It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There are two Crowns operant in England, one being Queen Elizabeth II. Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament. This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state known as The City of London, or simply 'The City.'
The City is not a part of England, just as Washington is not a part of the USA. The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually. When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor. Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms.
By kowtowing to a corrupt government. Barry? is that you?
Originally posted by Demoncreeper
This gesture could help restore faith in the actual message of religion. If one was religious. Or at least show that they stood for what they preached. I dunno.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
By kowtowing to a corrupt government. Barry? is that you?
Originally posted by Demoncreeper
This gesture could help restore faith in the actual message of religion. If one was religious. Or at least show that they stood for what they preached. I dunno.
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
reply to post by goldcoin
Thats a good point.
Lets hope the UK does the same to the 'Crown City of London" or maybe Washington.
There are two Crowns operant in England, one being Queen Elizabeth II. Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament. This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state known as The City of London, or simply 'The City.'
The City is not a part of England, just as Washington is not a part of the USA. The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually. When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor. Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms.
There are far to many tax exempt billionaire businesses in this world today.
Vatican City issues its own coins. It has used the euro as its currency since 1 January 1999, owing to a special agreement with the European Union (council decision 1999/98/CE). Euro coins and notes were introduced in 1 January 2002—the Vatican does not issue euro banknotes. Issuance of euro-denominated coins is strictly limited by treaty, though somewhat more than usual is allowed in a year in which there is a change in the papacy.[49] Because of their rarity, Vatican euro coins are highly sought by collectors.[50] Until the adoption of the Euro, Vatican coinage and stamps were denominated in their own Vatican lira currency, which was on par with the Italian lira.
Originally posted by kn0wh0w
the estimated savings are ranging from 600 million to 2.2 billion euros, ANUALLY!
some are calling this a victory for public pressure.
insiders in the vatican say there's a war raging within the vatican.
'things are falling apart'
well i for one am glad these things are starting to fall apart.
but what do you think about the topic at hand?
should the vatican be required to pay taxes?
i think they should.
www.independent.co.uk< br /> (visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by goldcoin
Why would the Vatican pay taxes to Italy? They're independent of Italy. It would be like asking Canada to pay taxes to the US.
City of London
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not to be confused with London.
Often called The Square Mile, the City is a geographically defined area of the London metropolis. The City is not a London borough, and unbeknownst to almost everybody outside the UK (and to most British people) it has its own distinctive political representative body, the City of London Corporation, which in addition to holding some rather unusual powers - such as the power to organise its own police force - is probably the most powerful and self-interested political lobby in the world.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
No they should not. Religious institutions should be free from the state. They should not be subject to the state. It is especially egregious in the case of the Vatican since they are an independent "nation" and they could theoretically classify their churches as consulates or some such.
Originally posted by milkyway12
reply to post by My.mind.is.mine
Then Orphan children rely on charity. Not tax money. Not sure what makes "Orphan" children any better than the man down the street. The needy are needy. No life is any more important than another.
Again how come "Orphan" children need my money more than some one else? It is called nature. Trying to solve every single problem of every person is foolish and will drag you down too.