It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
link
America, the greatest losses to our freedom have come, not from someone attacking us, but from the government ignoring the Constitution and the majority letting them get away with it.
The worst Amendments to the Constitution were not those ratified by the States, but rather were Amendments by consensus where all three branches of government agreed to look the other way.
When good people do nothing, bad things happen.
…
We should make the government afraid of us. Afraid of us. Because as Jefferson reminded us, “When the people fear the government there is tyranny, but when the government fears the people there is liberty.”
Originally posted by AmericanPitBull
Truer words were never spoken than those you quote from Jefferson. You and I have butted heads over the using of old nazi symbolism by US forces. To me a simple difference of view No big deal. however in this you touch my fundamental core that is an American. If I come off as "hating" LE or being harshly critical of certain military policy it is not because I fundamentally hate them it is because they represent a government that does not fear the populace. I am not here to ague details but rather to show my absolute agreement with your post and it's message.
I also wish to demonstrate that despite heated differences on execution of policies and law, at the level at which the "rubber meets the road" a lot of us are on the same page.
APB
ETA S&F on this messageedit on 16-2-2012 by AmericanPitBull because: (no reason given)
Why would they fear us they won't even see it coming( stealthy)...if they can kill people and make it look like "accidents", then maybe its about time some of these corrupt gov people have "accidents"
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by ElOmen
Why would they fear us they won't even see it coming( stealthy)...if they can kill people and make it look like "accidents", then maybe its about time some of these corrupt gov people have "accidents"
The good judge wasn’t advocating anything like that. All champions of the constitution understand that the fundamental reason for the 2nd amendment is to keep the balance of power in the hands of “WE THE PEOPLE”.
Fear is a good thing…if one is fearful of you the chance of that person attacking you is virtually negated.
Originally posted by theBigToe
Well, I dont enjoy seeing my rights violated but lets be realistic...
A revolution, even a well armed militia like the one we have thanks to our 2nd amendment, isnt going to do anything against a modern military, especially the worlds most powerful military. Its legal to peacefully protest, but that doesnt ensure a change, and once you break the law, authorities have the right to apprehend you for doing so (like with the OWS protesters. Some were invading private properties and others were setting up residence in public areas, some were doing drugs, etc.)
And in any event, we still have the right to debate and say what we want, which is a right worth more then any other right, and regardless of what we think and what laws have been passed, the government still protects that right or they would have rounded up everybody that has been saying things like this and throw them in jail/deport them/or kill them. Have instances of unjust behavior occurred? Yes. But that does not mean its the social norm.
Casey Anthony beats the system, sometimes the system beats you.
You and I have butted heads over the using of old nazi symbolism by US forces.
I also wish to demonstrate that despite heated differences on execution of policies and law, at the level at which the "rubber meets the road" a lot of us are on the same page.
I think the military has outgrown any need to fear mere rifles though.
I think the 2nd amendment is really now only useful in that if we are invaded by a foreign power, we can fight as a militia with our military. But if a militia went up against a modern military wed get slaughtered. It would be the situation in Syria x1000, id presume.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government" -- Thomas Jefferson
"One of the ordinary modes, by which tyrants accomplish their purposes without resistance, is, by disarming the people, and making it an offense to keep arms." -- Constitutional scholar Joseph Story, 1840
The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them." -- Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story of the John Marshall Court
link
& what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time that his people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. -- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Col. William S. Smith, 1787
Hey Op, you stated: We Should Make the Government Fear Us.
That has already been done, and with great success.
You can convince yourself by taking a good look at all the recent Laws and rulings they passed.
All designed to to lower their level of fear.
Originally posted by seabag
Hi, you stated:
1) Could a country of 300,000,000+ (with at least as many firearms) defend against a military force of under 3 million?? It’s possible considering many military members would not turn their weapons against their family and neighbors.
I cant believe most of you don't realize that the Government already fears us. If they had no fear, they wouldn't feel the need to try and pass laws to restrain our ability to protest against them and make the changes that the citizens feel need to be made.