It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And like i previously said, NASA could have airbrushed the anomalies out
Originally posted by gortex
I think your just arguing for the sake of arguing now , you already conceded earlier in the thread that that was not the case and there was no evidence of NASA airbrushing the original .
This thread is over , done and dusted , just accept it and move on
Originally posted by reaxi0n
Since the picture was taken in 1967, and it is the EXACT same image, no, it was not "airbrushed out," it was added in.
You are just trying to argue because you have been proven wrong
Originally posted by m0rphine
Give it up 'Anunaki' you lost on page 3.
Originally posted by Anunaki10
The chances of NASA's own Orbiter flying the excact same line as China's own orbiter is very small, so no, NASA's own orbiter could not have taken the excact same image.
You missed something on Page 32 www.abovetopsecret.com... 'reaxi0n', did you just manipulated Chang'e 2 Orbiter's image, to make it look like nothing is there? Or was it your parents who showed you how to manipulate it?
I noticed there is a triangular shaped "dark shadow" spot on the right area of your provided socalled manipulated "nothing is there" image, and that "Artist" who made that triangular shaped "dark shadow" did a very bad job, because it does not look like a real shadow spot at all, and that's unfortunately very disappointing 'reaxi0n', because it looks like a very untrained "Artist" who painted that triangular shaped "dark shadow" (what is supposed to be a shadow, HHHHA-HA-HA how ridiculous!) with a pen-tool used for Cartoon drawings. And you what? I think that the one who made that triangular shaped dark spot (that is SUPPOSED to look like a shadow) is a VERY untrained amateur Cartoon drawer!!!
Another thing, that manipulated "nothing is there" image seems to be the excact same photo as allegedly taken by Chang'e 2 Orbiter. You don't really think that NASA's own Orbiter was flying just behind Chang'e 2 Orbither to take the excact same photo, right? I tell you what, NASA's own orbiter did NOT fly just behind Chang'e 2 Orbiter.
So either you manipulated with Chang'e 2 Orbiter's image to make it look like nothing is there, or your parents showed you how to manipulate it to make it look like nothing is there.
Originally posted by reaxi0n
DUH? That's why it's not a freaking Chinese image! Jesus what is so hard for you to understand, seriously?!
HERE IS THE LUNAR ORBITER III IMAGE GALLERY.
www.lpi.usra.edu...
It's image 3085. Scroll down and you will see it. It was taken in 1967!
Seriously what is so hard for you to comprehend here?
Originally posted by reaxi0n
YES IT IS www.lpi.usra.edu...
Originally posted by blackmirage0311
[how does it feel being mentally #ing retarded?
Originally posted by m0rphine
It really is crazy how #ing stupid you are. Can't even spell your own username right.
Originally posted by Anunaki10
Tsk tsk tsk, is this childish bs of yours really the best you can do? The reason i chose "Anunaki10" was that at the time i was about to join is that "Anunaki" was already occupied by another ATS member, so was "Anunaki1" and so on, so when i finally suggested to use "Anunaki10" then that suggestion was free to use, so i said >Okay, why not just use "Anunaki10" then?
Originally posted by m0rphine
Originally posted by reaxi0n
Whatever makes you feel better. I'm out of here