the conclusion that this thread is part of a conspiracy itself.
However, it can only be one or the other. There is no third option.