It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For example 'm0rphine' and 'ProdBird' were not able to prove their points, they failed in their attempt to discredit the alleged asronaut's film footage, they also failed in their attempt to discredit this 'Alien Moon Base Captured By Chang'e-2 Orbiter 2012 thread'.
Originally posted by m0rphine
Yes I do, and so do other people in this thread, which is why you keep ignoring the facts that they give you.
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
Please forgive me for this but STOP as you are only showing that you have no clue what you are talking about and this thread has been shown by enough other members and the OP to be a hoax,so in all actuality you are the one who has failed,miserably I might add.. Sorry the truth hurts...
Originally posted by Anunaki10
Your bs is a sad sight, *sigh*. Do you know what your problem is? You refuse to realize that your attempt to discredit these cases are pointless. You will NEVER EVER be able to get me to listen to facts, no matter how hard you try, and there is NOTHING you can do about that.
Originally posted by Anunaki10
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
Please forgive me for this but STOP as you are only showing that you have no clue what you are talking about and this thread has been shown by enough other members and the OP to be a hoax,so in all actuality you are the one who has failed,miserably I might add.. Sorry the truth hurts...
This case have not been proven as hoax.
Originally posted by m0rphine
I know about the Chang'e 2....everyone here knows about the Chang'e 2. What are you trying to prove by showing the wikipedia page? That you can not realize it was launched in 2010 and not 1967 like the photograph is from?
Originally posted by Anunaki10
Originally posted by m0rphine
I know about the Chang'e 2....everyone here knows about the Chang'e 2. What are you trying to prove by showing the wikipedia page? That you can not realize it was launched in 2010 and not 1967 like the photograph is from?
It was launched in 2010, yes, and another thing... Informations show CHINESE CHANG’E 2 ORBITER FOUND ALIEN BASE ON THE BACK SIDE OF THE MOON 2/17/2012edit on 22-2-2012 by Anunaki10 because: (no reason given)
Uploaded by StephenHannardADGUK on Feb 14, 2012
Originally posted by m0rphine
Just because you choose to ignore the proof, does not mean it hasn't been proven. That is why you are the only person in this 20 page thread still defending it, because most people here have a sense of logic and understand the difference between reality and proven hoax.
Originally posted by Anunaki10
You're lying again... I never said i ignore proof, your LIAR.
Most people here have, unlike you, sense of logic and understand the difference between reality and what is not reality, and no, this case is NOT proven as hoax.
This case have not been proven as hoax.
Originally posted by m0rphine
Originally posted by Anunaki10
Originally posted by m0rphine
I know about the Chang'e 2....everyone here knows about the Chang'e 2. What are you trying to prove by showing the wikipedia page? That you can not realize it was launched in 2010 and not 1967 like the photograph is from?
It was launched in 2010, yes, and another thing... Informations show CHINESE CHANG’E 2 ORBITER FOUND ALIEN BASE ON THE BACK SIDE OF THE MOON 2/17/2012edit on 22-2-2012 by Anunaki10 because: (no reason given)
Another funny thing that proves this lie....your link says 2/17/2012, yet the youtube video that is in the OP was posted on the 14th.
Another funny thing that proves this lie....your link says 2/17/2012, yet the youtube video that is in the OP was posted on the 14th.
Don't you know what that means? It means the photo was allegedly taken by Chang'e 2 Orbiter 17 february 2012
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
Ouch!!! that has to hurt.... An ego that is...
Originally posted by Illustronic
Originally posted by sapien82
Well anyone would think that there arent bases on the moon , however maybe it was just coincidence but last year
Nasa on Astronomy picture of the day , posted a picture of the moon from the LRO , the following day they posted a picture of earths largest strip mining machine .
I immediately thought that someone was having a laugh at us and were sneakily hinting to us that we are already strip mining the moon using these giant machines that can strip the length of a football pitch in under an hour .
Its on APOD and is still there , I linked it before in a previous ATS thread and its just either total coincidence or a someone hinting at the truth .
WOW, just WOW...
The Big Muskie is a model 4250-W Bucyrus-Erie dragline digger, with a 220 cubic yard bucket, it weighs 27 million pounds!
Height: 222 ft., 6 in.
Length of the boom: 310 feet
Length of machine with boom down: 487 ft., 6 in.
Empty bucket weight: 230 tons
Width: 151 ft., 6 in., compare to an 8 lane highway!
Cable diameter: 5 in
Electrically powered: 13,800 volts
Mobility: hydraulically driven walking feet
The largest spacecraft payload (not counting the upper stage rocket and fuel) ever to have reached earth escape velocity are the Apollo 15-17 weighing in at 103,570 pounds, 260th the mass of the digger, and very much smaller.
Explain to us how on earth an excavator was ever launched to earth escape velocity, and for now we will ignore how it was every able to safely land on the moon and operate.
This thread just keeps getting more out there by the page...
Originally posted by Anunaki10
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
Ouch!!! that has to hurt.... An ego that is...
Yeah, you're absolutely right, 'm0rphine' obviously misunderstood something here!
Yeah, you're absolutely right, 'm0rphine' obviously misunderstood something here!
Originally posted by m0rphine
What exactly did I misunderstand? Your link says it was taken 2/17/2012, but the video on youtube was uploaded on 2/14/2012, so it would have been taken before 2/14. This shows your link is a lie. Are you that stupid? At least be humble enough to admit when you are wrong.