It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheCommentator
No not really but I am intrested in hearing peoples opinions as to gain an understanding why people support such things.
Well no one, but I have a basis for my beliefs and its fairly ignorant to say that the US has actually helped most places because while they help a minority billions suffer.
The countries you speak of are often under the control of the US by installed dictators or suffering famine and poverty from the corrupt monetary system that the US forces them to follow.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by TheCommentator
You are asking the wrong question.
World, why should we, the US taxpayer, continue to support you?
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by TheCommentator
You are asking the wrong question.
World, why should we, the US taxpayer, continue to support you?
That’s why I asked the question as I just stated in my last post to you.
Everyone has a basis for their beliefs - otherwise they wouldn't have them!
As I have already explained this is a rigged system. In a scaled comparison the amount the US gives is no more than most other nations give.
Isn't it equally as ignorant to completely overlook the significant amounts of money they donate - irrespective or motives - that does end up buying medicine, shelter, food. A tangible result you cannot dispute.
Once again my point is that the US is enforcing the monetary system and corrupt governments that cause these problems, they could easily fix a lot of it out by not doing this.
Billions suffer - I presume you mean generally, as you couldn't possibly blame America for the suffering of billions. Well, its hardly fair to expect one country to sort everything out - what about China - the amount of people in that country (with its PROVEN record of civil rights issues and its strict, anti-libertarian agenda) suffering would be hundreds of millions at least. Ditto Russia, India, Brazil...
They support us by screwing us upright against a wall.
Originally posted by Jace26
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by TheCommentator
You are asking the wrong question.
World, why should we, the US taxpayer, continue to support you?
How does the US taxpayer support Australians?
We have to pay for Obama's visit.
We have pay for the bases Americans are operating here.
We have to pay for your endless wars then cleanup after you leave.
And we have to pay for the enemies you make.
What do we get out of it?
By looking.
In less than three weeks you have 406 posts and have started 16 threads. From killing cats to objects on the surface of Mars. How on earth do you find time for that?
Stoking emotional flames? So its wrong to talk about these things because people will get upset. I’m sorry but if your major concern is Americans getting upset that they cant face the facts of their murderous government then you really need to set some priorities.
However, on this one (granted it's in General Chit Chat) other than stoking emotional flames, I am not sure where you are going with it.
I didn’t say they were the cause of all these things, but being the enforcer of our monetary system they do make a lot of it possible. Remember that particularly in ww2 the same people that funded the allies funded the enemies.
1. "For the last century the US has been at the heart of worldwide...disregard for human rights..." So the US is the prime mover behind Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, the genocide in Rwanda, etc? Where are the facts to support this hypothesis?
The US is asking for support when they ask other nations to be involved with/help them with their foreign policies by giving up our young soldiers to die.
2. "Why should the world support US foreign policy?" Who is asking for the support? What constitutes support? I am not sure the US asked anybody nor does any country for that matter give a damn about any other country when it feels its self interests are at stake.
Millions as in millions yes. Slaughtering like present, past and future.
3. "Why should the world allow the US to continue...slaughtering millions of innocent people?" Millions? As in death camp volume? Slaughter-ING, like present tense? Really? Outside of the original expansion on the North American continent which few argue was a stellar episode in US foreign policy, please demonstrate some proof.
I know man, the US and UK have used our soldiers like worthless pawns for way to long. It’s disgusting the way they treat us and the admiration a lot of Australians still have for them.
Originally posted by Jace26
reply to post by TheCommentator
Its true though, America is a burden on Australia. Our young men and women are fighting in their wars, and get the cold shoulder for it.
I wonder how many Americans know today is the 70th anniversary of the Bombing of Darwin?
Originally posted by TheCommentator
This thread is strictly about foreign policy, but of course you will all stray from that; but maybe because I said that you won’t, so who knows.
So,
Why should the world support US foreign policy?
Please don’t tell me because you give money to charity because we all know that is a bunk system that doesn’t help, especially when the US is enforcing the monetary system that puts people in poverty in the first place.
For the last century the US has been at the heart of worldwide corruption, death, destruction, war, famine and complete disregard for human rights and the environment in particular.
It would appear that the US has not really done anything good of significance, and if they have it more than likely had an ulterior motive.
Why should the world allow the US to continue breaking human rights laws and slaughtering millions of innocent people?
Grow up, is that really the best you got. We all know its true even if we dont care to admit it
Surprise, another anti-American rant on ATS. Do you have any sources for any of these claims against America? Or are we just throwing facts to the wind and discussing your opinion.
It would be a lot higher then 350, Aboriginals were not counted back then so the death toll would be mostly white people.
Originally posted by Jace26
reply to post by TheCommentator
Many historians believe the actual death toll was much higher than 350, some even say it was over 1,500+. Only recently, it was discovered that the largest American mutiny in history happened in Australia in 1942, and has been covered up until recently.
But, I think most Autralians know the importance of the bombings, it changed so much about Australia and literally was the final event of Australia looking at itself in the Empire. To which Australia then looked toward America (big mistake).
If America can survive the next couple of decades I will be very surprised. And yeah we all know they would leave us to perish in a heartbeat.
Originally posted by Jace26
reply to post by TheCommentator
Thats exactly what I think, America is a sinking ship. But lets face it, in the event of an invasion America wasn't going to come to our aid anyway.
We need to become allies with China and other South East Asian countries, thats where our future will be.
The International community should not support anything that our government wants to do unless it is something our citizens are actually backing. Many people around the world don't realize that many citizens of the U.S. don't support much of what is being carried out in 'our' name. The American people are never asked "hey, people, do you want this?'
Originally posted by TheCommentator
reply to post by Sharpenmycleats
Grow up, is that really the best you got. We all know its true even if we dont care to admit it
Surprise, another anti-American rant on ATS. Do you have any sources for any of these claims against America? Or are we just throwing facts to the wind and discussing your opinion.