It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The real midichlorians: A case for Pleomorphism

page: 1
15
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 06:32 PM
link   
Germ theory is the basis of all modern medicine. All medical endeavors are based on the idea that germs cause disease therefore in an attempt to stop disease, the germs must be killed. This is what is taught in every textbook, and to most people it's generally accepted as fact, however that does not make it true and there are some scientists that do not agree with germ theory. Let's take an in-depth look at the other side of the coin, pleomorphism, but first I'd like to start off with a couple quotes about the scientific community and medical fields.



“I think the critical thing about science is to be open-minded. It’s really important to realize that the true subject matter of science is the pursuit of the unknown. Sadly scientists have become extraordinarily group-oriented. Our most typical critics are not are mystic believer types. They are scientists who have a narrow vision of what the world is like.”- Dr. Michael Persinger

"Your family doctor is no longer free to choose the treatment he or she feels is best for you, but must follow the dictates established by physicians whose motives and alliances are such that their decisions may not be in your best interests." Dr. Leonard Levin

"Perhaps the greatest obstacle that frontier scientists are unprepared for but inevitably face is political - the tendency for human systems to resist change, to resist the impact of new discoveries, especially those that challenge the status quo of the scientific establishment "Science" has become institutionalised and is largely regulated by an establishment community that governs and maintains itself ... In recent times there has been a narrowing of perspectives resulting in a growing dogmatism, a dogmatic scientism. There is arrogance bordering on worship of contemporary scientific concepts and models ... taught in our schools in a deadening way which only serves to perpetrate the dogma ... Strangely, the contemporary scientific establishment has taken on the behaviour of one of its early oppressors: the church. Priests in white lab coats work in glass-and-steel cathedral-like laboratories, under the rule of bishops and cardinals who maintain orthodoxy through mainstream "peer review"." - Beverly Rubik Ph.D., Director of the Centre for Frontier Sciences at Temple University in Philadelphia



What is Pleomorphism?

Pleomorphism is the ability of microorganisms to change into distinct shapes, states or forms. Germ theory proposes that bacteria come from another bacteria the same shape and size. Over 150 years ago, medical biology was divided into two groups: the pleomorphists and the monomorphists.

Louis Pasteur is a HERO in textbooks, he's got his own statues and even institutions named after him and he was also the most famous monomorphist. Pasteur's formidable opponent Antoine Bechamp, who sadly today has fallen into obscurity in medical studies, concluded that bacteria were pleomorphic. The rivalry at the time was very fierce and is outlined in the book Bechamp or Pasteur: A lost chapter in the history of Biology by Douglas Hume. Hume alleges that Pasteur was a fraud, and stole much of his information from Bechamp (the author is a bit biased, but when you look at the facts you can't really blame him).

Bechamp's conclusions resulted from his work with fermentation. Using his Light microscope, Bechamp noted a very curious thing; when viewing the fermented solutions he observed little tiny bodies or microzymas as he called them in his notes. He continued to study them further and said that the microzymas were "more basic to life than cells". Now let that sink in, a form of life more elementary than cells! One should ask: What are these things? Why isn't this in every textbook? Who else has seen them?. I will answer all these questions but please do not reach a conclusion until after you've read all the presented information.

SOurce

Pasteur, famous for the technique pasteurization believed that disease came from OUTSIDE the body. However Bechamp believed that disease came from INSIDE the body or as a result of the body and that the bacterial forms that both scientists viewed had the ability to change and revert to more primitive forms. This is contrary to evolution theorists idea of how millions of strains of bacteria came to be.



To see with your own eyes pleomorphism in action watch the video put together by Grayfield Optical, makers of the Ergonom 500 microscope, which can see living viruses (endbionts) in action transforming into bacteria and fungal forms. Scroll down to the video on Symbiosis or parasitism: a treatise on cancer


Source

I would sum Bechamps philosophy to this: Disease is a result of the body. To cure disease you must treat the source, the body. In the aforementioned book, Pasteur on his deathbed is supposed to have said these words “Bernard was right; the pathogen is nothing; the terrain is everything.” It is also interesting to note that Pasteur instructed his grandson to never release his lab notes, but in 1995 the notes were released and have drawn fire and close scrutiny. The workings of Bechamp's philosophy would be GREATLY expanded upon in the mid 20th century.



In 1995, The Year of Pasteur, Geison wrote an article in the New York Times proclaiming that Pasteur had lied about his research on vaccines and germs and that most of his ideas had been plagiarized from his contemporaries. His article, "Pasteur’s Deception" claimed that Pasteur was, in the end, a fraud.


Source

Who else has observed these "tiny bodies"?

Beginning in the 1960s, Gaston Naessen's, a French biologist would go on to make several astonishing developments and discoveries in the fields of microbiology and medicine. The first being the revolutionary Somatoscope.






Two light sources: the first (1) an incandescent one with a wavelength of about 3600 angstrom, the second (2) an ultraviolet one with a wavelength of about 2200 angstrom beat against each other to produce a third wavelength of which passes through a monochromatic filter (3) to produce a monochromatic ray. This ray is exposed to magnetic fields (4)-the Zeeman effect- that divides tt to produce numerous parallel rays (5) that. In turn pass through a Kerr-cell (6) that increases the frequency. It is this light source, invisible to the naked eye, that strikes the specimen slides.


Conventional microscopes work by passing light through the specimen, so magnification is limited by the wavelength. In theory, to increase resolution the sample being used should be stimulated to increase the samples luminosity (i.e ultraviolet light). Which is how the Somatoscope works.! It can acheive a magnification of up to 150 angstroms, and though there are microscopes can produce up to 3 times this amount, but the problem doesn't seem to be magnification, but resolution.!

" The Somatoscope does not attempt to illuminate the specimen by passing light through two small objects. Instead, the illumination source is actually stimulating the specimen to the point it generates its own light. The light itself expands as it moves outward, eliminating the physical restrictions of optical microscopes."

Source
edit on 15-2-2012 by CaptainNemo because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-2-2012 by CaptainNemo because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-2-2012 by CaptainNemo because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 07:09 PM
link   
Thanks for this share.
There are many advances in science which have been ignored due to politics and ignorance.
This one surely deserves more consideration and research from the earths current brains trusts and students.



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 07:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by CaptainNemo
Germ theory is the basis of all modern medicine. All medical endeavors are based on the idea that germs cause disease therefore in an attempt to stop disease, the germs must be killed.


Sorry, I had to stop reading after the firsts 2 lines.

Seriously, all?






posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 07:18 PM
link   
What if anything does this theory say aboot prions??



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 07:31 PM
link   
With the use of his Somatoscope, Gaston too observed these "tiny bodies" which he called somatids and studied them with intense scrutiny. They exists and all mammals, plants and insects. And yep folks, there are pictures and videos of these things live and in action. Naessen's observed that the somatids were virtually indestructible.



Even stranger, over the years the somatids were revealed to be virtually indestructible! They have resisted exposure to carbonization temperatures of 200º C and more. They have survived exposure to 50,000 rems of nuclear radiation, far more than enough to kill any living thing. They have been totally unaffected by any acid. Taken from centrifuge residues, they have been found impossible to cut with a diamond knife; so unbelievably impervious to any such attempts is their hardness.


He observed that when the immune system is weakened or disrupted, the somatids go through thirteen succssessive pathogenic stages, but the somatids themselves having 3 normal stages, indicating a healthy person. A deviation from the normal cycle of somatids could be brought on by dietary factors, emotional health, and physical factors. Auto-immune disorders have also been associated with this cycle inluding CANCER, AIDS, MS, and lupus.

IMO the exponential increase in cancer diagnosis and other auto-immune disorders is due to the very poor diet of processed foods and high sugar intakes. Even orthodox cancer definitions will tell you that the cause of cancer is almost unknown and that cells just start to go "haywire". That's because it starts in the body.! Current lifestyle choices are turning our bodies into war zones. The medicinal industrial complex seeks to turn us all into "Bubble boys" instead of starting with the source.

The blood coursing through the body can become acidic, and studies show - I can't find any mainstream medicinal industrial complex, which we'll call the MIC from now on, studies on Alkali diets, probably because all the scientists get payed to discredit such. show lowered pH levels have positive health effects.



An acidic balance will: decrease the body's ability to absorb minerals and other nutrients, decrease the energy production in the cells, decrease it's ability to repair damaged cells, decrease it's ability to detoxify heavy metals, make tumor cells thrive, and make it more susceptible to fatigue and illness. A blood pH of 6.9, which is only slightly acidic, can induce coma and death.


Please see this website for ways to adjust your diet to alkalize the blood

Source

. He even claimed that using the stages he was able to "pre-diagnose" a patient. One thing that Gaston claims is that he knows everything about these fascinating entities, in fact he knows very little about them.



So the Somatids are the pathogenic organisms, but the pathogenic organisms aren't somatids
(Square is a rectangle, but a rectangle isn't a square)



Why do the Somatids appear to move so erratically?

This may be attributed to Gaston's observations that the somatids had a positive nuclei, and a negative cell membrane, thus repelling each other. De-bunkers would argue that these "anomolies" are just debris of the blood, but this is not the case as they seem to be intelligent and interact with eachother and the red and white blood cells.

"We should recall that a century ago platelets, now known to be a crucial element in the blood were considered simply "debris derived from the degradation of other blood cells" (Beck, WS, ed. Hematology, MIT Press 1994: 542)

Gaston Naessens then went on to develop 714-X, an enzyme based cancer treatment injected in the lymph nodes (also deemed impossible by the MIC) which stabilizes and readjusts the patients immune system. In it's first clinical run through Naessen claims to have cured 750 out of 1000 people. The treatment doesn't work for everyone, as extensive chemotherapy and radiation therapy can do irreprehensible damage to the body. But Like Bechamp previously stated, Gaston reitterates: "germs are not the cause of disease, but the result of disease".

When Naessens first went public with 714-X, the gates of hell were opened by the Canadian medical authorities. A vicious campaign was undergone to discredit, ridicule, and even jail mr. Naessen's. The FDA has banned the sale of 714-X and the American Cancer Society had this to say:

"There is no scientific evidence that 714-X is effective in treating any type of cancer or any other illness"

These people spent more time making Naessen's look like a quack, then disproving him

714-X is still accesible in Canado through special programs, only after doctors force you to go through months or years of painful chemotherapy, and drain you of all your energy and hope.



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 07:32 PM
link   
Thats the think about "germ" theory. It wants to be all-inclusive but it can only be so if "Germ' is extended to all pathogenic components including even genetics, mutagens, carcinogens, etc etc

In the case of prions, they are not the typical "germs" as bacteria, viruses, fungi, protozoa, parasites, either.

prion = "protein infection". they are misfolded bits of protein with no nucleus or DNA. if they get into the bloodstream, they cause normally-folded proteins to "misfold" by copying the first prion(s). The brain is simply not able to cope with these strange forms, so is then said to be infected. Prion disease is always in the brain and always fatal. A good example is 'mad cow disease'.

Another example would be cannibalism. No matter how well the cow brain or human flesh is cooked, one can still acquire 'protein infection" from simply ingesting a single cell of seemingly autoclaved or sterilized tissues.


Farmers feeding their cows pet food by-products (which include recycled beef) is partly to blame for the increased incidence of prionic infections ie mad cows.



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 07:33 PM
link   
Please see The Persecution and Trial of Gaston Naessens by Christopher Byrd for a more in-depth look at the smeer campaign.

I'll end the thread with this quote from Jesus, on the body of a man:

"There is nothing from without a man, that entering into him can defile him: but the things which come out of him, those are they that defile the man." - Mark 7:15



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 07:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by ignant

Originally posted by CaptainNemo
Germ theory is the basis of all modern medicine. All medical endeavors are based on the idea that germs cause disease therefore in an attempt to stop disease, the germs must be killed.


Sorry, I had to stop reading after the firsts 2 lines.

Seriously, all?





What else would it be based upon?

Germs make you sick, kill the germs and you won't get sick

Seems pretty rudimentary to me.



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 07:40 PM
link   
Kill the germs, and we still get sick.

There are so many other causes of sickness/disease than germs, no?

Rudimentary modern medicine? LOL



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 07:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by stirling
What if anything does this theory say aboot prions??


Directly? Nothing, but basically a prion is still a pathogen or causes infection or disease. So therefore it was once a somatid.

Sadly this is only the works of a very limited amount of scientists or PIONEERS and this is only the tip of the ice berg. Books have to be rewritten, and people have to forget what they know.
edit on 15-2-2012 by CaptainNemo because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 07:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by ignant
Kill the germs, and we still get sick.

There are so many other causes of sickness/disease than germs, no?

Rudimentary modern medicine? LOL


Yeah there are, but genetic mutations and complex disease weren't known 150 years ago, I said the BASIS and anything from there has been expanded upon.

Bechamp and Gaston's philosophy are base upon the environment, the body and all disease a result of the body.

Think of the body as a balanced scale. If the scales or body become unbalanced a deviation of the normal 3 stage somatid cycle occurs and consequently 13 pathogenic stages follow



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 07:52 PM
link   
reply to post by CaptainNemo
 


F&S!!!

IIRC Dr. Royal Rife is said to have observed examples of pleomorphism

www.educate-yourself.org...


Dr. Royal Rife
In the late 20's and early 1930's, Dr. Royal Raymond Rife from San Diego, California, developed a high powered microscope which he used in conjunction with a frequency generator. Using special UV light, Rife's mircroscope was capable of 60,000x magnification! This degree of magnification allowed him to observe LIVE virus and bacteria organisms while he applied the MOR (Mortal Oscillatory Resonance) frequency from his frequency generator via plasma tube radiation of the energy. He was able to destroy all manner of disease organisms (including cancer related organisms) by merely 'tuning' the generator to the correct resonant frequency of these organisms and applying the oscillating electric fields via the plasma driven, "Beam Ray Tube". Everything in the universe, living or dead, and its own resonant frequency. If you apply this exact resonant frequency to the object or organism, it will begin vibrating until it literally shatters itself. You've all seen the wine glass and the opera singer demonstration. Same deal for microbes.



Pleomorphism, Its Discovery and Suppression
When Louis Pasteur (1822 – 1895) went public with his Germ Theory of disease, Europe continued to be ravaged by waves of infectious plagues, including Cholera, Typhus, Pneumonia (‘consumption’) and Tuberculosis; not to mention the not-too-distant memory of the Black Death. Pasteur’s discovery was due to the invention of the microscope.

The officials and public of the era were ripe for a simple and direct explanation from the emerging world of the Natural Sciences for these tragic and decimating diseases. However, at the time Pasteur was formulating and publicizing his work, a quiet, much more qualified and experienced researcher, Pierre Bechamp, was also looking at the new frontier-world of microbes, and came up with a more complex, but thorough, understanding of these miniature marvels.

He identified a fundamental unit of microbiological life, named the ‘microzyma’, which he said was critical in supporting the life of cells, but could be triggered into pathogenic states, depending on specific changes in the state of the internal (particularly the blood) environment. Therefore, the bacteria and other micro-organisms; viruses and fungi, that were being blamed as the cause of disease, were viewed by Bechamp as being part of Nature’s ‘clean-up crew’, breaking down sick tissue and ultimately decomposing a no-longer-occupied body. Bechamp also viewed these micro-organisms as ‘changing forms’ (pleomorphic): from seed to bacterial, viral and fungal states, rather than being seen as discrete species unto themselves.

Once these bugs have done the job, they revert to the ‘seed’ stage once again ready to support new life. The very ground we stand on is teeming with these fundamental biological units. I once saw a video of a microzma expiring and emitting a photon of light in the process. Perhaps these units represent the transitional point where Light becomes living Matter.

The consciousness of the era, however, was, as noted, looking for a simpler, more linear explanation for disease, and as Pasteur was more of a PR man than Bechamp, he won the recognition of academia and society. Also, the simplistic notion of ‘kill the bug, cure the disease’ was very appealing for the emerging Pharmaceutical trade, and continues to provide a major illusion in support of one of the newest ‘plagues’, the overuse of antibiotics.

Pasteur’s conscience, however, moved him to say on his deathbed, “Bechamp was right!”.



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 08:12 PM
link   
I could have posted first, but I did the OP the courtesy of reading the post and the sources first. I think I basically agree with the whole idea. I was struck by these tiny living things and I kept thinking about the "midichlorians" in Star Wars. Did Lucas know?



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 08:15 PM
link   
reply to post by DerepentLEstranger
 


Thanks, I just want this thread to reach some people that really need it, maybe they know somebody suffering through cancer or something. It really sh**** that people have to be on their deathbeds for them to consider alternatives;

And yeah, I contemplated adding Rife's studies into this thread but I had already gone through 2 posts worth of space
I think the field is called "Darkfield" microscopy. Seems like the best scientists always fall into oblivion


Here's another link on alkalizing the body, or taking back the battle field
www.smartbodyz.com...



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 08:17 PM
link   
reply to post by Lazarus Short
 


i think midichlorians are more likely to be
the Bions www.orgonelab.org... discovered by Reich



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 08:22 PM
link   
reply to post by CaptainNemo
 


you're welcome
i've occasionally posted those links in other threads
but was ignored or shat upon

perhaps we'll have the last laugh after all


the debunkers and pharma shills must be having a day off

i've u2u'd Soficrow our resident expert on prions but she's offline at the mo



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 08:24 PM
link   
reply to post by DerepentLEstranger
 


Woah, I read the part on biological resonate frequencies. That's amazing.! That should tie into my research on another field;

www.springerlink.com...

In this study, a certain frequency of ultrasound was found to increase biophotonic emissions of bio-tissues; The somatoscope is just amplifying the already existing field. Resonance is an amazing thing.

I find it funny that the drawback of using electron microscope is that you have to KILL the thing first; Hahaha no wonder there so limited.



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 08:25 PM
link   
reply to post by DerepentLEstranger
 


Are they the same thing or not? You seem to know more about this stuff than I do, and I've been studying it for some decades now!



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 08:29 PM
link   
I just changed the thread title, hopefully this won't go overlooked LOL



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 08:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Lazarus Short
 


L
L

we'd have to ask lucas
however he did base [the original trilogy, at least] on Myth [which used to mean True Story]

who's to say

Reich thought bions were the fundamental units of life soo...



new topics

top topics



 
15
<<   2 >>

log in

join