It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by Kali74
Great screen grab. On the top it says
"The Top 10 percent of income earners paid 71% of federal Income Tax."
The truth shall set you free.
The rich are making lots of money and they are paying their - fair share - in taxes.
What are you nitpicking about?
----------
If you think that headline is bogus, go tell Media Matters. They might offer
you a job. This could be your first big scoop!
- A scandal was discovered on the ATS messageboard today.-
Why are you defending the rich???
As opposed to defending the middle class or the poor???
This is important. The rich are the capitalists.
They start up companies and grow the economy.
Growing the economy is a good thing.
We want the private sector to grow the economy not the government.
-----
It comes down to a simple question.
Are you a capitalist or an anticapitalist?
Think long. Think hard. Make your choice.
How about the people who spend their money with the company, which is where the money
comes from in the first place?
Are you anti capitalist?
How are companies going to survive if people do not have money to spend with the companies?
Think long. Think hard. Make your choice.
Use General Electric as an example.
How are companies going to survive if people do not have money to spend with GE?
What does that mean?
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by Eurisko2012
They get Corporate Welfare, they'll be just fine.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by Laokin
Are you for or against the super rich?
Cuz I'm against them.
Im not "against" anybody, including the poor and rich. Live and let live.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by Kali74
I understand that this is confusing but if no one can directly refute this info
The top 10% earned 45.77% of the income, but paid 69.94% of all income taxes.
then it's clear that as a whole the top 10% pay a disproportionately high amount of the total income tax collected.
Equals about $577,329,590 from the 5% to the 28% tax rates (minus capital gains, I added those to the 28% and up) and about $483,086,092 from the 28% and up group (including all Capital Gains).
Originally posted by ideasarebulletproof
reply to post by peck420
When I say "Uber-rich" I mean the ones that own this country and benefit from how it currently is run. Not the 2 - 10%, the 1 - .01%.
Originally posted by sirhumperdink
reply to post by Eurisko2012
just a question
i dont mean to be insulting im honestly just curious
do you view this as a game and you really just enjoy arguing positions that are incredibly disadvantageous so you can bask in the glory of what you think of as a win in an incredibly handicapped position thus proving your superiority?
again not trying to insult or insinuate this is the case if it isnt i would just really like to knowedit on 23-2-2012 by sirhumperdink because: (no reason given)edit on 23-2-2012 by sirhumperdink because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by peck420
Originally posted by ideasarebulletproof
reply to post by peck420
When I say "Uber-rich" I mean the ones that own this country and benefit from how it currently is run. Not the 2 - 10%, the 1 - .01%.
I know exactly who you were referring too.
The problem is that there is only around $9.759 Trillion dollars in circulation.
Debt is $15 Trillion + at current (and $117 Trillion + unfunded).
The US Government would have to start liquidating citizens assets to cover all of the debt. And, the 'uber-rich' don't have enough assets inside the US to cover the shortfall.
Not to mention that all of the liquidation would have to be to foreigners (or at least in foreign funds).
The path that the Government is on will lead to a wholesale of the US...and may not cover all obligations. There is NO way to tax yourself out of this, there must be expenditure cuts involved.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by ErtaiNaGia
I have always thought that rich people pay more tax per dollar.
Poor people pay more tax if you base if you base it on percentage.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
This is turning into a constructive thread.
There must be expenditure cuts. Okay where?
Originally posted by sirhumperdink
reply to post by Eurisko2012
ok so youre one of those types
im sorry we both wasted our time
i wish you the best of luck in the coming months
Originally posted by sirhumperdink
reply to post by Eurisko2012
good deal (everybody can agree on that)
one last question though
what do you think of that corporate income tax amounting to less than 300billion?edit on 23-2-2012 by sirhumperdink because: (no reason given)edit on 23-2-2012 by sirhumperdink because: (no reason given)