It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The 2012 GOP Primary: Unmasking the Vote Manipulation Upon reviewing the Greenville County Precinct election vote data from the 2012, a disturbing pattern arose: Ron Paul averaged 24% in precincts where less than 250 people voted; he averaged less than 12 percent in precincts with more than 800. A spreadsheet was created to help me understand how this could be. Why was Ron Paul’s percentage in large precincts half of that in small precincts?
Conclusion The final results of the GOP Primaries and Caucuses are pre-determined and are created through vote tabulation manipulation. Having worked with various programmers through the years in creating algorithms, I find the particular one laid out in this document to be quite primitive and laughably obvious. Having analyzed the New Hampshire and South Carolina Primary Counties like this one, I am shocked that the perpetrators haven’t spent more resources to make the end result more believable. If we don’t expose this nonsense right now and convince all candidates’ supporters to fight this vote manipulation in unison, regardless of one’s candidate’s name, we may never have another national election in the US where “we the people” decide the outcome.
Originally posted by Q:1984A:1776
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
More made up facts and numbers. All the graphs have clear errors which I don't even have to point out.
More unfounded accusations by a shill who will likely be banned here shortly for disinformation and outright lies.
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
Originally posted by Q:1984A:1776
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
More made up facts and numbers. All the graphs have clear errors which I don't even have to point out.
More unfounded accusations by a shill who will likely be banned here shortly for disinformation and outright lies.
Accused of dis-information purely because I don't agree with Ron Paul. Amazing.
When I get some more time I'll check the actual methodology to see if what the author is doing even makes sense.