It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A Vote Against Ron Paul Is A Vote FOR War

page: 1
8

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 14 2012 @ 02:19 PM
link   


The only way to stop the rapid decline of the America economy, the only way to stop the oncoming war with Iran, the only way to bring back lost freedoms, vote Ron Paul?

Well it sounds good and I know he intends to do these things but will it ever happen? Would the America stage be ready to except a Ron Paul, furthermore will they let it happen? TPTB have gone to great lengths to see that Ron is seen as a racist, sexist and many other slanderous falsities. Are they afraid of Ron's message? It appears so...



posted on Feb, 14 2012 @ 02:44 PM
link   
reply to post by PageAlaCearl
 


We get to vote against people now? Besides I though Ron Paul had a great plan to win the nomination without anybody voting for him.



posted on Feb, 14 2012 @ 02:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrSpad
reply to post by PageAlaCearl
 


We get to vote against people now? Besides I though Ron Paul had a great plan to win the nomination without anybody voting for him.


No you cannot vote against somebody directly, a vote against somebody is a vote for an opposite candidate, that's what the video is about, I swear you have to spell it out in lamens terms on ATS
edit on 14-2-2012 by PageAlaCearl because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 14 2012 @ 02:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by PageAlaCearl

Originally posted by MrSpad
reply to post by PageAlaCearl
 


We get to vote against people now? Besides I though Ron Paul had a great plan to win the nomination without anybody voting for him.


No you cannot vote against somebody directly, a vote against somebody is a vote for an opposite candidate, that's what the video is about, I swear you have to spell it out in lamens terms on ATS
edit on 14-2-2012 by PageAlaCearl because: (no reason given)


So if you vote for anybody other than Paul you are voting for war? Lets see vote for Paul or vote for war.... Guess thats one vote for war.



posted on Feb, 14 2012 @ 03:04 PM
link   
Sounds an awful oot like "Vote for Obama or you're a racist" or the recent "Side with us and our wish to read all private electronic mail or side with the child pornographers!" Inflammatory, false either-or statements serve no one.



posted on Feb, 14 2012 @ 03:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrSpad
reply to post by PageAlaCearl
 


We get to vote against people now? Besides I though Ron Paul had a great plan to win the nomination without anybody voting for him.


Can I borrow that last line?
I've been wondering how to put it in words to all the people who are still so retarded for Paul, they can't see reality. (BTW Jack Burton Rules!)



posted on Feb, 14 2012 @ 03:11 PM
link   
Just saw on cnn that the current fabricated poll has santorum and romney tied for first. Santorum is way too intrusive in private matters. Really a religious nut who will try to impose his beliefs on the country. Romney is basically a man who has spent his career making a profit by ending others careers. Just can't stand either of them. Paul was in third in this poll ahead of gingrich. I'm voting for Ron Paul come March 6 th.



posted on Feb, 14 2012 @ 03:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by the owlbear

Originally posted by MrSpad
reply to post by PageAlaCearl
 


We get to vote against people now? Besides I though Ron Paul had a great plan to win the nomination without anybody voting for him.


Can I borrow that last line?
I've been wondering how to put it in words to all the people who are still so retarded for Paul, they can't see reality. (BTW Jack Burton Rules!)


Feel free. I am sure Ron Paul is fine person and he even has some good ideas but, when you get beyond them he has alot of very bad ideas. Not that it really matters anything he would want to do he would have to get through congress and the courts and we know how well that works out.



posted on Feb, 14 2012 @ 03:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrSpad

Feel free. I am sure Ron Paul is fine person and he even has some good ideas but, when you get beyond them he has alot of very bad ideas.

A vote for Mitt would be a vote for that Status Quo, Have you looked around your country lately?

You want more of the same?

Your vote.



posted on Feb, 14 2012 @ 03:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrSpad

Originally posted by the owlbear

Originally posted by MrSpad
reply to post by PageAlaCearl
 


We get to vote against people now? Besides I though Ron Paul had a great plan to win the nomination without anybody voting for him.


Can I borrow that last line?
I've been wondering how to put it in words to all the people who are still so retarded for Paul, they can't see reality. (BTW Jack Burton Rules!)


Feel free. I am sure Ron Paul is fine person and he even has some good ideas but, when you get beyond them he has alot of very bad ideas. Not that it really matters anything he would want to do he would have to get through congress and the courts and we know how well that works out.


I think my father in law said it best. Paul has a 20% problem. No matter what your political ideology, Paul has some good things to say, but, with the right/left paradigm, there is about 20% of his platform that is anathema to mainstream voters.



posted on Feb, 14 2012 @ 03:36 PM
link   
I cannot agree more. With WW3 so close we really need a President that is totally committed to sincere diplomatic resolutions. In all the rhetoric from both the Democrats and Republicans, Dr. Paul is the only one who is saying that "militarily staying the course" is insanity.

Too many fine people have already died for the financial profits of the elite. It must stop now.



new topics

top topics



 
8

log in

join