It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by theBigToe
Am I the only one that LMFAO when I watched this video?
Ron Pauls a hippie and a fascist appeaser.
May as well start grabbing your ankles if he was ever elected into the White House.
Good thing he wont win.
Obama 2012.
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
Originally posted by theBigToe
Am I the only one that LMFAO when I watched this video?
Ron Pauls a hippie and a fascist appeaser.
May as well start grabbing your ankles if he was ever elected into the White House.
Good thing he wont win.
Obama 2012.
May I make a suggestion? Spend a little less time with the MSM and a little more time doing some real research. Think for yourself, deny ignorance my friend.
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
Originally posted by theBigToe
Am I the only one that LMFAO when I watched this video?
Ron Pauls a hippie and a fascist appeaser.
May as well start grabbing your ankles if he was ever elected into the White House.
Good thing he wont win.
Obama 2012.
May I make a suggestion? Spend a little less time with the MSM and a little more time doing some real research. Think for yourself, deny ignorance my friend.
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by theBigToe
Learning to think for yourself is exactly that... thinking for yourself. The internet is an amazing tool. This site is an amazing tool. Learn to look for multiple sources and read more for starters. Don't just take what people tell you at face value. Often times you can follow a money trail, or a paper trail. Pick a topic that interests you and go and research it. Use multiple sources and really dig for the bias behind each. Eventually you will awake from your MSM induced stupor. It requires work and commitment on your part, but most of all an open mind.
Let me ask you a few questions. What gives the MSM so much credibility in your mind? Really think about that please. Who pays for the MSM to exist? Really think about that too. If you find yourself running in complete lockstep with any politician or news source I can guarantee you that you are not yet able to think for yourself.
I do not 100% agree with Dr. Paul, however I find him to be the most truthful and consistent of all the politicians. I like that he attacks ideas and not individuals.
Becoming awake and aware is a goal very much worth pursuing.
Originally posted by Mimir
New good video about liberty and Ron Paul "the Thomas Jefferson of our day", at the end of the clip at 2m18sek you get the following question:
Journalist: "Dr. Paul who do you concider as your runningmate for presidency?"
Ron Paul: "The name Judge Napolitano jumps right into my head"
I think this is a very good choice for you'r next vice president, to me it looks like the judge is sincere in he's protection of the constitution. With he's background as a legal judge he would be a great asset for Paul in pointing out where the rules are broken and what could be done.
edit on 19-2-2012 by Mimir because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
Your dismissive attitude towards all sources outside of the MSM shows black and white thinking. Not especially indicative of an individual who is open minded and aware.
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by theBigToe
Let's assume that there is a person or two on this thread who is dismissive of individuals and uses name calling to deal with opponents. Each Ron Paul supporter is an Ambassador for Dr. Paul. Is it turning out that his supporters are driving away the voters needed to elect him?
Does Napolitano fall into a similar style of name calling, or is he seen as a warmer figure, welcoming undecided voters? That might be a huge plus to the Paul ticket.
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by theBigToe
Did you think I was supporting Paul's foreign policy? That wasn't the point of my post. Many people have expresssed concern about his non-interventionism, and I haven't seen those concerns put to rest.
My understanding of the objections to his policy are basically "If you're going to be the world's policeman, then you're going to have to walk the beat, and if there's no policeman, prepare for a lot of gunfights."
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by theBigToe
I will let Ron Paul himself address this: